On Mon, 25 May 2009 08:37:33 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:25:29AM -0700, Frank Miles wrote:
> > I recently added a second networking card to a hardware-test PC. This
> > elderly machine
> > had been working reasonably well. The second networking card is for eth1,
Thanks, Adrian. I was sure that it wasn't just the firewall at this
point - that it was necessary to kill eth1 to get eth0 fully functional.
I was wrong.
This is now just a firewall problem. And this is a "handcrafted" beast,
with lotsa rules. I wouldn't dream (well, not yet anyway) of asking
2009/5/28 Frank Miles :
> Regrettably, the problem persists - though possibly with a different
> threshold of sorts, as pinging now seems to work. However-
> apt-get update
> still hangs. I have to kill BOTH the firewall and eth1 in order to
> make this work (not seeming to wait indefinite
Following up, particularly on Adrian Levi's suggestion to eliminate
the gateway spec in /etc/network/interfaces:
Thanks, Adrian! Your idea makes sense. Trying it: it changes the
routing table exactly as you described, causing my routing table to
match yours (excepting, of course, the specific I
2009/5/27 Frank Miles :
> Sure, can provide more info...
>
> /etc/network/interfaces :
>
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> # The primary network interface
> auto eth0
> #iface eth0 inet dhcp
> iface eth0 inet static
> address xxx.yyy.zzz.32
> network xxx.yyy.zzz.0
>
On Tue, 26 May 2009 18:20:07 +0200, Frank Miles wrote:
> Sure, can provide more info...
>
> /etc/network/interfaces :
>
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> # The primary network interface
> auto eth0
> #iface eth0 inet dhcp
> iface eth0 inet static
> address xxx.yyy.zzz
Sure, can provide more info...
/etc/network/interfaces :
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
# The primary network interface
auto eth0
#iface eth0 inet dhcp
iface eth0 inet static
address xxx.yyy.zzz.32
network xxx.yyy.zzz.0
netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcas
Do you have network-manager installed? It's not very good with setups
with mixed static/dynamic ips. If you've got network-manager, remove
it and set things up manually.
Regards,
Daniel
--
And that's my crabbing done for the day. Got it out of the way early,
now I have the rest of the after
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:25:29AM -0700, Frank Miles wrote:
I recently added a second networking card to a hardware-test PC. This elderly
machine had been working reasonably well. The second networking card is for
eth1, etc., and /sbin/ifconfig shows things as properly connected, with eth0
b
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri,22.May.09, 09:25:29, Frank Miles wrote:
[snip troubles with two network cards]
Please provide your /etc/network/interfaces
And also add the output of 'route'. It seems to me that somehow all
traffic is routed via eth1, instead of only 192.x.x.x.
Sjoerd
signatu
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:25:29AM -0700, Frank Miles wrote:
> I recently added a second networking card to a hardware-test PC. This
> elderly machine
> had been working reasonably well. The second networking card is for eth1,
> etc., and
> /sbin/ifconfig shows things as properly connected, wit
On Fri,22.May.09, 09:25:29, Frank Miles wrote:
[snip troubles with two network cards]
Please provide your /etc/network/interfaces
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I recently added a second networking card to a hardware-test PC. This elderly
machine
had been working reasonably well. The second networking card is for eth1,
etc., and
/sbin/ifconfig shows things as properly connected, with eth0 being the outside
interface
and eth1 being an internal 192.168
On Sat, Jul 24, 1999 at 10:56:36PM -0400, Donna Lopolito wrote:
> I'm running slink. My eth0 is an ne2000 and works fine. I want to add a
> second ne2000. I've tried editing the lilo.conf file with: append="ether
> 12,0x300,eth1", then runing lilo and then rebooting but no luck. What is
> the proce
I'm running slink. My eth0 is an ne2000 and works fine. I want to add a
second ne2000. I've tried editing the lilo.conf file with: append="ether
12,0x300,eth1", then runing lilo and then rebooting but no luck. What is
the process?
thanks,
-tom-
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
> I was wondering where I should set up the configuration for my second
> ethernet card. I have two ethernet cards, both PCI and Tulip chipset,
> which are currently detected just fine during bootup.
>
> I set up the ethernet
I was wondering where I should set up the configuration for my second
ethernet card. I have two ethernet cards, both PCI and Tulip chipset,
which are currently detected just fine during bootup.
I set up the ethernet networking like normal during the Debian
installation, and it works fine. What
>> I am planing on purchasing a 256k DSL to my Linux server.
>> I currently have one Ehternet card that is connected to
>> my home PC with a crossover cable. I will need to purchase
>> an additional Ethernet card for my Server to connect to the
>> DSL connection.
>>
>> Should I purchase the cable
I am planing on purchasing a 256k DSL to my Linux server.
I currently have one Ehternet card that is connected to
my home PC with a crossover cable. I will need to purchase
an additional Ethernet card for my Server to connect to the
DSL connection.
Should I purchase the cable and then completely
On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
>
> I haved two 3c509.
> 1)To run with both you must compile driver into kernel (not
> as module).
though mine is a different model (3C590), I had no problem with
modules. I have 3 (three) 3C590, with ip-masq, compiled as module,
which are detected w/
> I have recompiled the kernel to support IP forwarding. One of two 3C509
> Cards that I have on my machine works. What is required to get my second
> Ethernet Card working?
> I have tried to add the append="ether=11,0x320.eth1" statement to
> lilo.conf but it doesn&
ired to get my second
> Ethernet Card working?
> I have tried to add the append="ether=11,0x320.eth1" statement to
> lilo.conf but it doesn't make it work. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Drazen
>
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word &q
D]) wrote:
>
> > I have recompiled the kernel to support IP forwarding. One of two 3C509
> > Cards that I have on my machine works. What is required to get my second
> > Ethernet Card working?
> > I have tried to add the append="ether=11,0x320.eth1" statement
esdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/3c509.c
// Heikki
Drazen Lalovic wrote:
>
> THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP. DO YOU KNOW THE PATCH NAME?
>
> THANKS,
> DRAZEN
> --
>From: Philippe Troin
>To: Lalovic, Drazen
>Subject: Re: Second Ethernet Card
>Date: Thursday, June 26,
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP. DO YOU KNOW THE PATCH NAME?
THANKS,
DRAZEN
--
From: Philippe Troin
To: Lalovic, Drazen
Subject: Re: Second Ethernet Card
Date: Thursday, June 26, 1997 3:45PM
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:12:00 EDT "Lalovic, Drazen"
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have r
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP. DO YOU KNOW THE PATCH NAME?
THANKS,
DRAZEN
--
From: Philippe Troin
To: Lalovic, Drazen
Subject: Re: Second Ethernet Card
Date: Thursday, June 26, 1997 3:45PM
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:12:00 EDT "Lalovic, Drazen"
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have r
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, Lalovic, Drazen wrote:
: I have recompiled the kernel to support IP forwarding. One of two 3C509
: Cards that I have on my machine works. What is required to get my second
: Ethernet Card working?
: I have tried to add the append="ether=11,0x320.eth1" st
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:12:00 EDT "Lalovic, Drazen"
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have recompiled the kernel to support IP forwarding. One of two 3C509
> Cards that I have on my machine works. What is required to get my second
> Ethernet Card working?
> I have tried to
I have recompiled the kernel to support IP forwarding. One of two 3C509
Cards that I have on my machine works. What is required to get my second
Ethernet Card working?
I have tried to add the append="ether=11,0x320.eth1" statement to
lilo.conf but it doesn't make it work. Any
30 matches
Mail list logo
