I saw another list member post that we should stay away from qpopper. I
haven't heard anything - either good or bad. Do you know what the
problem is with that daemon. My Debian machine is serving 600 or so
dial-up connections for mail (coming and going) and authentication. If I
need to switch for
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:38:04 -0500 (EST), Michael Roark wrote:
I saw another list member post that we should stay away from qpopper. I
haven't heard anything - either good or bad. Do you know what the
problem is with that daemon. My Debian machine is serving 600 or so
dial-up connections for mail
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:38:04 -0500 (EST), Michael Roark wrote:
It is just personal bias on my part against qpopper because of one
glaring oversight they made. In the non-standard (IIRC) pop send feature,
which I do use from time
On 9 Jun 1998 20:38:11 +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Have you bothered to file a bug report into the Debian Bug System
about this? Then it can be fixed you know ..
No. This was before I used Debian that I noticed it and also does not
relate to my Debian system as it is on my ISP's
4 matches
Mail list logo
