On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:55:25PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-09-05 16:01, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 01:56:30PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>* play the ball not the man - don't engage in disguised personal
> >>attacks
> >
> >Yes, pretty
On 2021-09-05, wrote:
>
>
>> * play the ball not the man - don't engage in disguised personal attacks
>
> Yes, pretty please.
>
Yep. Never disguise your personal attacks.
On 2021-09-05 16:01, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 01:56:30PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
[...]
* play the ball not the man - don't engage in disguised personal
attacks
Yes, pretty please.
Thank you, Andrew.
I'm the original poster. It might help if I explain.
Not
On 2021-09-05 16:01, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 01:56:30PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
[...]
* play the ball not the man - don't engage in disguised personal
attacks
Yes, pretty please.
Thank you, Andrew.
I am the OP
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 01:56:30PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
[...]
> * play the ball not the man - don't engage in disguised personal attacks
Yes, pretty please.
Thank you, Andrew.
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 03:09:59PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:54:02PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > As a non-professional sysadmin, this "Brian person" is wondering why
> > the OP's question (clearly relating to saned) is sidelined in favour
> > of other concerns.
>
> I'm
On 2021-09-03 00:21, Brian wrote:
On Fri 03 Sep 2021 at 00:03:08 +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-09-02 23:28, Brian wrote:
[...]
> Please go back and read your very first post. You asked three questions.
> Which one has not been answered?
Please understand you are talking to an idiot,
On Fri 03 Sep 2021 at 00:03:08 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-09-02 23:28, Brian wrote:
[...]
> > Please go back and read your very first post. You asked three questions.
> > Which one has not been answered?
>
> Please understand you are talking to an idiot, you have to say things slowly
>
On 2021-09-02 23:28, Brian wrote:
On Thu 02 Sep 2021 at 21:06:59 +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-09-02 17:57, Brian wrote:
> Regarding Greg Wooledge's exhortations to provide information about
> an issue: You were asked explicity to provide some; you never did.
> As it happens, I do not
On Thu 02 Sep 2021 at 21:06:59 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-09-02 17:57, Brian wrote:
>
> > Regarding Greg Wooledge's exhortations to provide information about
> > an issue: You were asked explicity to provide some; you never did.
> > As it happens, I do not think the problems you have
On 2021-09-02 17:57, Brian wrote:
Regarding Greg Wooledge's exhortations to provide information about
an issue: You were asked explicity to provide some; you never did.
As it happens, I do not think the problems you have encountered
have anything to do with saned. You have picked the wrong
On Thu 02 Sep 2021 at 17:05:10 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-09-02 16:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:13:34PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > I'll just presume you are grumpy because you have had the jab.
> >
> > Please stop.
> >
> > Take a breath. In. Out.
> >
>
On 2021-09-02 16:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:13:34PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
I'll just presume you are grumpy because you have had the jab.
Please stop.
Take a breath. In. Out.
Now: what is the problem you're experiencing? Start with a high level
description: "My
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:13:34PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> I'll just presume you are grumpy because you have had the jab.
Please stop.
Take a breath. In. Out.
Now: what is the problem you're experiencing? Start with a high level
description: "My scanner doesn't work", for example.
After
On 2021-09-02 10:53, Curt wrote:
On 2021-09-01, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-09-01 16:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:06:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-09-01 15:15, Brian wrote:
> * saned is socket activated.
> * saned@.service manages saned instances.
> *
On 2021-09-01, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-09-01 16:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:06:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
>>> On 2021-09-01 15:15, Brian wrote:
>>> > * saned is socket activated.
>>> > * saned@.service manages saned instances.
>>> > * saned.service is masked
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:54:02PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> As a non-professional sysadmin, this "Brian person" is wondering why
> the OP's question (clearly relating to saned) is sidelined in favour
> of other concerns.
I'm not sure *what* the OP's question really is. They're on an X-Y
tangent
On Wed 01 Sep 2021 at 13:52:21 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:06:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> >
> > Do you think your init system has some way to know WHY it was given a
> > command? And that it stores these reasons somewhere, and can cough
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:52:21PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:06:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> >
> > Do you think your init system has some way to know WHY it was given a
> > command? And that it stores these reasons somewhere, and can cough
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:06:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
>
> Do you think your init system has some way to know WHY it was given a
> command? And that it stores these reasons somewhere, and can cough them
> up on demand?
Speaking as a professional sysadmin, I would
On 2021-09-01 16:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:06:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-09-01 15:15, Brian wrote:
> * saned is socket activated.
> * saned@.service manages saned instances.
> * saned.service is masked because it is an empty file.
> * The file is empty to
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:06:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-09-01 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > * saned is socket activated.
> > * saned@.service manages saned instances.
> > * saned.service is masked because it is an empty file.
> > * The file is empty to allow all instances to be managed
On 2021-09-01 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 23:15:22 +0100, Brian wrote:
On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 15:27:13 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > The OP doesn't say whether he can scan or or not.
> >
> > He could give the name of
On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 23:15:22 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 15:27:13 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > The OP doesn't say whether he can scan or or not.
> > >
> > > He could give the name of the scanner he is
On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 15:27:13 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 14:48:02 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:31:22PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > > On 2021-08-31 18:49, john doe wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 14:48:02 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:31:22PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > On 2021-08-31 18:49, john doe wrote:
> > > > You can simply 'unmask' it and see how it goes.
> > >
> > > Is
On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 14:48:02 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:31:22PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > On 2021-08-31 18:49, john doe wrote:
> > > You can simply 'unmask' it and see how it goes.
> >
> > Is there a way to find out why it is masked ?
>
> Starting from a point
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:31:22PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-08-31 18:49, john doe wrote:
> > You can simply 'unmask' it and see how it goes.
>
> Is there a way to find out why it is masked ?
Starting from a point of zero context? Probably not.
You MIGHT be able to scroll back through
On 2021-08-31 18:49, john doe wrote:
On 8/31/2021 7:36 PM, mick crane wrote:
Since I didn't really need LVM and I wasn't thrilled with having the
intrid.img at 70,00 bytes big I installed bookworm afresh.
After installing all the software I might want it's grown from
13,00
to
On 8/31/2021 7:36 PM, mick crane wrote:
Since I didn't really need LVM and I wasn't thrilled with having the
intrid.img at 70,00 bytes big I installed bookworm afresh.
After installing all the software I might want it's grown from 13,00
to 30,00 but that's OK.
Most things are back
30 matches
Mail list logo
