Re: Recommendation for build environment(s)

2006-11-12 Thread hendrik
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:53:52PM +0200, Maxim Vexler wrote: > On 11/9/06, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Maxim Vexler wrote: > >> Hello list, > >> > >> A "general question email". > >> > >> I'd like to get a recommendations on build environments

Re: Recommendation for build environment(s)

2006-11-11 Thread ChadDavis
I don't know if you can use Ant. I usually work with Java but the books I've read on Ant say that there are c++ packages built for it. I do know that it is WAY faster than make. The main reason being that all of the recursive and secondary processing is done with in the JVM ( ant being java base

Re: Recommendation for build environment(s)

2006-11-11 Thread Miles Bader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M.A. Cater) writes: > Possibly try to limit your make tools to GNU make or the > GNUautoconf/automake [see below] ... > All of the above are good but not as well known as make/automake. Yeah, I'll second that. The autotools suite is in many ways pretty kludgey implement

Re: Recommendation for build environment(s)

2006-11-11 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:53:52PM +0200, Maxim Vexler wrote: > > > > Hello Kevin, > Following your suggestion I'll focus my question further. > > >What do you want to build with this? web apps, embedded software, > >console tools for system administraion or ? A simple set of programs for > >a co

Re: Recommendation for build environment(s)

2006-11-11 Thread Maxim Vexler
On 11/8/06, Nicolas Pillot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking for open source tools as a general guide line, but > commercial tools could be considered too. I'd say eclipse is a good pick. It served us well on all the (medium-size) projects over the years, and we had the same configuration

Re: Recommendation for build environment(s)

2006-11-11 Thread Maxim Vexler
On 11/9/06, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Maxim Vexler wrote: > Hello list, > > A "general question email". > > I'd like to get a recommendations on build environments setups, > available today in the Linux world. Build environments should support

Re: Recommendation for build environment(s)

2006-11-08 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Maxim Vexler wrote: > Hello list, > > A "general question email". > > I'd like to get a recommendations on build environments setups, > available today in the Linux world. Build environments should support > C/C++ code. > > I'm looking for a tool / frame

Recommendation for build environment(s)

2006-11-08 Thread Maxim Vexler
Hello list, A "general question email". I'd like to get a recommendations on build environments setups, available today in the Linux world. Build environments should support C/C++ code. I'm looking for a tool / framework that would be : 1. User friendly (web interface) 2. Flexible (can be exte