On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Glenn English wrote:
> Come on folks!
>
> Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
> hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
> computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
>
> OK.
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Pier wrote:
>
> It was ages I didn't write to the list but nfs always arouse curiosity ;)
> First try to force nfsv3 to see if permissions are ok (v3 uses numeric
> uid/gid) with 'mount -o vers=3'.
> If this works and you want to use nfsv4 then
> On Jan 2, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
>
> 1) Ditch webmin, I don't know what it is but it seems to break
> something that should be pretty simple to set up, without giving any
> feedback.
Webmin's one of those web-based GUI admin things. I use it because it
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Brandon Vincent wrote:
>
> I would return the server's idmapd.conf back to the default
> configuration (nobody:nogroup) and make sure that the idmapd service
> is running on both the server and the client. Make sure the domain
> matches in
On 01/02/2016 10:06 AM, Glenn English wrote:
Beats me, but it's working.
I modified the line in /etc/exports (all on one line) to:
/home/ghe/Finances
192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0(rw,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)
That isn't exactly as suggested, but there were mild complaints about
not
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:56 PM, ghe wrote:
> I changed the nobody name to myself (ghe) in /etc/idmapd.conf, and created a
> new user (gheqw). Now ls says the directory on the client is owned by
> gheqw:nogroup. That doesn't make any sense to me at all.
I would return the
On Friday, 1 January 2016, 21:57, Glenn English wrote:
Come on folks!
Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
OK. Leave
Come on folks!
Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
OK. Leave out (date) and (% not hungover), and tell me what I've done wrong...
> On Dec 31,
Strangely, putting a dns for the local zone (and forwarder for the rest)
improves the situation.
No cannot monitor in kern.log anymore ...
De : Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com
À : debian-user@lists.debian.org
Envoyé le : Mardi 20 Septembre 2011 21h46
Objet : Re: nfs
Stephane Durieux wrote:
I have messages like this in logs:
lockd cannot monitor ip_address
and also messages about statd
The lockd: cannot monitor messages are due to the kernel being unable
to communicate with the rpc.statd process. That usually indicates
that the rpc.statd is not running,
Kurian Thayil wrote:
Hi,
If I can remember correctly. Include the option no_root_squash
in /etc/exports of B. It will be like,
/home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check,no_root_squash)
You will be able to read-write as root if you include this
option.
This did not really work. To
Hi,
Machines A and B both run Debian. There are no firewall rules
blocking any kind of traffic A--B.
I try to mount, by means of nfs, a directory of B to a mount point
on A, read-write.
I can read the contents of /home/storage/video on B. But I cannot
write anything to it. I keep getting
Hi,
If I can remember correctly. Include the option no_root_squash in
/etc/exports of B. It will be like,
/home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check,no_root_squash)
You will be able to read-write as root if you include this option.
Regards,
Kurian Mathew Thayil.
On 10/30/08, Mirco Piccin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Samad put me on the right track to the solution. See comments in
line below.
snip
Other factors which may have a bearing on the situation: the BDS
computer is a P4; whereas the SOL is a dual core on a Foxconn
motherboard. Several other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And thanks also to Matthew M. -- sorry Matthew.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIkNNElNlJzOkJmTcRAi6IAJ92a316VPCAh0E47K4+J6wadeBCbgCggba9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In response to my message of 2008-07-28 on this subject M. Preud'homme
rightly intimated that I should have provided more information so that
he (and others?) could help me. So, here is the information he asked me
for, as well as the output of the
Hello,
You might try running
$ exportfs -r
on the host computer.
MM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As Matthew Moore suggested, after reading the relevant manual page to
see what command exportfs -r does, I ran on the server machine (SOL)
exportfs -rv, which returned the following:
exporting 192.168.0.0/24:/home/ken/mozilla
exporting
some thoughts inline
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:13:28PM -0400, Ken Heard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In response to my message of 2008-07-28 on this subject M. Preud'homme
rightly intimated that I should have provided more information so that
he (and others?)
Le lundi 28 juillet 2008, Ken Heard a écrit :
I have two boxes, one normally used by user A, and the other by user
B. I want to make it possible for user A to access his files from B's
computer, and vice versa.
So, in each computer I amended
1) file /etc/exports to export the relative
Ding Honghui wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nfs server 192.168.110.28
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 2.2T 1.6T 473G 78% /home
/etc/exports
/home/nfs_for_217 192.168.110.27/255.255.255.255 (rw,sync,no_root_squash)
nfs
--- Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Stephane Durieux wrote:
client - server -X- internet
That is exactly my issue . Excuse me for not being
clear ! Anyway, has somebody a solution .
I have read that client and server must be able to
make a reverse resolution of the client
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:47:14PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
I have noticed that my clients are not declared in
/etc/hosts if I put them in /etc/hosts (and in nis
table to be useful) everything is find.
Nevertheless I don t understand how the nfs can make a
resolution via dns of a a
Stephane Durieux wrote:
I have noticed that my clients are not declared in
/etc/hosts
They won't need to be if you use DNS. But it is acceptable to list
them in the local files. Local files override network DNS.
if I put them in /etc/hosts (and in nis table to be useful)
everything is
--- Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit
:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Bob Proulx
wrote:
Stephane Durieux wrote:
Of course the network connexion is good !
I can ping the server
But you said that the server cannot access the
network:
I encounter a
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
--- Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ?crit
I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
If the server has
not access to internet, they cannot mount
their directories !
I think what he means is that:
Stephane Durieux wrote:
client - server -X- internet
That is exactly my issue . Excuse me for not being
clear ! Anyway, has somebody a solution .
I have read that client and server must be able to
make a reverse resolution of the client and the
server, but I am not sure of it and I don t
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
Hello
I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
If the server has not access to internet, they cannot
mount their directories !
in what way is network access broken?
I have checked /etc/fstab
nfs server is
--- Andrew Sackville-West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Stephane
Durieux wrote:
Hello
I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
If the server has not access to internet, they
cannot
mount their directories !
in what way is network
Stephane Durieux wrote:
Of course the network connexion is good !
I can ping the server
But you said that the server cannot access the network:
I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has
not access to internet, they cannot mount their directories !
This is a
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Stephane Durieux wrote:
Of course the network connexion is good !
I can ping the server
But you said that the server cannot access the network:
I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has
not access to
Hallo Allerseits,
wie auch immer, ich habe aus meinem alten Ganten den Tip, bei Locking
Problemen den NFS-Kernel-Server zu verwenden. Jetzt läufts, wenn auch die
Performance des Kernel-Servers etwas schlechter ist.
jetzt vom
Am Samstag, 17. September 2005 16:58 schrieb Thomas Trueten:
Hallo
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Michael Gass wrote:
I am having a problem with a debian install using nfs and a floppy boot.
I am trying to install woody (bf2.4 flavor) on an old 486 with 24M ram
(Compaq Prolinea 4/66). I am using PLIP as the machine has no network
card and no cdrom.
.
nfs: server
Hallo GEORG,
Am 2004-07-12 15:31:41, schrieb georg leugner:
hallo,
ich habe ein problem mit nfs.
also zuerst zu meinem client system debian testing mit kernel 2.6.7.
Es gibt auch GROSSBUCHSTABEN auf der Tastatur.
Ich denke nicht, das hier irgendjemand allzuviel mit Deiner
Beschreibung etwas
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:40:34 +0200
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
Hallo Michelle,
'mutt' hat seit dem umzug allerdings Probleme, wenn ich eine
E-mail editieren will...
__
/
| Warte auf fcntl-Lock...
Hallo,
dachdem ich mit meinem Escalade und den Festplatten auf einen PII
umgezogen bin, konnte ich meinen selbstkompilierten Kernel nicht
mehr verwenden, weshalb ich den bf24 als default eingestellt habe.
Ich mounte den nfs-Server mit der option tcp !!!
Das wars !
Im standard bf24 kernel
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:33:13AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
| Warte auf fcntl-Lock... 1 2 3 4
| Konnte tempräre Mailbox nicht erzeugen: keine Berechtigung
naja, steht doch da, das Locking macht Probleme. Kontrollier mal den
rpc.lockd.
Grüße, Torsten
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und
Hallo,
sieht nach einem Probem mit dem locking aus. Welche Kernelversion verwendest Du? Hat
sich die eventuell auch geaendert? Hatte neulich aehnliche Probleme...
Verwendest Du den Kernel NFS oder User-Space NFS Daemon?
Cheers,
Jan
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
Am 2004-04-01 11:04:15, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo,
sieht nach einem Probem mit dem locking aus. Welche Kernelversion verwendest Du? Hat
sich die eventuell auch geaendert? Hatte neulich aehnliche Probleme...
Verwendest Du den Kernel NFS oder User-Space NFS Daemon?
Mein FileServer
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:01:06 -0500, Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other machine. I
am getting RPC error on other machine and it says (Host linux box)
is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux box from there and
also I can telnet
BTW, is there still a way to mount a windows dirtree via nfs ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 27 October 2003 22:01, Vivek Kumar wrote:
I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other
machine. I am getting RPC error on other machine and it says
(Host linux box) is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux
box from there and also I can telnet ot it.
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 05:31, gerard wrote:
Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
mount an nfs drive this is the error I get mount: RPC: Unable to
receive; errno = Connection refused. Any ideas? I havent changed
anything either, thats why I find it strange.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote:
Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
mount an nfs drive this is the error I get mount: RPC: Unable to
receive; errno = Connection refused. Any ideas? I havent changed
anything either, thats why I find
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote:
Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
mount an nfs drive this is the error I get mount: RPC: Unable to
receive; errno = Connection refused. Any ideas?
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else
downgrade to 1.0.3-1.
# dpkg -l | grep nfs
ii nfs-common 1.0.3-2 NFS support files common to client and serve
ii
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 12:08, Dave Carrigan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else
downgrade to 1.0.3-1.
# dpkg -l | grep nfs
ii nfs-common
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:39:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Thanks. Does sid's 1.0.5-1 work?
Yes, seems to be working for me.
--
Dave Carrigan
Seattle, WA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.rudedog.org/ | ICQ:161669680
UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-C++-DNS-PalmOS-PostgreSQL-MySQL
Bart Lenoir wrote:
Hi,
I'm running an NFS server on Red Hat.
Connected to the Red Hat I have a Debian
which I want to use as an NFS client.
Ping, Ftp, Telnet, ... all seems fine.
Mount and Umount is working well, however
I don't have access to the selected directory.
Permission denied. The only
Hallo,
* On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:15:41PM +0200, Pedro Sanfilo wrote:
Sonderzeichen sollte man nicht in ein Subjekt setzen!
Danke Leute hatt mir alles
sehr viel weiter geholfen ! !
Schoen und Sinvoller, zB fuer Andere User/Listenarchiv, ist statt
eine Dankesmail eine kleine Beschreibung
Hallo Pedro,
kann mir mal jemand verraten wie der mount befehl für
das mounten einer cd via nfs aussieht
ich erhalte andauernd fehelermeldungen
so in ner art /cdrom is not a block device
oder
mount: 192.168.0.20:/dev/cdrom failed, reason given by server: Not a directory
meine exports shaut
Am Son, 2003-06-15 um 13.28 schrieb Pedro Sanfilo:
mount: 192.168.0.20:/dev/cdrom failed, reason given by server: Not a directory
so geht das nicht ...
meine exports shaut eigentlich ganz einfach aus:
/share 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 (rw,insecure,no_root_squash)
/cdrom
Am Son, 2003-06-15 um 17.58 schrieb Pedro Sanfilo:
sagt mal muss ich immer wenn ich den cd-inhalt am clienten lesen
möchte am SERVER ein mount /cdrom vorher ausführen
sicher ...
oder gibts irgendeine möglichkeit
alles vom clienten aus zu mounten wie die cd am server
und dann hallt /cdrom
Hallo Pedro,
Pedro Sanfilo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sagt mal muss ich immer wenn ich den cd-inhalt am clienten lesen
möchte am SERVER ein mount /cdrom vorher ausführen
oder gibts irgendeine möglichkeit
alles vom clienten aus zu mounten wie die cd am server
und dann hallt /cdrom nach /mnt
Moin,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:58:06 +0200 Pedro Sanfilo wrote:
--jetzt hatts auch geklapt (/cdrom-lies sichnach /mnt mounten
verz. war aber leer) --
sagt mal muss ich immer wenn ich den cd-inhalt am clienten lesen
möchte am SERVER ein mount /cdrom vorher ausführen
oder gibts irgendeine
Hall Martin,
Am 00:14 2003-01-27 +0100 hat Martin =?iso-8859-15?q?H=F6fling?=
geschrieben:
Hallo erstmal,
sagt mal, weiss jemand, ob folgende Fehlermeldung damit zusammenhängen
kann,
dass ich mein /home via nfs gemountet habe:
fcntl: Permission denied
fcntl: Keine Berechtigung
Ich hab mal
Martin Höfling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sagt mal, weiss jemand, ob folgende Fehlermeldung damit zusammenhängen kann,
dass ich mein /home via nfs gemountet habe:
fcntl: Permission denied
fcntl: Keine Berechtigung
Ich hab mal danach gegoogelt, aber auf den ersten Blick nichts ähnliches
Hallo,
ich habe gerade den Server rebootet (schade fuer die uptime), jetzt
klappt alles wieder. Manuelles Neustarten des NFS-Servers und ein
/etc/init.d/networking restart half leider nicht.
Bene
--
Benedikt Kaleß Tel.: 02403/29842
Hehlrather Str. 88
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 07:47:20PM +0100, Martin Troeger wrote:
um meinem Anonymous-FTP mehrere Verzeichnisse zur Verfügung zu stellen,
möchte ich diese per NFS in das Homeverzeichnis vom user ftp mounten.
Beim Mounten wärend des Bootvergangs gibt er mir die Fehlermeldung aus:
RPC: Program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. März 2002 17:14 schrieb Martin Troeger:
Kann ich denn Proftpd anderweitig beibringen, Verzeichnisse außerhalb
der chroot-Umgebung anzuzeigen?
mount --bind /PFAD /ZIEL
Dies geht aber nicht mit einem 2.2er Kernel.
Sebastian
- --
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:52:20 -0600
Dimitri Maziuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Axel Boyrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
Hi,
I am using Woody. I mount NFS directory from Solaris 2.8 where files are
owed by nobody.nobody
once NFS mounted on Woody, with the kernel 2.2.20 files
* Axel Boyrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
Hi,
I am using Woody. I mount NFS directory from Solaris 2.8 where files are owed
by nobody.nobody
once NFS mounted on Woody, with the kernel 2.2.20 files appear as own by
nobody.nogroup
But with kernel 2.4.17 files appear with a uid
Nicolas Lamirault said:
hi debian users
somebody have an idea to correct me in my config ?
thanks
sounds like a permissions issue. what userid are you
trying to view the files as? either make sure that
that userid(the numerical id) has access to those files
or turn on the no_root_squash
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:05:44PM +0200, Alexander Gun uttered:
May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: nsm_mon_unmon: rpc failed, status=-13
May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: lockd: cannot monitor 192.168.13.100
May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: lockd: failed to monitor 192.168.13.100
Make sure
Thanks for your help!
I was my fault that it didn't work. I made a mistake
when I tied to mount the nfs because I didn't enter the same directory that I
had int the other computer in the /etc/exports. That's why it didn't work.
Thanks again!
Robert
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Jens
Use a FQDN instead of IP. For some reason it seems /etc/exports doesn't like
IPs.
Horvath Robert wrote:
Hi,
I might be dumb but I have installed the nfs-server package and my
/etc/exports is as follows on the computer 152.66.73.163:
# /etc/exports: the access control list for filesystems
Use a FQDN instead of IP. For some reason it seems /etc/exports doesn't like
IPs.
my /etc/exports (excerpts):
# /etc/exports: the access control list for filesystems which may be exported
# / 152.30.5.6 (rw)
/ 152.30.5.2 (rw,root_squash,map_daemon)
/home/elentari 152.30.5.2 (rw,
67 matches
Mail list logo