On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 02:28:03AM +0100, Jeff Green wrote:
Eileen Orbell wrote:
Hi,
What is the best way to disable or better still un-install Telnet and FTP
packages? I am using ssh now and want to close both FTP and Telnet ports
down.
Thanks
apt-get install telnetd-
same
apt-get install telnetd-
same for whichever ftp daemon you had installed
Eileen Orbell wrote:
Hi,
What is the best way to disable or better still un-install Telnet and FTP
packages? I am using ssh now and want to close both FTP and Telnet ports
down.
Thanks
Eileen Orbell
Software
ae /etc/inetd.conf
comment out the telnet and ftp lines
also, I would normally use dselect and remove both the telnet and ftp
packages..
if you do not want to remove the packages, then remove from rcX.d the
scripts which fire up the daemons for ftp and telnet
For example:-
mv
El miércoles 11 de octubre de 2000 a la(s) 16:46:11 -0500, Lemus Moreno Jose A
contaba:
Alguien pregunto como quitar en /etc/passwd el shell pero de forma que no
entre a telnet pero a ftp si pueda entrar alguien que me pueda decir como
hacerle
Mi primo me llamó al rato diciendo que
Have you tried typing
telnet 127.0.0.1 25
? Maybe the IP is wrong?
Matthew Sherborne
-Original Message-
From: Paul McHale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 October 2000 4:39 p.m.
To: kmself@ix.netcom.com; Debian-User; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Telnet
Have you tried typing
telnet 127.0.0.1 25
? Maybe the IP is wrong?
Another good idea! Unfortunately, it gave the same results.
--
Paul McHale
Work: 937-320-5495 Double E Solutions
Mobile: 937-371-2828 1435 Edenwood Dr
Fax:413-215-3232
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:39:20PM -0400, Paul McHale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: kmself@ix.netcom.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:28:26PM -0400, Paul McHale
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When I type:
telnet IP_NUM 25
I get:
telnet:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:39:20PM -0400, Paul McHale wrote:
The server IP_NUM isn't running SMTP ?
There is a firewall between your host and IP_NUM ?
You're not connected to the same network ?
The host is refusing your connection. It's either IP filtered, denied
through
Strongly recommend you take a look at this rant on problem reporting:
Let's see if I can better address it using the points from a summary you
mentioned.
Point 1: The first aim of a bug report is to let the programmer see the
failure with his own eyes.
This really applies to bug reporting. I
Subject: RE: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
Date: Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:39:20PM -0400
In reply to:Paul McHale
Quoting Paul McHale([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The server IP_NUM isn't running SMTP ?
There is a firewall between your host and IP_NUM ?
You're
If I recall, the correct line to be used with Sendmail is
sendmail: all
to allow all users.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Wayne Topa wrote:
Subject: RE: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
Date: Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:39:20PM -0400
In reply to:Paul McHale
Quoting
If I recall, the correct line to be used with Sendmail is
sendmail: all
to allow all users.
This is what it was set to. I changed it to try the suggestion.
Unfortunately, it did not improve. I think I might just upgrade to potato.
I know this is not the best cure, but I am interested in
release anyway.
No, this is indeed not the best way.
You got the correct answer already, what's wrong with it?
From: brian moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
To: Debian-User debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:06:57 -0700
Subject: Re: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
Date: Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 09:22:45AM -0400
In reply to:Alec Smith
Quoting Alec Smith([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If I recall, the correct line to be used with Sendmail is
sendmail: all
to allow all users.
Hmm, might
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 06:41:30AM -0400, Paul McHale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Strongly recommend you take a look at this rant on problem reporting:
Let's see if I can better address it using the points from a summary you
mentioned.
Point 1: The first aim of a bug report is to let the
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 09:03:59PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Note that anything above 95% diskspace used is only available to root.
This is not quite accurate.
The ext2fs default is to reserve some number of blocks -- 10% of total,
IIRC -- for root access only.
* kmself == kmself kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
kmself The ext2fs default is to reserve some number of blocks -- 10%
kmself of total, IIRC -- for root access only. This reserved value
kmself is *not* reported by df and other tools as available, it's
kmself reserved off the top. You can modify
--
-Original Message-
From: Martin Bialasinski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:04 PM
To: Paul McHale
Cc: Debian-User
Subject: Re: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
* Paul == Paul McHale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Paul This is what it was set
Creo que cambiando el shell (/bin/bash, p.ej.) por /dev/null.
Saludos.
Virgilio
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Lemus Moreno Jose A wrote:
Alguien pregunto como quitar en /etc/passwd el shell pero de forma que no
entre a telnet pero a ftp si pueda entrar alguien que me pueda decir como
hacerle
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:56:57PM +, stefan goeman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Hello,
For some testing I want to setup a telnet and/or an ftp connection to
a remote machine (I also have physical access to the remote machine).
Is it possible to setup such connection WITHOUT providing any
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:28:26PM -0400, Paul McHale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When I type:
telnet IP_NUM 25
I get:
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection Refused
The host is refusing your connection. It's either IP filtered, denied
through /etc/hosts.allow or
The server IP_NUM isn't running SMTP ?
There is a firewall between your host and IP_NUM ?
You're not connected to the same network ?
Just guesses
Matthew Sherborne
-Original Message-
From: Paul McHale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 October 2000 3:28 p.m.
To:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:28:26PM -0400, Paul McHale wrote:
telnet IP_NUM 25
I get:
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection Refused
Just a wild guess, but: are you actually typing IP_NUM or are you
substituting a real IP number?
Some servers are configured to refuse
@ix.netcom.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 10:35 PM
To: Debian-User
Subject: Re: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:28:26PM -0400, Paul McHale
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When I type:
telnet IP_NUM 25
I get
Just a wild guess, but: are you actually typing IP_NUM or are you
substituting a real IP number?
Some servers are configured to refuse telnet connections. (Telnet
I am actually putting the IP number in :) I can telnet to the standard
telnet port just fine. From another machine, that is.
Una forma muy bonita de hacerlo es utilizando las
librerias PAM que tienes en /etc/pam.d . Ahí tienes un
montón de archivos de configuración de telnet,ftp,ssh,
etc. Podrás restringir a quien quieras.
--- Hue-Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Buinas!
Mi primito quiere que
Sin saber de que demonio de ftp que usais , pero es bastante posible que
requiera que /usr/bin/flase este listada en /etc/shells.
Espero que eso ayude, funciona en el caso de ftpd de openBSD.
un saludo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd pub
Ya te han contestado un par, aquí va mi solución, suponiendo que esté usando
WU-FTPD...
La shell /bin/false no está declarada en /etc/shells seguramente, lo cual si
como me imagino, está usando el WU-FTPD, no les dejaría entrar.
Otro tema que también podría que hacer (con el WU-FTPD) es que
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 02:09:03PM -0400, Ethan Pierce wrote
Hi, im wondering about the security of telnet - people say its really
unsecure...does this mean that someone would need to be running a network
sniffer on my ip to catch the data?
I telnet to my ISP from work, (only telnet
About telnet: It COULD be a misconfigured firewall (see what ipchains -L
gives you)
About ftp: firewall could also be the problem, but maybe you're not
running a ftpd.
Ron Rademaker
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Triggs; Ian wrote:
Hi, I just installed potato and set up the computer correctly for use on
This could be it, as I have a cable modem connected straight into my hub,
and another computer on the network being the firewall, however it only
has one card so it is using the one ethernet card for both the cable modem
and the LAN.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Ron Rademaker wrote:
About telnet: It
Ethan Pierce wrote:
Hi, im wondering about the security of telnet - people say its really
unsecure...does this mean that someone would need to be running a network
sniffer on my ip to catch the data?
Yup. And there's plenty of different apps out there to do just that.
I telnet to my ISP
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Hi, im wondering about the security of telnet - people say its really
unsecure...does this mean that someone would need to be running a
network sniffer on my ip to catch the data?
Yep. Telnet was written back when worrying about
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 07:49:34PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Will == Will Trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will i want the remote (linux server) full-screen process (mutt, vi,
Will etc) to suspend when i send ^Z, despite the fact that i'm using
Will telnet, and not sitting at the
Will i tried % bash $ vi and then '^Z', and still get nothing but a
Will screen-flash (as if doing a quick redraw).
That's not good enough, it has to be your login shell. See Stevens,
A.P.U.E. pp. 246 and forward, why it makes a difference.
--
Ian Zimmerman, Oakland, California, U.S.A.
In his
Hi Will,
At 13.23 29/6/00 -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
i've got linux in the basement, cranking and serving
like a dream. to administer, i'm upstairs and i get
in via telnet on my local 192.168.*.* intranet.
on the console (linux keyboard/mouse/monitor) i can
use ^Z to suspend a foreground job,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:17:46AM +0200, Alberto Rodríguez Ortega wrote:
Hi Will,
At 13.23 29/6/00 -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
i've got linux in the basement, cranking and serving
like a dream. to administer, i'm upstairs and i get
in via telnet on my local 192.168.*.* intranet.
on the
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 01:23:14PM -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
i've got linux in the basement, cranking and serving
like a dream. to administer, i'm upstairs and i get
in via telnet on my local 192.168.*.* intranet.
on the console (linux keyboard/mouse/monitor) i can
use ^Z to suspend a
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 08:31:22PM +, C. Falconer wrote:
My advice is to forget telnet, and use SSH instead.
apt-get install ssh
on the linux machine, and get PuTTY for your other machines
(mac/pc/alpha/etc available)
If you can't find it email me and I'll dig up a URL
oh, i've got
Will == Will Trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will i want the remote (linux server) full-screen process (mutt, vi,
Will etc) to suspend when i send ^Z, despite the fact that i'm using
Will telnet, and not sitting at the console.
Will hell, i just tried it from the perl debugger, which doesn't
Recently, I have learned that telnet is not a good idea and
have seen so many suggestion on ssh and wondering how would
I do this from windows/NT? I did not seen windows/NT provide
the ssh.
There are two ssh clients for NT that are freely available.
Putty -
Recently, I have learned that telnet is not a good idea and
have seen so many suggestion on ssh and wondering how would
I do this from windows/NT? I did not seen windows/NT provide
the ssh.
You need to use TeraTerm with the SSH extension or something of that
kind. I use TeraTerm with the
* Timothy C Phan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recently, I have learned that telnet is not a good idea and
have seen so many suggestion on ssh and wondering how would I
do this from windows/NT? I did not seen windows/NT provide
the ssh.
You could use PuTTY or TeraTerm Pro (haven't got
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 04:51:58PM +0200, Christopher Splinter wrote:
* Timothy C Phan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recently, I have learned that telnet is not a good idea and
have seen so many suggestion on ssh and wondering how would I
do this from windows/NT? I did not seen
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies I got.
One more question, does Debian offer the sshd and ssh client
in debianized package? I could not seem to find them anywhere.
Thanks!
Christopher Splinter wrote:
* Timothy C Phan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recently, I have learned that
NetConcepts
www.netconcepts.ai
bwz*mq
-Original Message-
From: Dan Brosemer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 12:42 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: telnet replacement
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 04:51:58PM +0200, Christopher Splinter
Timothy C. Phan wrote:
One more question, does Debian offer the sshd and ssh client
in debianized package? I could not seem to find them anywhere.
You have to get it from the non-US section. For example, you could add
this line to your sources.list in /etc/apt:
deb
Hi,
I think that I need some document on the ssh.
I thought ssh and sshd are the client and server that would
replace telnet and telnetd respective. Why is ssh only available
for non-us distribution?
Secondly, I log on to the site below and found:
non-free/
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:25:44PM -0500, Timothy C. Phan wrote:
I think that I need some document on the ssh.
www.openssh.com
I thought ssh and sshd are the client and server that would
replace telnet and telnetd respective. Why is ssh only available
for non-us distribution?
The
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 09:27:57AM -0500, Timothy C. Phan wrote:
I do this from windows/NT? I did not seen windows/NT provide
the ssh.
You can get a no-charge telnet program called Tera Term, and add the ttssh
module to it. See
http://www.zip.com.au/~roca/ttssh.html
A
--
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 01:52:31PM -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote:
The US has strange laws which restrict the export of cryptographic code.
The point of SSH is its cryptographic code, and thus cannot be exported from
the US. That doesn't mean it can't be imported _to_ the US, though. That's
what
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 01:52:31PM -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote:
I don't
know if there is a telnet-ssl client for NT, so you might want to look for
that and if you find one, give telnet-ssl and telnetd-ssl a try. I really
don't know how they work or what's available for NT, though.
There's an
Rob wrote:
What is your TERM setting on both sides?
Are both sides Debian?
rob helmer
( namodn )
i wondered at that, too. (i use telnet from my mac,
and it's got what appears to be full ansi/vt220 support
of color--plus as i said, i do get ls to generate
colors but many other programs yield
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:05:32PM -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
Is there a way to keep my Telnet port open but still have security?
Disable your network connection.
The general answer is no, ssh should be used instead. There is also a
telnet-ssl secure mode, though I haven't used it.
On the very
At 10:05 PM 5/19/00 -0700, Jay Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to keep my Telnet port open but still have security?
No. At least not *good* security.
Never tell me the odds!---
Ray Olszewski-- Han Solo
Palo
Jay Kelly wrote:
Is there a way to keep my Telnet port open but still have security?
Telnet is inherently insecure because it doesn't encrypt communication
going across the wire, particularly passwords. That's why the world is
migrating to SSH.
Using TCP Wrappers you can tighten the security
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:05:32PM -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
Is there a way to keep my Telnet port open but still have security?
I just went through this. I installed ssh on my linux box removed telnet.
If you're
connecting from a windows box to your linux box, get puTTY
for windows.
fred
: Friday, May 19, 2000 11:57 PM
To: Debian User List
Subject: Re: Telnet Security
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:05:32PM -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
Is there a way to keep my Telnet port open but still have security?
I just went through this. I installed ssh on my linux box removed telnet.
If you're
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:05:32PM -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
Is there a way to keep my Telnet port open but still have security?
sure, in /etc/ssh/sshd_config change:
Port 22 to
Port 23
;-)
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpiQaynuNaSe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
To: Debian User List
Subject: Re: Telnet Security
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:05:32PM -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
Is there a way to keep my Telnet port open but still have security?
I just went through this. I installed ssh on my linux box removed telnet.
If you're
connecting from a windows box
John Bagdanoff said:
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 12:03:04AM -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
Someone told me about security key but I cant remeber the web page where to
download them. I guess you need to have a key installed on the remote pc
that matches the server key. Anybody know what Im talking about?
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 04:17:23AM -0400, Brian Clark wrote:
John Bagdanoff said:
If you use the authentication type RSA in conjunction with SSH instead of
authentication type password, you'll need to exchange keys with the host
for it to be able to authenticate you.
If I understand
Hi
How do you tell that ssh is running during your Telnet/Rlogin
connection?
Not totally sure, but whilst you're in, running ps should show a
process named sshd.
How do you set-up ssh to work?
Assuming you have debian, run:
for the client
# apt-get update; apt-get install ssh
and the daemon
At 06:14 PM 5/20/00 +0700, Umum Wijoyo wrote:
The previous discussion on Telnet security interested me.
I would thus like to ask:
How do you tell that ssh is running during your Telnet/Rlogin connection?
You don't. ssh is a different service from telnet, more or less a drop-in
replacement for
At 02:31 PM 5/20/00 +0200, Sven Burgener wrote [in part]:
How do you set-up ssh to work?
Assuming you have debian, run:
for the client
# apt-get update; apt-get install ssh
and the daemon
# apt-get update; apt-get install sshd
Did you check this? According to apt-cache search ssh (running on
for the client
# apt-get update; apt-get install ssh
and the daemon
# apt-get update; apt-get install sshd
Did you check this? According to apt-cache search ssh (running on
potato),
there is no sshd package. My memory says that ssh installs both the
server (daemon) and the client of OpenSSH.
When I run apt-get install ssh (after first having run apt-get install
update), I get an error message saying that there is no available
version, but the package exists in the database. What's up with that?
# apt-get install ssh
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You need an entry in /etc/apt/sources.list for a non-US distribution site.
Remember: those nasty US crypto-as-munitions export rules haven't actually
ended yet!
At 09:44 AM 5/20/00 -0700, Miguel Wooding wrote [in part]:
When I run apt-get install ssh (after first having run apt-get install
Hi Miguel!
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Miguel Wooding SF Ten.Union wrote:
When I run apt-get install ssh (after first having run apt-get install
update), I get an error message saying that there is no available
version, but the package exists in the database. What's up with that?
my
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 09:15:52AM +0800, Curtis Hogg wrote:
A friend of mine (as am I) is running Debian 2.1 that has been
dist-upgraded to woody, and while he can telnet into my machine just fine,
I cannot telnet into his, the error received states-
telnetd: getpty: permission denied
Curtis Hogg wrote:
A friend of mine (as am I) is running Debian 2.1 that has been
dist-upgraded to woody, and while he can telnet into my machine just fine,
I cannot telnet into his, the error received states-
telnetd: getpty: permission denied
the permissions on his ptys and ttys and
Al final, buscando en los paquetes debian he encontrado lo que quería, se trata
de la librería
libtcp4u3. Tiene una serie de opciones para conexiones tcp y udp bastante
interesantes. Aunque para una conexión telnet es preciso retocar algunas cosas.
Respecto a la instalación de debian en sparc,
You should check your /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny, and your
ipchains.
Ron Rademaker
PS. I would recommend using ssh instead of telnet because of security
issues. (ssh is encrypted and therefore lot safer, telnet eg. sends
passwords over the network as plain text)
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000,
I am having problems telneting to a Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 machine.
I can telnet to it from itself 127.0.0.1 and from a box with the IP of
209.240.44.14, I determined that the 14 IP works by reconfiguring 2
other boxs to to use that IP (one at a time of couse), one was RH 6.1
and other Windows
El viernes 07 de abril de 2000 a la(s) 21:04:52 +0200, Javier Fdz-Sanguino
Pen~a contaba:
Y una recomendación... es un *gran* agujero de seguridad así que recomiendo
que se defina muy bien donde se instala... cualquiera que capture la
password que se pasa en la red (que creo que no tiene soporte
En el trabajo usamos el VNC (Virtual Network Computing, busca asi en
yahoo y lo encontrarás), es un program gratuito que vale para lo que
buscas y está disponible para pc, mac, amiga, linux... y hace eso... es
un servidor que permite acceder a clientes X al ordenador que sirve y en
el mismo
Alexandre Maneu i Victòria wrote:
creo que lo que tu quieres se llama xhost Tu te conectas con la maquina
remota, y ella te envía las imagenes correspondientes a las ventanas. No se
más del tema, pero seguro que está documentado por ahí...
También existe la opción de usar VNC, si las
Umm.. VNC está en Debian (si, sí, yo también me sorprendí cuando lo
instalaron en el trabajo y al mirar en Debian ya estaba). Por cierto no es
gratuito es libre :)
Otra puntualización: *no* instala un cliente X lo que le hace más
rápido en realidad, porque no guarda información
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Raúl Miró wrote:
| Quizás no me haya explicado bien.
| Cada vez existe más máquinas no propiamente unix que sin embargo su
| interfax de control hombre-máquina se realiza a través de telnet.
¿Has mirado libnet-telnet-perl?
]
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 3:32 AM
Subject: RE: Telnet automatizado
| Quizás no me haya explicado bien.
| Cada vez existe más máquinas no propiamente unix que sin embargo su
interfax de
| control hombre-máquina se realiza a través de telnet.
|
| La idea
--- Original Message ---
Antonio AngelSanz Arrospide [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wrote on
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 15:52:43 -0500
--
¿Quisiera saber si existe alguna forma automatizada de hacer
telnet,
preferiblemente si se puede programar desde C.
Aunque no es exactamente lo que tu
Quizás no me haya explicado bien.
Cada vez existe más máquinas no propiamente unix que sin embargo su interfax de
control hombre-máquina se realiza a través de telnet.
La idea sería crear un interfaz de ventanas gráfico para operar sobre ellas,
pero que por debajo se realice un telnet a la
AC Ya sé que es un fallo de seguridad del tamaño de un misil, pero os
AC rogaría que me comenteís qué fichero hace capaz de un acceso por telnet
AC como root.
AC He habilitado en /etc/securetty, ttyp0 pero nada.
/etc/hosts.allow si usas tcpd tambien...
De todos modos no es pecado si utilizas
El lunes 03 de abril de 2000 a la(s) 10:14:03 +0200, Angel Carrasco contaba:
He habilitado en /etc/securetty, ttyp0 pero nada.
Pon más, ttyp1 ttyp2 y quizá pts/0 pts/1.
--
Just do it.
David Serrano [EMAIL PROTECTED]Linux 2.2.14 - Reg. User #87069
lynx -dump
Check the local_domains setting in etc/exim.conf, and make sure that
it includes localhost. It should look something like:
local_domains = localhost:mydomain.com
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 04:53:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
I have infact installed exim and
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 05:24:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try to 'telnet localhost 25' I get the following error message:
Telnet unable to connect to the local host.
connection refused.
I was wondering if anyone could help me get telnet working as I
suspect that this problem is
Thanks for the reply.
I have infact installed exim and have configured /etc/exim.conf, though
whether it's configured properly is another matter.
Is it possible that something in the exim.conf is incorrectly configured
or that whatever program is responsible for strating exim is not being
On 10 Mar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
I have infact installed exim and have configured /etc/exim.conf, though
whether it's configured properly is another matter.
Is it possible that something in the exim.conf is incorrectly configured
or that whatever program is
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Hi,
I am not sure if this is a newbie, or experienced question,,, which
means that it is probably a newbie question.
I have been trying to allow telnet access to my machine
In securetty I have all the options I have seen.
In
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 06:45:21PM -0500, Jonathan Hendler wrote:
Hi, I am not sure if this is a newbie, or experienced question,,,
which means that it is probably a newbie question.
I have been trying to allow telnet access to my machine
In securetty I have all the options I have seen.
Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there any telnet clients available other than the one that comes in
the telnet package?
There is telnet-ssl (aka ssltelnet), which supports SSL encryption but
should work without it too.
I've also heard of a Telnet client that supports ZModem file
On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Sam Babak wrote:
I was given a job to administer sendmail v8.7 on Debian/Linux and I am
new to Linux.
wow , great! In everybody's opinion , if you're new to linux , stick to
redhat for awhile...and then try debian ... but looks like you're like me
;-)
location. When I
Well... I would say add the following line to your /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US
Then, run dselect, update, then select search ( use / ) for ssh. I think
there are
3 ssh packages. The ones you want are obvious by the description. This is
Why use non-US Debian if I'm in the US ?
thanks guys for your help.
Aaron Solochek wrote:
Well... I would say add the following line to your /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US
Then, run dselect, update, then select search ( use / ) for ssh. I
Because ssh is only in the non-US distro... Something to do with cryptography
inport/export law. I don't know much about it.
-Aaron Solochek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Babak wrote:
Why use non-US Debian if I'm in the US ?
thanks guys for your help.
Aaron Solochek wrote:
Well... I would say
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Patrick Kirk wrote:
: Hi all,
:
: Just put Debian on a second PC and having problems telnetting in from work.
:
: Trying 10.0.0.2...
: Connected to 10.0.0.2.
: Escape character is '^]'.
: Connection closed by foreign host.
:
: Anyone know why I'm not getting a
1. dpkg --status telnetd
if not installed = install
(in my case this was the problem - apparently by default it is not installed)
2. check /etc/inetd.conf for lines:
ftp stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd
/usr/sbin/in.ftpd
telnet stream tcp nowait
Hmm.
I think its because 10.x.x.x domains are not routable.
John
-Original Message-
From: Nathan E Norman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 10:18 AM
To: Patrick Kirk
Cc: Debian User List
Subject: Re: telnet not working on home LAN
On Wed, 3 Nov
Thanks.
To solve your problem, comment out the line ALL: PARANOID from
/etc/hosts.deny
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.midco.net
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP Key: (0xA33B86E9)
--
Unsubscribe?
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, John Davis wrote:
: Hmm.
:
: I think its because 10.x.x.x domains are not routable.
Sure they are. They're just not supposed to be routed across the
Internet.
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
301 - 400 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
