mobtek mobtekl wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:57:35 -0600
Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wierd, I'm using two of these cards on 2.4.13 without any probs whatsoever.
I've generally found them to be really reliable cards.
cheers peter vdm
Yes. I solved it be throwing the
* On 20-11-01 at 10:40 Emil Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+Here quoted text begins+
[...]
I think it's important to be very precise what chip is used; I've heard
lots of trouble with the chip '8139C' (note the trailing 'C') while I
use three cards based on '8139' (no C) for a
Bostjan Muller wrote:
* On 20-11-01 at 10:40 Emil Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+Here quoted text begins+
[...]
I think it's important to be very precise what chip is used; I've heard
lots of trouble with the chip '8139C' (note the trailing 'C') while I
use three cards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bostjan Muller) writes:
* On 20-11-01 at 10:40 Emil Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+Here quoted text begins+
[...]
I think it's important to be very precise what chip is used; I've heard
lots of trouble with the chip '8139C' (note the trailing 'C') while
On 20 Nov 2001, W. Paul Mills wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bostjan Muller) writes:
* On 20-11-01 at 10:40 Emil Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+Here quoted text begins+
[...]
I think it's important to be very precise what chip is used; I've heard
lots of trouble with
Another strange thing:
The new driver (rtl8139) says it's an RTL8139C+ while
the 2.4.14 kernel C+ driver says otherwise.
8139cp 10/100 PCI Ethernet driver v0.0.5 (Oct 19, 2001)
8139cp: pci dev 00:09.0 (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible chip
8139cp: Try the 8139too driver
IS ther a module for this driver - seems nothing available in modconf.
--
Eric Smith
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Eric Smith wrote:
IS ther a module for this driver - seems nothing available in modconf.
It should be 8138too.
/lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/8139too.o
Oki
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:16:29AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
IS ther a module for this driver - seems nothing available in modconf.
The module name changed with the 2.4.x
2.2.x rtl8139
2.4.x 8139too
Maybe you've to insert the name by hand in the /etc/modules file.
Sven
--
Lamer! :)
Lokaler
Hi, I'm using the same module but am experiencing a little problem: on
shutdown, the message eth0: too much work at interrupt x keeps
repeating itself.
Anyone got the same problem ?
Coen
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:16:29AM +0100, Eric Smith
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 02:05:22PM +0100, Coen De Roover wrote:
Hi, I'm using the same module but am experiencing a little problem: on
shutdown, the message eth0: too much work at interrupt x keeps
repeating itself.
Anyone got the same problem ?
Yes. I solved it be throwing the
I'll follow your advice :)
The strange thing is however, that before I upgraded to 2.4.X everything
worked fine ..
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 02:05:22PM +0100, Coen De Roover wrote:
Hi, I'm using the same module but am experiencing a little
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Coen De Roover wrote:
I'll follow your advice :)
The strange thing is however, that before I upgraded to 2.4.X everything
worked fine ..
I noticed the same thing.
The card is a RTL8139C and since I switched to 2.4.x
I daily get transmit time-outs and 'too much
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:57:35 -0600
Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wierd, I'm using two of these cards on 2.4.13 without any probs whatsoever.
I've generally found them to be really reliable cards.
cheers peter vdm
Yes. I solved it be throwing the cards in the garbage and
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:36:51 +1100, mobtek mobtekl writes:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:57:35 -0600
Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I solved it be throwing the cards in the garbage and installing
real NICs.
These cards were reporting overruns at a rate 10x that of properly
received
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dries Kimpe) writes:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Coen De Roover wrote:
I'll follow your advice :)
The strange thing is however, that before I upgraded to 2.4.X everything
worked fine ..
I noticed the same thing.
The card is a RTL8139C and since I switched to 2.4.x
I
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Dries Kimpe wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Coen De Roover wrote:
I'll follow your advice :)
The strange thing is however, that before I upgraded to 2.4.X everything
worked fine ..
I noticed the same thing.
The card is a RTL8139C and since I switched to 2.4.x
I
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Dries Kimpe wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Coen De Roover wrote:
I'll follow your advice :)
The strange thing is however, that before I upgraded to 2.4.X everything
worked fine ..
I noticed the same thing.
The card is a RTL8139C and since I switched to 2.4.x
I
18 matches
Mail list logo
