If I gather correctly Smail was once the recommended or the standard mail
processing software with Debian. But as of version 2.1 Smail was dropped
from Debian due to some serious bugs or something like that.
I decided to stay with Smail for a little longer as I knew Smail pretty
well, and I
JN If I gather correctly Smail was once the recommended or the standard mail
JN processing software with Debian. But as of version 2.1 Smail was dropped
JN from Debian due to some serious bugs or something like that.
JN I decided to stay with Smail for a little longer as I knew Smail pretty
JN
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
to Smartlist.
Try listar. Fast, flexible and with a _very_ helpful mailing list.
cheers,
rw
--
-- C'mon, which [luser] is it, standard or metric? I'd say
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Robert Waldner wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
to Smartlist.
Try listar. Fast, flexible and with a _very_ helpful mailing list.
Listar also has a lovely
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:30:18 BST, Gavin Hamill writes:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Robert Waldner wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
to Smartlist.
Try listar. Fast, flexible and with a
Gavin Hamill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Listar also has a lovely web-configuration frontend so lusers who can't
figure out how to use a -request admin address can adjust their settings
Is it better than mailman's web frontend? Considering that mailman
lusers still can't seem to unsubscribe on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
Gavin Hamill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Listar also has a lovely web-configuration frontend so lusers who can't
figure out how to use a -request admin address can adjust their settings
Is it better than
7 matches
Mail list logo