Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I have not said it is more “standard for terminals”, I have that it
> > is more “standard” fullstop. It is more standard by the virtue of
> > having worked for decades, C-Ins S-Ins S-Del existed way before the
> > C-C C-V C-X tryptich, and still working today in most
On 07/02/2024 19:20, Nicolas George wrote:
Max Nikulin (12024-02-07):
It may be a convention for applications other than terminals, however I am
unsure what "standard" means for terminals.
I have not said it is more “standard for terminals”, I have that it is
more “standard” fullstop. It is
> I have not said it is more “standard for terminals”, I have that it is
> more “standard” fullstop. It is more standard by the virtue of having
> worked for decades, C-Ins S-Ins S-Del existed way before the C-C C-V C-X
> tryptich, and still working today in most contexts.
Indeed, IIUC these key
Max Nikulin (12024-02-07):
> It may be a convention for applications other than terminals, however I am
> unsure what "standard" means for terminals.
I have not said it is more “standard for terminals”, I have that it is
more “standard” fullstop. It is more standard by the virtue of having
worked
4 matches
Mail list logo
