On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:28:29 -0500 (EST), David Goodenough wrote:
> Actually the problem is (as I have pointed out in the bug report) worse
> that this, because while the kernel has been updated to take note of
> the HPA, the tools such as *parted have not. So if your disk has an HPA
> and you try
On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
> 2010/3/5 David Goodenough :
> > On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
> >> 2010/3/5 David Goodenough
:
> >> > On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
> >> >> 2010/3/4 Mike Dresser
:
> >> >> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
>
2010/3/5 David Goodenough :
> On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
>> 2010/3/5 David Goodenough :
>> > On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
>> >> 2010/3/4 Mike Dresser :
>> >> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
>> >> >> hda: Host Protected Area detected.
>> >> >> ^Icurren
On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
> 2010/3/5 David Goodenough :
> > On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
> >> 2010/3/4 Mike Dresser :
> >> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
> >> >> hda: Host Protected Area detected.
> >> >> ^Icurrent capacity is 268435455 sectors (137
2010/3/5 David Goodenough :
> On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
>> 2010/3/4 Mike Dresser :
>> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
>> >> hda: Host Protected Area detected.
>> >> ^Icurrent capacity is 268435455 sectors (137438 MB)
>> >> ^Inative capacity is 312581808 sectors (16
On Friday 05 March 2010, consul tores wrote:
> 2010/3/4 Mike Dresser :
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
> >> hda: Host Protected Area detected.
> >> ^Icurrent capacity is 268435455 sectors (137438 MB)
> >> ^Inative capacity is 312581808 sectors (160041 MB)
> >
> > Is this a PATA dri
2010/3/4 Mike Dresser :
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
>
>> hda: Host Protected Area detected.
>> ^Icurrent capacity is 268435455 sectors (137438 MB)
>> ^Inative capacity is 312581808 sectors (160041 MB)
>
> Is this a PATA drive, and from there, has a jumper on the back for LBA48?
>
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
hda: Host Protected Area detected.
^Icurrent capacity is 268435455 sectors (137438 MB)
^Inative capacity is 312581808 sectors (160041 MB)
Is this a PATA drive, and from there, has a jumper on the back for LBA48?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Thursday 04 March 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:58:02 -0500 (EST), David Goodenough wrote:
> > I found Host Protected Area on Google, and it said I could turn it off
> > using hdparm, but when I try it says:-
> >
> > hdparm -N /dev/hda
> >
> > /dev/hda:
> > The running kern
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:58:02 -0500 (EST), David Goodenough wrote:
> I found Host Protected Area on Google, and it said I could turn it off
> using hdparm, but when I try it says:-
>
> hdparm -N /dev/hda
>
> /dev/hda:
> The running kernel lacks CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL support for this device.
> READ
On Thursday 04 March 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
> On Thursday 04 March 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
> > I have a hard drive with a primary partition and an extended partiton.
> > QTParted says that it has /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda5 which is
> > what one would expect, but when I boot the
On Thursday 04 March 2010, David Goodenough wrote:
> I have a hard drive with a primary partition and an extended partiton.
> QTParted says that it has /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda5 which is
> what one would expect, but when I boot the disk the kernel reports
> that there are only the /dev/hda
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:57:58 -0500 (EST), Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:44:10 -0500 (EST), David Goodenough wrote:
>>> I have a hard drive with a primary partition and an extended partiton.
>>> QTParted says that it has /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/h
>> I have a hard drive with a primary partition and an extended partiton.
>> QTParted says that it has /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda5 which is
>> what one would expect, but when I boot the disk the kernel reports
>> that there are only the /dev/hda1 and /dev/hda2 partitons, no /dev/hda5.
> Wha
In <134597558.16750431267720927300.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com>,
Stephen Powell wrote:
>On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:44:10 -0500 (EST), David Goodenough wrote:
>> I have a hard drive with a primary partition and an extended partiton.
>> QTParted says that it has /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda5
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:44:10 -0500 (EST), David Goodenough wrote:
>
> I have a hard drive with a primary partition and an extended partiton.
> QTParted says that it has /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda5 which is
> what one would expect, but when I boot the disk the kernel reports
> that there are o
On Thursday 04 March 2010, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, David Goodenough
>
> wrote:
> > I have a hard drive with a primary partition and an extended partiton.
> > QTParted says that it has /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda5 which is
> > what one would expect, but whe
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, David Goodenough
wrote:
> I have a hard drive with a primary partition and an extended partiton.
> QTParted says that it has /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda5 which is
> what one would expect, but when I boot the disk the kernel reports
> that there are only the /
18 matches
Mail list logo
