On 02/17/2011 03:04 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:33:08 -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
I really like remmina, but I have run into an inconvenience. If I use
remmina directly on a local system the remote desktop sessions on
Windows clients are very responsive. But when I use an SSH
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 10:15 -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
snip
Use of compression had a discernible effect. To be honest I really
didn't expect it to help. This is a pretty fast network. It's still
slower than tsclient, but it's acceptable now. Without compression the
screen drawing
On 02/18/2011 10:21 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 10:15 -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
snip
Use of compression had a discernible effect. To be honest I really
didn't expect it to help. This is a pretty fast network. It's still
slower than tsclient, but it's acceptable
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:33:08 -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
I really like remmina, but I have run into an inconvenience. If I use
remmina directly on a local system the remote desktop sessions on
Windows clients are very responsive. But when I use an SSH -X session to
connect to my remote
On 02/17/2011 03:04 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:33:08 -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
I really like remmina, but I have run into an inconvenience. If I use
remmina directly on a local system the remote desktop sessions on
Windows clients are very responsive. But when I use an SSH
5 matches
Mail list logo