Re (3): telnetd in Squeeze; was new authentication mechanism in Squeeze?

2010-06-14 Thread peasthope
From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.ne. Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:53:42 -0500 ... nmap dalton.invalid. Results are consistent with function of services. Joule also lacks /etc/pam.d/telnet but then Joule runs Lenny whereas Dalton runs Squeeze. joule:~# nmap dalton.invalid Starting Nmap

Re: Re (3): telnetd in Squeeze; was new authentication mechanism in Squeeze?

2010-06-14 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/14/2010 03:54 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: From: Ron Johnsonron.l.john...@cox.ne. Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:53:42 -0500 ... nmap dalton.invalid. Results are consistent with function of services. Doesn't seem so to me. Joule also lacks /etc/pam.d/telnet but then Joule runs Lenny

Re (3): telnetd in Squeeze; was new authentication mechanism in Squeeze?

2010-06-14 Thread peasthope
From: Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.or..il Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:45:16 + You try to login (from telnet) as root? Oh no. telnet as a user and then su. Isn't shorewall rather famous for producing not-so-efficient iptabnles rules? Recently it changed from shell based compiler to

Re: Re (3): telnetd in Squeeze; was new authentication mechanism in Squeeze?

2010-06-14 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/14/2010 04:22 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: From: Tzafrir Cohentzaf...@cohens.or..il Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:45:16 + You try to login (from telnet) as root? Oh no. telnet as a user and then su. Isn't shorewall rather famous for producing not-so-efficient iptabnles rules?

Re: Re (3): telnetd in Squeeze; was new authentication mechanism in Squeeze?

2010-06-14 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:54:46PM -0700, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Results are consistent with function of services. Joule also lacks /etc/pam.d/telnet but then Joule runs Lenny whereas Dalton runs Squeeze. /etc/pam.d/telnet ? telnetd authenticates using login, and hene /etc/pam.d/login ,