[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ich gestehe, ziemlich im System gewütet zu haben :-(
Den Fehler habe ich auch gemacht genau EINmal. Aber aus Fehlern lernt
man ja bekanntilich ;)
Richte modutils ein (2.4.26-1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/modutils.postinst: line 52: update-modules: command
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 14:56, Frank A. Uepping wrote:
does someone know a package for the new modutils for Woody?
Adrian Bunk has them, backports.org too
http://www.apt-get.org/search.php?query=module-init-toolssubmit=arch%5B%5D=i386arch%5B%5D=all
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LeVA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have noticed that when I load a module the
/etc/modutils/module_name files, which conatins the post-install
lines, doesn't run.
So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a
/etc/modutils/emu10k1 file, which contains this line:
post-install emu10k1
David Z Maze rta:
LeVA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have noticed that when I load a module the
/etc/modutils/module_name files, which conatins the post-install
lines, doesn't run.
So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a
/etc/modutils/emu10k1 file, which contains this line:
post-install
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:01:09PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
Hello!
I have noticed that when I load a module the /etc/modutils/module_name
files, which conatins the post-install lines, doesn't run.
So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a /etc/modutils/emu10k1
file, which contains this
--- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Because, as of kernel 2.5.48 the kernel modules now end in .ko and have a
completely different internal structure. The new module-init-tools does
not
handle old style modules, but recognizes and passes them on to modutils.
The old modutils
--- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
modultils -- kernel 2.5.48
module-init-tools -- kernel = 2.5.48
Of course, module if module-init-tools finds an earlier kernel, it passes
the
work on to the old version.
They are still almost the same, except for the check whether
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:59, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
--- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
modultils -- kernel 2.5.48
module-init-tools -- kernel = 2.5.48
Of course, module if module-init-tools finds an earlier kernel, it passes
the
work on to the old version.
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:59, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
--- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
modultils -- kernel 2.5.48
module-init-tools -- kernel = 2.5.48
Of course, module if module-init-tools finds an earlier kernel, it passes
the
work on to the old version.
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 00:26, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
--- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
It seems that modutils and module-init-tools are duplicating most of the
work.
Both of them do some check as of the kernel's ability to load modules,
module-init-tools also checks for
--- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
It seems that modutils and module-init-tools are duplicating most of the
work.
Both of them do some check as of the kernel's ability to load modules,
module-init-tools also checks for /proc/modules.
Then both run depmod, modutils does a bit more
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
the following message:
Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:37:13AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
| My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
| the following message:
|
| Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
| depmod: Unexpected value (20)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
the following message:
Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
the following message:
Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
ieee1394_device_size
Known bug. The modutils package maintainer reduced the severity from
grave to important, so the
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
What version of modutils are you using?
ii modutils 2.3.11-13.1Linux module utilities.
Running on stable Debian.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux bdg 2.4.4 #6 Fri May 4 11:53:01 JAVT 2001 i686 unknown
Oki
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Oki DZ said:
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
What version of modutils are you using?
ii modutils 2.3.11-13.1Linux module utilities.
,[ /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes ]
| Current Minimal Requirements
|
|
| Upgrade to at *least*
Thomas Weinbrenner wrote:
,[ /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes ]
| Current Minimal Requirements
|
|
| Upgrade to at *least* these software revisions before thinking you've
| encountered a bug! If you're unsure what version you're currently
| running, the
On Wed, 23 May 2001 12:33:12 +0700, Oki DZ writes:
It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
having unstable libs on a stable machine? Well, actually, my question
is: what unstable packages do you have to install on a stable machine in
order to have the machine
Oki DZ wrote:
It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
having unstable libs on a stable machine?
Why not compile your own modutils package from the sources in unstable?
You don't need to upgrade glibc then.
Well, actually, my question
is: what unstable
Robert Waldner wrote:
There´s a FAQ on www.debian.org about that, see
http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
I see, it's already on the homepage...
Well, I think it's time to have a new feature on apt-get; it has to
print something like:
Hi, wanna hear some news before continuing? [Y/n]
and
Matthew Dalton wrote:
Oki DZ wrote:
It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
having unstable libs on a stable machine?
Why not compile your own modutils package from the sources in unstable?
You don't need to upgrade glibc then.
Instructions for this are
Robert Waldner wrote:
There´s a FAQ on www.debian.org about that, see
http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
OK, I've upgraded all the necessary packages; now depmod works fine.
Thanks a lot.
BTW, I see some conflicting programs; those on net-tools and netbase.
debsums net-tools would
On Wed, 23 May 2001 09:29:05 +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
** Hi,
**
** If I did depmod -a then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
** in size.
**
** Pretty interesting... if modules.dep's size is 0, then no module could
** be loaded.
** What could be the cause?
** I have
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:29:05AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
Hi,
If I did depmod -a then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
in size.
Pretty interesting... if modules.dep's size is 0, then no module could
be loaded.
What could be the cause?
I have reinstalled modutils two times
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:29:05AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
If I did depmod -a then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
in size.
What version of modutils are you using?
noah
--
___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public
Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
Hace poco he hecho el paso de 2.2r0 a 2.2r1 y además he actualizado de
Woody (con sus dependencias):
-binutils
-util-linux
-modutils
-e2fsprogs
-pcmcia-cs
Pues no sé cómo funcionará el modutils de woody, pero supongo que te
funcionará mi esquema en potato.
On Sat, 26 Sep 1998, Alan Eugene Davis wrote:
: I have been getting streams of messages as follows:
:
: Sep 26 18:40:01 mwariker modprobe: can't locate module char-major-14
: Sep 26 18:40:12 mwariker last message repeated 38 times
Add the following line to /etc/conf.modules or the
I was worried yesterday that I would not be able to boot the box, but the
upgrade went quite well. Thanks, Debian.
On that box dselect shows:
-**modules
***modutils
and does not have a modules.prerm.
My box at home shows
***modules
***modutils
and modules.prerm has no
On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Lindsay Allen wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade modules to modutils but dpkg says:
Kernel was compiled with module support
Modules package cannot be removed
Ideas? I'm in the field at the moment.
Yes. This one can be solved by hand with dpkg. You need to ftp the
Syrus,
Many thanks - you got me out of a bit of a hole, there.
dpkg now says that modutils is installed, but I notice that
/dev/init.d/boot still refers to modutils. Hope this is OK.
Lindsay
On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Lindsay Allen wrote:
I'm
I'm trying to upgrade modules to modutils but dpkg says:
Kernel was compiled with module support
Modules package cannot be removed
Ideas? I'm in the field at the moment.
What I did was to edit the modules.prerm file in /var/lib/dpkg/info and
delete the check described above. Then the
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
A warning to everyone trying to run new kernels: the current modutils
implementation does not work with the latest kernel recent. For the
stable kernels everything up to and including 2.0.29 seems to work
fine. 2.0.30 however does not work. For the 2.1 series there is
On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
A warning to everyone trying to run new kernels: the current modutils
implementation does not work with the latest kernel recent. For the
stable kernels everything up to and including 2.0.29 seems to work
fine.
35 matches
Mail list logo
