Lo que observas es que intentas instalar un paquete que no existe.
Así de simple.
Puedes hacer
apt search libfreetype | grep freestyle
Y válida que valor sale e instala el correcto.
El vie, 23 de sep. de 2022 11:56 a. m., Gonzalo Rivero <
fishfromsa...@gmail.com> escribió:
> holas
> El sáb,
holas
El sáb, 17-09-2022 a las 09:49 +0200, Camaleón escribió:
> El 2022-09-16 a las 21:50 -0300, Gonzalo Rivero escribió:
>
> > Holas,
> > tengo el siguiente sources.list para un debian 11:
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bullseye main contrib
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/
El 2022-09-16 a las 21:50 -0300, Gonzalo Rivero escribió:
> Holas,
> tengo el siguiente sources.list para un debian 11:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bullseye main contrib
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bullseye-updates main contrib
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security
On 08.09.21 21:12, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 08:28:18PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote:
>> On 08.09.21 16:50, Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Are you using a dnssec validating resolver?
>>>
>>> It'd be nice of somebody that understands dnssec would double-check,
>>> but it looks like name lookups
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 08:28:18PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote:
> On 08.09.21 16:50, Lee wrote:
>
> > Are you using a dnssec validating resolver?
> >
> > It'd be nice of somebody that understands dnssec would double-check,
> > but it looks like name lookups for security.debian.org has dnssec
> >
On 08.09.21 16:50, Lee wrote:
> Are you using a dnssec validating resolver?
>
> It'd be nice of somebody that understands dnssec would double-check,
> but it looks like name lookups for security.debian.org has dnssec
> enabled and not enabled for deb.debian.org
deb.debian.org is a CNAME and
On 9/6/21, Jim Popovitch wrote:
[.. snip lots ..]
> security.d.o and deb.d.o are both hosted on fastly servers, albeit
> different sets of servers. What is interesting to me is that the DNS for
> security.d.o is operated by Debian whereas the DNS for deb.d.o is run by
> fastly. I'm not sure
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 07:29:19PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On September 6, 2021 5:05:45 PM UTC, Steve Dondley wrote:
> > On 2021-09-06 05:53 AM, riveravaldez wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> > > wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I
On September 6, 2021 5:05:45 PM UTC, Steve Dondley wrote:
> On 2021-09-06 05:53 AM, riveravaldez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> > wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I think I'm finding myself with
> > kinda four options for the security line
On 2021-09-06 05:53 AM, riveravaldez wrote:
Hi,
after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I think I'm finding myself with
kinda four options for the security line in /etc/apt/sources.list
Those being:
deb
On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 08:34:44 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
[...]
> Also, there's the wee little fact that testing is no longer a synonym
> for bullseye, and therefore even if the fourth one *did* work, it
> wouldn't be equivalent to the other three.
With only
http://security.debian.org
On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 08:34:44 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 06:53:25 -0300, riveravaldez wrote:
> > > after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> > > wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I think I'm
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 06:53:25 -0300, riveravaldez wrote:
> > after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> > wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I think I'm finding myself with
> > kinda four options for the security line in
On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 11:21:03 +0100, Brian wrote:
[...]
> I've always thought contrib and non-free as not being supported by
> the security team.
I think I'll change my mind. The result of self-education follows: :)
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#contrib
...If it is possible to fix
I use de 2n one with no problems.
My sources.list:
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable-security main non-free contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main non-free contrib
Since in http://security.debian.org/dists/stable-security/ there is non-free
floder, I keep it in my
On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 06:53:25 -0300, riveravaldez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I think I'm finding myself with
> kinda four options for the security line in /etc/apt/sources.list
> Those being:
>
> deb
On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 10:08:28 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 06:53:25AM -0300, riveravaldez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> > wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I think I'm finding myself with
> > kinda four options
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 06:53:25AM -0300, riveravaldez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I think I'm finding myself with
> kinda four options for the security line in /etc/apt/sources.list
> Those being:
>
> deb
bonjour
pas chez moi (FFOX 78.13.0esr). Le site est accessible.
Le 04/09/2021 à 09:29, rok a écrit :
bonjour,
http://refpersys.org/
est une connexion non sécurisées et est bloquée par firefox;
amitiés,
--
Erwann
Le 04/09/2021 à 08:06, Basile Starynkevitch a écrit :
Bonjour la liste,
Sur un portable x86-64 mon /etc/apt/sources.list (édité maintes fois à
la main) contient actuellement
guiseppe# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ testing
main
Le sam. 4 sept. 2021 09:49, Basile Starynkevitch
a écrit :
>
> On 9/4/21 9:29 AM, rok wrote:
> > bonjour,
>
Bonjour
> >
> > http://refpersys.org/
> >
> > est une connexion non sécurisées et est bloquée par firefox;
>
>
> Qui peut m'expliquer l'intérêt de HTTPS (encrypté) par rapport à HTTP
>
Pour les autres, voici mon /etc/apt/sources.list qui marche (en Île de
France à Bourg La Reine)
# fichier /etc/apt/sources.list sur guiseppe
deb http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ testing
main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/
On 9/4/21 9:29 AM, rok wrote:
bonjour,
http://refpersys.org/
est une connexion non sécurisées et est bloquée par firefox;
Qui peut m'expliquer l'intérêt de HTTPS (encrypté) par rapport à HTTP
(textuel) sur un site web en lecture seule?
De mon point de vue, encrypter le protocole dans
bonjour,
http://refpersys.org/
est une connexion non sécurisées et est bloquée par firefox;
Le 4/09/21 à 08:06, Basile Starynkevitch a écrit :
Bonjour la liste,
Sur un portable x86-64 mon /etc/apt/sources.list (édité maintes fois à
la main) contient actuellement
guiseppe# cat
J'ai testé depuis chez moi.
guiseppe# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ testing main contrib
non-free
cette ligne ne passe pas, ce qui est d'ailleurs bizarre puisque le
fichier InRelease existe.
Mais je pense qu'elle est redondante avec
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> If you are running "eternal testing" (you never convert it to a stable
> release), then you HAVE NO security support. None. There is no line
> you should use for security, because there isn't any security.
false. security updates come via unstable uploads that
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
...
> 'testing' receives security updates via 'unstable', there is no separate=20
> repository.
>
> https://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
ok, thanks! :) i am fine with that.
i had an old line in the sources.list that no longer
was useful. got rid of that,
> >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
Which says "security suite renamed to bullseye-security (from
buster/updates)".
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 05:44:44PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> >> wishlist for an alias to testing so nobody who=20
> >> follows testing will need to keep changing their
> >>
On Du, 05 iul 20, 19:31:54, songbird wrote:
>
> i want the line that goes into the /etc/apt/sources.list
> file for testing security updates.
'testing' receives security updates via 'unstable', there is no separate
repository.
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
Kind regards,
Andrei
On 6/7/20 9:31 am, songbird wrote:
some time ago there was a change made to the sources
list names for security and i never saw the one for
testing come by (i may have missed it) so i'm asking...:)
Good afternoon
This is what my sources.list looked like when I first installed testing
Dan Ritter wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
...
>> >> wishlist for an alias to testing so nobody who=20
>> >> follows testing will need to keep changing their
>> >> sources.list every time there is a release.
>> >
>> > What more than the 'testing' alias are you looking for?
>>
songbird wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:38:05, songbird wrote:
> >> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >> > On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >> >>=3D20
> >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
> >> >
> >> > Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:38:05, songbird wrote:
>> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> > On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> >>=3D20
>> >> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
>> >
>> > Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm subscribed to -doc.
>>=20
>>
On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:38:05, songbird wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >>=20
> >> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
> >
> > Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm subscribed to -doc.
>
> wishlist for an alias to testing so
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>>=20
>> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
>
> Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm subscribed to -doc.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
wishlist for an alias to testing so nobody who
follows testing will
On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm subscribed to -doc.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 10:34:30AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 05 iul 20, 08:14:28, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I found several proposals for thre security entry
> >
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
> > deb
On Du, 05 iul 20, 08:14:28, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
>
> I found several proposals for thre security entry
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main contrib
> non-free
[fixed wrapping]
>
Am 05. Jul, 2020 schwätzte Pierre Frenkiel so:
moin moin Pierre,
I found several proposals for thre security entry
deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main contrib
non-free
deb
On 7/5/2020 8:14 AM, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
hi,
I found several proposals for thre security entry
deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main
contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/
On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 17:29 -0300, Fred Maranhão wrote:
> em 2017 a stretch assumiu o cargo de estável, e a jessie teve que
> ceder o lugar, mas foi ocupar o posto de oldstable. com isto, a wheezy
> teve que assumir o cargo de oldoldstable, mas ainda não estava morta.
> só velhinha e
você etá usando uma versão velha do debian.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_version_history
esta era a versão estável entre 2013 e 2015. em 2015 a jessie asumiu o
cargo de estável e a wheezy foi para o posto de oldstable (a antiga
estável). assim todos podiam calmamente migrar seus debians
Olá Paulo,
Faça o seguinte:
Substitua a versão wheezy pela stable que tenho certeza que irá resolver.
deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
Il 19/10/2017 18:12, don magnify ha scritto:
thanks... i did. same result...
You may want to run
# apt-get update
before your build-dep command.
Il 19/10/2017 19:29, don magnify ha scritto:
how dies this help with the "build-dep python-imaging --fix-missing" part?!
Because build-dep action needs to download source packages too. Since
you plan to install *build* dependencies, you need the sources (or at
least headers) of the
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Richard Hector
wrote:
> On 20/10/17 05:12, don magnify wrote:
> > thanks... i did. same result... is there any particular src endpoint
> > directly affecting the "build-dep python-imaging --fix-missing"
> > commands/flags?
> >
> >
On 20/10/17 05:12, don magnify wrote:
> thanks... i did. same result... is there any particular src endpoint
> directly affecting the "build-dep python-imaging --fix-missing"
> commands/flags?
>
> thanks...
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Steve Kemp
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Lucio Crusca wrote:
>
>
> Il 19/10/2017 12:00, don magnify ha scritto:
> > # sudo apt-get build-dep python-imaging --fix-missing
> >
> > get:
> >
> > "E: You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list"
>
> You need to add deb-src lines.
>
thanks... i did. same result... is there any particular src endpoint
directly affecting the "build-dep python-imaging --fix-missing"
commands/flags?
thanks...
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Steve Kemp wrote:
> >
> >#A sudo vi /etc/apt/sources.list
> >
> >shows
>
>#A sudo vi /etc/apt/sources.list
>
>shows this:
>
>deb http://cdn-aws.deb.debian.org/debian stretch main
Lines beginning with "deb" are used for binary packages. For
"source" packages you need a "deb-src" prefix. Something like
this:
deb-src
Il 19/10/2017 12:00, don magnify ha scritto:
> # sudo apt-get build-dep python-imaging --fix-missing
>
> get:
>
> "E: You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list"
You need to add deb-src lines.
https://debgen.simplylinux.ch/
El Fri, 08 Jul 2016 18:51:47 -0500, limpia escribió:
> Saludos,
> Gracias, Estaba pensando en publicar lo mismo, pero lo veo todo listo
> es contestada, por lo que sólo añadir, también utilizo este:
> https://archive.debian.net/squeeze-backports/
> Si me sierve buen, todos los
> paguettes por
Saludos,
Gracias, Estaba pensando en publicar lo mismo, pero lo veo todo listo
es contestada, por lo que sólo añadir, también utilizo este:
https://archive.debian.net/squeeze-backports/
Si me sierve buen, todos los
paguettes por Debian 6 y atraz
es en los archivos, de
El Fri, 08 Jul 2016 19:14:35 +0200, Ramses II escribió:
> Doy la solución:
>
> Dejar en el fichero "sources.list" la siguiente línea:
>
>
-
> # Para actualizar Debian 6.0 discontinuado deb
>
>-Mensaje original-
>De: listascor...@msjs.co [mailto:listascor...@msjs.co]
>Enviado el: viernes, 08 de julio de 2016 19:01
>Para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
>Asunto: Re: "sources.list" para Debian 6.0 Squeeze que funcione.
>
>El 08/07/16
El 08/07/16 a las 11:42, Ramses II escribió:
Hola a todo@s,
Tengo un Debian Squeeze (Debian 6.0) con el siguiente "sources.list":
--
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian squeeze main contrib
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main contrib
deb
Entonces nuevamente digo gracias.
El 11/06/16 a las 11:02, Camaleón escribió:
El Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:48:23 -0300, Marcelo Giordano escribió:
Corrijo el top-posting.
El 11/06/16 a las 10:40, Camaleón escribió:
Has secuestrado un hilo, abro uno nuevo.
(...)
No entiendo. Que significa
El Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:48:23 -0300, Marcelo Giordano escribió:
Corrijo el top-posting.
> El 11/06/16 a las 10:40, Camaleón escribió:
>> Has secuestrado un hilo, abro uno nuevo.
(...)
> No entiendo. Que significa secuestrar un hilo? Muchas gracias
Significa que has respondido a un correo en
Muy útil.
Muchas gracias
El 11/06/16 a las 10:40, Camaleón escribió:
dpkg -l | grep "~bpo"
No entiendo. Que significa secuestrar un hilo? Muchas gracias
El 11/06/16 a las 10:40, Camaleón escribió:
Has secuestrado un hilo, abro uno nuevo.
El Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:33:36 -0300, Marcelo Giordano escribió:
Hola amigos, agregué esta línea a mi soruces.list "deb
La última vez que ajusté los mirrors en Debian (testing), hará cosa
de seis meses, buscando que fueran lo más rápidos posible, el asunto
se reducía básicamente a:
$ man netselect-apt
y luego contrastar con estas dos páginas:
http://mirror.debian.org/status.html
El lunes, 2 mar 2015, a las 16:39 UTC+1 horas,
Carlos Zuniga escribió:
2015-02-28 1:43 GMT-05:00 JAWV WV jaw...@gmail.com:
Buenas es una pregunta simple que mirror es más eficiente para latinoamerica
. ¿cual es la configuración más adecuada para sources.list?
Gracias y buena semana !!!
Por
2015-02-28 1:43 GMT-05:00 JAWV WV jaw...@gmail.com:
Buenas es una pregunta simple que mirror es más eficiente para latinoamerica
. ¿cual es la configuración más adecuada para sources.list?
Gracias y buena semana !!!
Por estos días lo más sencillo es utilizar el redirector:
2015-02-28 1:43 GMT-05:00 JAWV WV jaw...@gmail.com:
Buenas es una pregunta simple que mirror es más eficiente para latinoamerica
. ¿cual es la configuración más adecuada para sources.list?
Gracias y buena semana !!!
--
A menudo unas pocas horas de Prueba y error podrán ahorrarte minutos
de
El 28/02/15 a las 02:13, JAWV WV escribió:
Buenas es una pregunta simple que mirror es más eficiente para
latinoamerica . ¿cual es la configuración más adecuada para sources.list?
Gracias y buena semana !!!
Pues a mi me va de perlas usando los repos Europeos (Alemania y Belgica)
y mira que
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 20:44:36 -0430
Jose Maldonado josemal...@gmail.com wrote:
Yo uso los repositorios de Brasil tienen buena velocidad en la region.
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
El sábado, 28 feb 2015, a las 12:50 UTC+1 horas,
Manolo Díaz escribió:
El sábado, 28 feb 2015, a las 07:43 UTC+1 horas,
JAWV WV escribió:
Buenas es una pregunta simple que mirror es más eficiente para
latinoamerica . ¿cual es la configuración más adecuada para sources.list?
Gracias y buena
El sábado, 28 feb 2015, a las 07:43 UTC+1 horas,
JAWV WV escribió:
Buenas es una pregunta simple que mirror es más eficiente para
latinoamerica . ¿cual es la configuración más adecuada para sources.list?
Gracias y buena semana !!!
Esa es una zona muy grande, es más que probable que no haya uno
Desde ecuador lo hago con el servidor kernel.org, me resultó muy rápido.
El Sat, 28 Feb 2015 01:43:56 -0500, JAWV WV escribió:
Buenas es una pregunta simple que mirror es más eficiente para
latinoamerica . ¿cual es la configuración más adecuada para
sources.list?
Pues seguramente alguno de EE.UU. En España nos pasa igual, los mejores
servidores de actualización
El Sat, 28 Feb 2015 01:43:56 -0500, JAWV WV escribió:
Buenas es una pregunta simple que mirror es más eficiente para
latinoamerica . ¿cual es la configuración más adecuada para
sources.list?
Latinoamérica es enorme, seguramente habrá muchos espejos por ahí
repartidos. Pese a ello quizá los
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/14 20:47, Bob Proulx wrote:
What is up with the */ and /**/ stuff?
The HTML version has it bold and italic. I suspect it's icedove trying
to be clever, and use 'formatting' in a 'plain text' format ...
Richard
-BEGIN PGP
Thanks, Bob. I think I would go for the /*http.debian.net */after
reading about it from your supplied link. And for the record, */ or **/
was unintentional and wasn't on my sources.list .
Muntasim-Ul-Haque
Muntasim-Ul-Haque wrote:
I use two repositories for Debian Wheezy for the same purpose. One
of them is HTTP and another one is FTP. My two alternatives
sources.list are as follows:
*/deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main/**/
/**/deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main/**/
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 09:20 -0300, P. J. wrote:
Oi,
2013/8/5, Ricardo Braz rickyb...@gmail.com:
Gostaria de saber qual o sources.list ideal/melhor para manter o debian
mais atualizado possivel sem perder a estabilidade.
Meus 2 centavos de contribuição... ;-D
[1]
Oi,
2013/8/5, Ricardo Braz rickyb...@gmail.com:
Gostaria de saber qual o sources.list ideal/melhor para manter o debian
mais atualizado possivel sem perder a estabilidade.
Depende, se vc é usuário desktop, tem acesso periódico a internet com
uma boa banda... recomendo usar a versão testing
não há. estabilidade e novidade são objetivos conflitantes. no extremo
da estabilidade temos o debian stable, mas com pouca novidade.
no outro lado temos o debian unstable, com muita novidade e pouca estabilidade.
você vai botar este sources.list num computador com que funções?
dependendo do que
e qual a experiência deste usuário com gnu/linux e debian?
e o que o usuário vai fazer? planilha? programação? jogos? edição de imagem?
se for um usuário muito básico, pode usar apenas as linhas oficiais da
stable no sources.list. se o usuário se sente incomodado com as
versões dos programas,
Eu recomendo stable, com backports.
Aqui você pode gerar uma source.list adequada à sua preferencia:
http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/
Em 05-08-2013 20:44, Fred Maranhão escreveu:
e qual a experiência deste usuário com gnu/linux e debian?
e o que o usuário vai fazer? planilha? programação?
Minha sugestão de sources.list:
deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
Aqui tem uma source.list , interessante pra você ter uma base de como ela
pode ficar...
https://sites.google.com/site/mydebiansourceslist/Home
Futuramente você pode montar a sua própria com as coisas que você gosta
Aconselho você viver no mundo stable , se não quer se incomodar muito ...
Faz
esse site pode gerar sources.list que contem linhas que não
representam repositórios reais. é sempre bom ler o wiki!
Em 21 de maio de 2013 16:37, Paulo Silva paulo...@gmail.com escreveu:
Existe um site que ajuda a gerar o sources.list para debian:
http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/
No dia 21 de
Em 22 de maio de 2013, 14:30h, Albino B Neto bino...@binoanb.eti.br
escreveu:
Olá,
Em 21 de maio de 2013 14:55, Richard Wagner
richardwas2...@yahoo.com.br escreveu:
Por acaso alguém pode me passar uma sources.list? :)
$ cat source.list
## Repositório Debian Multiarquitetura
deb
Em 26 de maio de 2013 07:32, Marcelo Santana
marcgsant...@yahoo.com.br escreveu:
deb-src [arch=i386,amd64] http://linorg.usp.br/debian/ experimental
main contrib non-free
Apenas uma correção. Conforme consta no howto existente na página wiki
do Debian [1], para utilizar o recurso de
Gere sua própria source meu caro!
http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/
__
Samuel
__
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:55:19 -0700
From: richardwas2...@yahoo.com.br
Subject: Sources.list
To: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Por acaso alguém pode me passar uma sources.list? :)
Grato
Em 21 de maio de 2013 14:55, Richard Wagner
richardwas2...@yahoo.com.br escreveu:
Por acaso alguém pode me passar uma sources.list? :)
$ cat source.list
## Repositório Debian Multiarquitetura
deb [arch=i386,amd64] http://linorg.usp.br/debian/ unstable main
contrib non-free
deb-src
deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
deb-src http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org wheezy main
essa e a que utilizo no meu note.
Utilizem esse cara aí embaixo, ele irá achar um mirror de melhor
velocidade usando a sua geolocalização
deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
, 21 de Maio de 2013 15:17
Assunto: Re: Sources.list
Utilizem esse cara aí embaixo, ele irá achar um mirror de melhor velocidade
usando a sua geolocalização
deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian wheezy-backports main contrib
non-free
deb-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian wheezy-backports main contrib
non-free
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib
Existe um site que ajuda a gerar o sources.list para debian:
http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/
No dia 21 de Maio de 2013 às 18:55, Richard Wagner
richardwas2...@yahoo.com.br escreveu:
Por acaso alguém pode me passar uma sources.list? :)
Grato
--
Paulo Silva paulo...@gmail.com
Em 21/05/13, Richard Wagnerrichardwas2...@yahoo.com.br escreveu:
Gente, obrigado pela boa vontade.
Luís, gostei do site.
Ainda não entendi muito esse lance de criar essa sources.list, mas enfim.
Obrigado a todos.
leia o manual
--
| .''`. A fé não dá respostas. Só impede perguntas.
| :
Esse site é bem intuitivo. Mas se precisar de uma dica de como usar eu
escrevi uma esses tempos atrás no VOL. Segue o link:
http://www.vivaolinux.com.br/dica/Gerando-sourceslist-para-o-Debian-de-forma-rapida-e-facil/
att
Gustavo
Em 2013-05-21 16:37, Paulo Silva escreveu:
Existe um site que
Para os que não conhecem, existe uma ferramenta que gera um source.list com
base no espelho mais rápido.
http://www.vivaolinux.com.br/dica/netselectapt-Encontre-o-servidor-apt-mais-perto-de-voce
Att,
Em 21 de maio de 2013 15:50, Gustavo gust...@logicus.com.br escreveu:
Esse site é bem
Gente que parte do documento[1] que enviei falando sobre o sources.list
vocês não entenderam?
Basicamente adiciona o conteúdo abaixo no seu sources.list e esqueçam as
maracutaias:
deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-updates main
Em 21 de maio de 2013 21:07, SLot slot...@gmail.com escreveu:
Gente que parte do documento[1] que enviei falando sobre o sources.list
vocês não entenderam?
a parte que fala do netselect eu não entendi.
e também a diferença entre debian.net e debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mi, 21 nov 12, 09:18:48, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
Hello List,
It is considered (well, actually it is) rude to hijack threads on
mailing lists.
According to my email
On Mi, 21 nov 12, 13:22:14, Tom Furie wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:18:48AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
Hello List,
It is considered (well, actually it is)
There is also the solution of creating a file containing the needed line
in /etc/apt/sources.list.d
All files here are virtually added to the sources.list file by apt* when
updating the package list.
Le Mer 21 novembre 2012 5:34, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
This WFM (works for me):
add the extra
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
Hello List,
It is considered (well, actually it is) rude to hijack threads on
mailing lists.
--
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
1 - 100 of 586 matches
Mail list logo