On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Salman Ahmed wrote:
You are right. I am using WDM. BTW, where is this port 1024 specified
for WDM ? Just curious.
using a bind(2) call in the program source code.
[]s,
Mario O.de MenezesMany are the plans in a man's heart, but
IPEN-CNEN/SP
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 05:12:15PM -0500, Stephen R. Gore wrote:
BTW, where is this port 1024 specified for WDM ? Just
curious.
I don't even know if it IS specified. I got the info like
this:
Daemons that run stand-alone do not need a file like
/etc/inetd.conf to specify on which port
Salman Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then there was the issue with ndbm.h not getting found. It was located in
/usr/include/db1 but I had to explicitly specify that dir with
--site-includes, which I thought was a bit strange.
That is because the glibc maintainers have decide to move to db2
First off, my apologies if this email is considered off-topic. The
reason I am posting to this list about this subject is because I
have received excellent help and support in the past from other
debian users.
Just yesterday I noticed in one of my log files a number of connection
attempts to my
Jan == Jan Vroonhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan What struggle? XEmacs should compile on a typical Debian system,
Jan just using
What I meant by that was that I didn't have all the dev libraries installed
so, after installing a couple and trying make it would later bomb on some
dev
Stephen == Stephen R Gore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen On my system wdm runs on port 1024. I don't know if you are
Stephen running wdm, but I would suspect that xdm and gdm use the same
Stephen port. YMMV.
You are right. I am using WDM. BTW, where is this port 1024 specified
Salman Ahmed wrote:
Stephen == Stephen R Gore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen On my system wdm runs on port 1024. I don't know if you are
Stephen running wdm, but I would suspect that xdm and gdm use the same
Stephen port. YMMV.
You are right. I am using WDM. BTW, where is
7 matches
Mail list logo
