On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:37:54 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 22 Jun 2019 at 22:31:48 (-0400), Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:53:52 -0500 David Wright
> > wrote:
> > > But what eliminates it for me as a general viewer is the lack of key-
> > > binding configuration file. Quoting
On Sat 22 Jun 2019 at 22:31:48 (-0400), Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:53:52 -0500 David Wright
> wrote:
> > But what eliminates it for me as a general viewer is the lack of key-
> > binding configuration file. Quoting Archwiki,
> > "Navigation within a document works with standard
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:53:52 -0500
David Wright wrote:
...
> But what eliminates it for me as a general viewer is the lack of key-
> binding configuration file. Quoting Archwiki,
> "Navigation within a document works with standard keyboard shortcuts
>and mouse interaction. For example, B
On Sat 15 Jun 2019 at 07:51:22 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2019-06-15, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > On 14.06.19 10:51, Celejar wrote:
> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:50:22 +1000 Erik Christiansen
> >> wrote:
> >> > I only use mupdf for problem pdf files, but it's very nifty to have on
> >> > hand.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019, 12:11 PM Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:28:10 +0200
> Hans wrote:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2019, 16:29:27 CEST schrieb k. jantzen:
> > Did you try "Evince" or "Okular"?
>
I like evince.
> >
> > > in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either
Quoting franiortiz hotmail (2019-06-17 11:33:30)
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:11:17PM -0700, Fred wrote:
>> On 06/15/2019 08:40 AM, k. jantzen wrote:
>>>On 6/13/19 4:29 PM, k. jantzen wrote:
in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either
xpdf or documentviewer.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:11:17PM -0700, Fred wrote:
> On 06/15/2019 08:40 AM, k. jantzen wrote:
> >On 6/13/19 4:29 PM, k. jantzen wrote:
> >>
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either xpdf
> >>or documentviewer.
> >>
> >>But once in a while I get a pdf
On 2019-06-17, Sarunas Burdulis wrote:
>
>..or install Adobe Reader 9.5.5, which is still available on Adobe FTP
>
> server. Very rarely needed here, but it works.
>
I wonder about the advisability of running software that hasn't received
security updates since 2013.
On 6/15/19 3:11 PM, Fred wrote:
> On 06/15/2019 08:40 AM, k. jantzen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> thanks a lot for this interesting discussion.
>>
>> As stated before I used documentviewer and xpdf.
>>
>> As a consequence of this discussion I tried evince and mupdf.
>> They did not solve the problem.
>>
On 16/06/19, Gary Dale (g...@extremeground.com) wrote:
> On 2019-06-15 12:43 p.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > We agree it is uncommon to use both (you go further and claim it is even
> > common to use neither), and we agree it is common to use either one or
> > the other (you go further and
Quoting Steve Litt (2019-06-16 09:04:14)
[ stuff posted off list ]
Please don't move the conversation off the list.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep
On 2019-06-15 12:43 p.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Gary Dale (2019-06-15 17:46:50)
On 2019-06-15 10:56 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Gary Dale (2019-06-15 16:31:28)
On 2019-06-15 3:39 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
A reason to avoid Okular is its memory and disk size when used
On 06/15/2019 08:40 AM, k. jantzen wrote:
On 6/13/19 4:29 PM, k. jantzen wrote:
Hello,
in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either
xpdf or documentviewer.
But once in a while I get a pdf file that they cannot read and then I
have to go to Windows to open it.
What
Quoting k. jantzen (2019-06-15 17:40:24)
> On 6/13/19 4:29 PM, k. jantzen wrote:
> > in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either
> > xpdf or documentviewer.
> >
> > But once in a while I get a pdf file that they cannot read and then
> > I have to go to Windows to open it.
Quoting Gary Dale (2019-06-15 17:46:50)
> On 2019-06-15 10:56 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting Gary Dale (2019-06-15 16:31:28)
>>> On 2019-06-15 3:39 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
A reason to avoid Okular is its memory and disk size when used in
an otherwise non-KDE environment.
On 15/06/19, Curt (cu...@free.fr) wrote:
> I use mupdf from time to time, but as it doesn't refresh automagically like
> Evince when I run 'pdflatex' on an open pdf file whose tex source I've
> modified, I prefer the latter.
Depending on your editor, it should be simple to sync the PDF to changes
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 05:40:24PM +0200, k. jantzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks a lot for this interesting discussion.
>
> As stated before I used documentviewer and xpdf.
>
> As a consequence of this discussion I tried evince and mupdf.
> They did not solve the problem.
You might also try gv
On 6/13/19 4:29 PM, k. jantzen wrote:
Hello,
in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either xpdf
or documentviewer.
But once in a while I get a pdf file that they cannot read and then I
have to go to Windows to open it.
What is so spectacular about these files that
On 2019-06-15 10:56 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Gary Dale (2019-06-15 16:31:28)
On 2019-06-15 3:39 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
A reason to avoid Okular is its memory and disk size when used in an
otherwise non-KDE environment.
Far better than (e.g. virtualized) Windows with Adobe
Quoting Gary Dale (2019-06-15 16:31:28)
> On 2019-06-15 3:39 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> A reason to avoid Okular is its memory and disk size when used in an
>> otherwise non-KDE environment.
>>
>> Far better than (e.g. virtualized) Windows with Adobe Reader, though
>> :-)
>
> However few
On 2019-06-15 3:39 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[ quotes reordered by time - please consider not top-posting, Hans ]
Quoting Gary Dale (2019-06-15 05:35:58)
On 2019-06-13 12:10 p.m., Joe wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2019, 16:29:27 CEST schrieb k. jantzen:
in general I do not have a
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:39:08AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:28:10 +0200 Hans wrote:
Never had a problem with PDF forms using Okular.
A reason to avoid Okular is its memory and disk size when used in an
otherwise non-KDE environment.
I haven't had any better
On 15.06.19 07:51, Curt wrote:
> curty@einstein:~$ mupdf
> usage: mupdf [options] file.pdf [page]
> -p -password
> -r -resolution
> -A -set anti-aliasing quality in bits (0=off, 8=best)
> -C -RRGGBB (tint color in hexadecimal syntax)
> -W -
Quoting Curt (2019-06-15 09:51:22)
> On 2019-06-15, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > On 14.06.19 10:51, Celejar wrote:
> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:50:22 +1000
> >> Erik Christiansen wrote:
> >> > I only use mupdf for problem pdf files, but it's very nifty to
> >> > have on hand.
> >>
> >> I
On 2019-06-15, Curt wrote:
> On 2019-06-15, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>> On 14.06.19 10:51, Celejar wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:50:22 +1000
>>> Erik Christiansen wrote:
>>> > I only use mupdf for problem pdf files, but it's very nifty to have on
>>> > hand.
>>>
>>> I actually love mupdf,
On 2019-06-15, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 14.06.19 10:51, Celejar wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:50:22 +1000
>> Erik Christiansen wrote:
>> > I only use mupdf for problem pdf files, but it's very nifty to have on
>> > hand.
>>
>> I actually love mupdf, and I use it as my main pdf reader.
[ quotes reordered by time - please consider not top-posting, Hans ]
Quoting Gary Dale (2019-06-15 05:35:58)
> On 2019-06-13 12:10 p.m., Joe wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2019, 16:29:27 CEST schrieb k. jantzen:
in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either
xpdf
On 14.06.19 10:51, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:50:22 +1000
> Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > I only use mupdf for problem pdf files, but it's very nifty to have on
> > hand.
>
> I actually love mupdf, and I use it as my main pdf reader. It's just so
> lightweight and easy to use for
On 2019-06-13 12:10 p.m., Joe wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:28:10 +0200
Hans wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2019, 16:29:27 CEST schrieb k. jantzen:
Did you try "Evince" or "Okular"?
Best
Hans
Hello,
in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either
xpdf or documentviewer.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:50:22 +1000
Erik Christiansen wrote:
...
> I only use mupdf for problem pdf files, but it's very nifty to have on
> hand.
I actually love mupdf, and I use it as my main pdf reader. It's just so
lightweight and easy to use for basic pdf reading.
Celejar
e (a.k.a. "documentviewer"), Xpdf, Okular, Atril, Qpdfview and
> > others use Poppler:
>
>
> I started using Atril in last couple years after seeing it mentioned
> over on Debian-Accessibility. I haven't used anything else since. I
> haven't had any problems reading
ut can check which underlying PDF
> rendering library they use which are far more limited.
>
> Evince (a.k.a. "documentviewer"), Xpdf, Okular, Atril, Qpdfview and
> others use Poppler:
I started using Atril in last couple years after seeing it mentioned
over on Debian-Accessibilit
On 13.06.19 16:29, k. jantzen wrote:
>
> in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either xpdf or
> documentviewer.
Yup, documentviewer will sometimes show faint lines better, I find, but
it's easy to set the background colour in xpdf.
> But once in a while I get a pdf file
Quoting k. jantzen (2019-06-13 16:29:27)
> in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either xpdf
> or documentviewer.
>
> But once in a while I get a pdf file that they cannot read and then I
> have to go to Windows to open it.
>
> What is so spectacular about these files that
...
>> in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either xpdf
>> or documentviewer.
>>
>> But once in a while I get a pdf file that they cannot read and then I
>> have to go to Windows to open it.
>>
>> What is so spectacular about these files that they cannot be read by the
>>
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:28:10 +0200
Hans wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2019, 16:29:27 CEST schrieb k. jantzen:
> Did you try "Evince" or "Okular"?
>
> Best
>
> Hans
> > Hello,
> >
> > in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either
> > xpdf or documentviewer.
> >
> > But
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2019, 16:29:27 CEST schrieb k. jantzen:
Did you try "Evince" or "Okular"?
Best
Hans
> Hello,
>
> in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either xpdf
> or documentviewer.
>
> But once in a while I get a pdf file that they cannot read and then I
> have
Hello,
in general I do not have a problem reading a pdf file with either xpdf
or documentviewer.
But once in a while I get a pdf file that they cannot read and then I
have to go to Windows to open it.
What is so spectacular about these files that they cannot be read by the
above
38 matches
Mail list logo
