thveillon.debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> So "please don't break my system to often/badly" is what I meant, and of
> course keep making Debian the best os ever ;-)
Welcome aboard. FYI, when Etch went stable there were posts in here
along the lines of, "I just did a dist-upgrade, and it ran cl
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:22:53PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:28:40AM -0500, Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:
>
> > But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and can
> > live with bugs, then use testing. If you don't like bugs, then run
> > stable.
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:28:40AM -0500, Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:
> But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and can
> live with bugs, then use testing. If you don't like bugs, then run
> stable.
One of my hobbies is translating English into English.
The above tr
>
> I don't know how you are running Sidux AND Debian Sid.
Apologies, wan't too clear. The distro called sidux; its core system is Debian
sid (as far as i understand)
> On Sid, I run apt-get upgrade about twice a week, read the output of
> apt-listbugs and then do the same for dist-upgrade.
W
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso a écrit :
On 05/06/2008, thveillon.debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Testing
[snip]
has always been at least as reliable as Ubuntu.
That's not saying much. ;-)
But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and can
live with bugs, then
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:50 +0100, Jamie Griffin wrote:
> I'm sure there is some documentation i read on this, but as the testing
> release has been brought up,
> thought i'd take advantage of the knowledge from you guys who have been using
> it a lot.
>
> On sidux running Debian sid,
I don'
I'm sure there is some documentation i read on this, but as the testing release
has been brought up,
thought i'd take advantage of the knowledge from you guys who have been using
it a lot.
On sidux running Debian sid, it was recommended to do a 'apt-get dist-upgrade'
regularly (ie, every few
Am 2008-06-04 10:02:13, schrieb Patrick Wiseman:
> So? I've been using testing for years, and have found it to be
> remarkably stable - it's remarkable precisely because it IS 'testing'.
How can this be with the perl 5.10 transition?
The half of my system was down even by upgrading every day...
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:21 +0100, Jamie Griffin wrote:
> > Testing is the right choice for me, and if it no longer is I would move
> > to another distro immediately. Etch doesn't even install on many recent
> > machines.
>
> I too am just a regular user. I have been using sidux and found it t
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:28 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 05/06/2008, thveillon.debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Testing
> [snip]
> > has always been at least as reliable as Ubuntu.
>
>
> That's not saying much. ;-)
>
> But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you li
On 05/06/2008, thveillon.debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Testing
[snip]
> has always been at least as reliable as Ubuntu.
That's not saying much. ;-)
But seriously, people, testing is not stable. If you like bugs and can
live with bugs, then use testing. If you don't like bugs, then run
> Testing is the right choice for me, and if it no longer is I would move
> to another distro immediately. Etch doesn't even install on many recent
> machines.
I too am just a regular user. I have been using sidux and found it to be
sound os and have just put Debian testing on my laptop a few
Damon L. Chesser a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:19 +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
Damon L. Chesser a écrit :
SNIP
I'm just an average Testing user, have been for a while, and around me
almost every Debian users I know are using Testing, mostly because it's
the Debian'
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:19 +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
> Damon L. Chesser a écrit :
SNIP
> >
> I'm just an average Testing user, have been for a while, and around me
> almost every Debian users I know are using Testing, mostly because it's
> the Debian's flavour which can compare with othe
Damon L. Chesser a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 01:11 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
- Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dat
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 01:11 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
> (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 18:10, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> IMHO you should at least quote him with the proper context.
> (E.g.: his clarifications in some messages that followed).
IMHO his clarifications just confirm that *IMHO* he takes the decision
to remove packa
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:19:33PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I wrote:
> > And in fact, for (using a number I just pulled out of thin air) 90% of the
> > time I've been using Debian, going back to Slink, Stable has been so
> > obsolete as to be hard to use for anything but some servers.
>
> H
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:48:57AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:02:13AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
> > So? I've been using testing for years, and have found it to be
> > remarkably stable - it's remarkable precisely because it IS 'testing'.
> > Sometimes (rarely) thi
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 06:05:49PM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This may be more interesting [1]:
>
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> [...]
> > No it's not. The principal goal of testing is to evaluate what
> > would be our next stable if we tri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This may be more interesting [1]:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
[...]
> No it's not. The principal goal of testing is to evaluate what
> would be our next stable if we tried to release *RIGHT NOW*.
> Packages with RC bugs cannot be part of a release, so must
Carl Fink wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:02:13AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
>> So? I've been using testing for years, and have found it to be
>> remarkably stable - it's remarkable precisely because it IS 'testing'.
>> Sometimes (rarely) things break, but that's something I prefer to
>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:02:13AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> So? I've been using testing for years, and have found it to be
> remarkably stable - it's remarkable precisely because it IS 'testing'.
> Sometimes (rarely) things break, but that's something I prefer to
> live with so that I can
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Chris Bannister
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
> (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tu
- Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:14:03 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#484129: release.d
25 matches
Mail list logo
