Re (2): new udev

2009-12-16 Thread peasthope
Folk, Observations from bystander. Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:21:28 -0500 Brian Nelson wrote, Some of the .rules files on your system are using a deprecated syntax, ... The message in syslog has a rather obscure way of putting that. Can't a syslog message be as direct as Brian has

Re: Re (2): new udev

2009-12-16 Thread Rick Pasotto
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:15:30AM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Folk, Observations from bystander. Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:21:28 -0500 Brian Nelson wrote, Some of the .rules files on your system are using a deprecated syntax, ... The message in syslog has a rather obscure way

Re: Re (2): new udev

2009-12-16 Thread Brian Nelson
On 12/16/2009 1:31 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:15:30AM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Folk, Observations from bystander. Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:21:28 -0500 Brian Nelson wrote, Some of the .rules files on your system are using a deprecated syntax, ... The

Re: Re (2): new udev

2009-12-16 Thread Tom H
Some of the .rules files on your system are using a deprecated syntax, ... The message in syslog has a rather obscure way of putting that. Can't a syslog message be as direct as Brian has stated it? ... and also your kernel isn't configured to udev's liking. Non-obvious details, easily

Re: Re (2): new udev

2009-12-16 Thread Brian Nelson
On 12/16/2009 2:52 PM, Tom H wrote: And yet the udev maintainer's response to the 'CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED syslog message is So do it. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560821 I assume that if you are using testing, you have to be prepared for problems and to make system changes.