Bonjour,
Il y a un article du wiki Debian sur Exim:
https://wiki.debian.org/Exim
Dans un scénario qui a l'air proche du tien, on y parle de relai
smarthost, de macro TLS et de réécriture d'adresse e-mail de l'émetteur.
(Je ne sais pas si ça joue mais je suis chez Free aussi et il me semble
que
Le 02/01/2023 à 14:01, roger.tar...@free.fr a écrit :
Bonjour
Cette syntaxe à double ':' avant le n° de port (ex :
|smtp.example.com::587|) se retrouve à de nombreux endroits :
ex : https://www.pontikis.net/blog/gmail-smarthost-exim4-debian
https://alexander.holbreich.org/exim-mail-google/
On 02/01/2023 14:01, roger.tar...@free.fr wrote:
Bonjour
Cette syntaxe à double ':' avant le n° de port (ex :
|smtp.example.com::587|) se retrouve à de nombreux endroits :
ex : https://www.pontikis.net/blog/gmail-smarthost-exim4-debian
https://alexander.holbreich.org/exim-mail-google/
Quel
-mail-google/ |
https://alexander.holbreich.org/exim-mail-google/ ]
Quel outil utiles-tu pour envoyer des e-mails depuis un programme avec un
service smtp tiers ?
De: "NoSpam"
À: "Liste Debian"
Envoyé: Lundi 2 Janvier 2023 13:33:05
Objet: Re: configurer sendmail/exim
Bonjour
Le 02/01/2023 à 02:49, roger.tar...@free.fr a écrit :
Bonjour la liste, et bonne année 2023,
Sur un serveur debian11, j'ai besoin d'activer un service de messagerie.
J'ai déjà réussi par le passé et un programme utilisait fiablement une
commande sendmail (comme on peut le faire en CLI
ai besoin d'activer un service de messagerie.
> J'ai déjà réussi par le passé et un programme utilisait fiablement une
> commande sendmail (comme on peut le faire en CLI : echo "Subject: hello" |
> sendmail toto@ freefr ).
>
> Déjà, je souhaite pouvoir exploiter un serveur de mes
Bonjour et bonne année
On 02/01/2023 02:49, roger.tar...@free.fr wrote:
Bonjour la liste, et bonne année 2023,
Sur un serveur debian11, j'ai besoin d'activer un service de messagerie.
SMTP et EXIM sont complexes. Je conseille la lecture (à tête reposée)
d'un livre entier sur la question,
Bonjour la liste, et bonne année 2023,
Sur un serveur debian11, j'ai besoin d'activer un service de messagerie.
J'ai déjà réussi par le passé et un programme utilisait fiablement une commande
sendmail (comme on peut le faire en CLI : echo "Subject: hello" | sendmail [
mailto:t...@e
There is an little helper program; try:
> testsaslauthd -u -p
>
> you might have to specify the location (-f path) of the unix socket if it
> is located
> somewhere uncommon.
>
> If your authentication works then the communication between sendmail and
> saslauthd
> is not
t; Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP
> > server
> > > for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
> > > have deployed and configured Sendmail on probably hundreds of servers
> > over
> > > the years, but mo
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:37 AM Henning Follmann
wrote:
>
> First, please do not top post.
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> > Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP
> server
> > for a university
First, please do not top post.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP server
> for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
> have deployed and configured
Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP server
for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
have deployed and configured Sendmail on probably hundreds of servers over
the years, but most of them are on internal networks and relay mail
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:55:06AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Years ago, I set up an SMTP server on Debian 7.5, running Sendmail
> configured for SASL authentication using an LDAP directory. I am now
> trying to set up a new one on Debian 11.5 in pretty much the same
Hello,
Years ago, I set up an SMTP server on Debian 7.5, running Sendmail
configured for SASL authentication using an LDAP directory. I am now
trying to set up a new one on Debian 11.5 in pretty much the same
configuration, but SMTP auth does not work. I have verified that nslcd and
saslauthd
e finasserai la configuration plus tard.
>
> Une question résiduelle que je viens de me poser. Lorsqu'un utilisateur
> envoie un mail, il utilise le SMTP (sur le MX1) sur le port 587.
> sendmail demande une authentification. Si pas d'authentification, le
> mail est refusé. Mais sur le
poser. Lorsqu'un utilisateur
envoie un mail, il utilise le SMTP (sur le MX1) sur le port 587.
sendmail demande une authentification. Si pas d'authentification, le
mail est refusé. Mais sur le port 25, quel est le mécanisme qui fait
qu'un utilisateur ne peut pas envoyer directement un mail (que ce soit
/bin/newaliases
>> non_smtpd_milters = unix:/var/clamav/clamav-milter.sock
>> postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks
>> proxy_interfaces = 192.168.15.14
>> queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
>> readme_directory = /usr/share/examples/postfix
>> relay_domains = $
_interfaces = 192.168.15.14
> queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
> readme_directory = /usr/share/examples/postfix
> relay_domains = $mydestination, systella.fr
> relay_recipient_maps =
> sample_directory = /usr/share/examples/postfix
> sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail
> s
Bonjour à tous,
Je tente la configuration d'un serveur de mail postfix comme backup
d'un sendmail des familles et le moins qu'on puisse dire, c'est que si
la configuration de sendmail est complexe, on voit assez rapidement ce
qui cloche contrairement à postfix ;-)
Je
Bonjour à tous,
Après bricolage dans le sendmail.cf, j'ai trouvé que sendmail allait
chercher un fichier de conf Sendmail.conf partout sauf dans
/etc/mail/sasl. Normalement, ce fichier s'appelle d'ailleurs
Sendmail.conf.2 vu qu'il s'agit de saslv2.
Un lien de /etc/mail
Merci. Mais ça, je connais, je suis un barbu capable d'envoyer des
mails par telnet. Mon problème est surtout que sendmail semble
totalement ignorer sasl. J'en suis à comparer deux sendmail.cf, celui
d'un site fonctionnel et celui du site que je suis en train de monter.
Et même là, je ne vois rien d'ab
pataper: j'y connais vraiment rien
mais peut-être ici auras-tu un début de piste (utilisation de telnet et
du port 587 pour tester sasl/smtp)
https://networking.ringofsaturn.com/Protocols/howtotestsendmailauthentication.php
Bonsoir à tous,
Je suis en train de monter pour une association un serveur de mail et
je butte sur un problème que je n'arrive par à résoudre.
J'utilise un sendmail des familles (parce que ça fait trente ans que
j'utilise sendmail sur tous mes systèmes allant de VMS à
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 09:34:25 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:57:10 -0600 David Wright wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the problem is similar to the one I had with this list
> > (hence the change I made above). What happened was that my posts'
> > Envelope-from (set to the same as my From
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 08:52:30 (+), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-26 03:57, David Wright wrote:
>
> > What sort of rejections and/or bounces have you had?
>
> It showed up that mails to getmail list that uses Exim were refused as
> unsubscribed whereas before was OK.
I take it that was
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:57:10 -0600
David Wright wrote:
> Perhaps the problem is similar to the one I had with this list
> (hence the change I made above). What happened was that my posts'
> Envelope-from (set to the same as my From address above) was being
> changed by my mail hosting service
On 2020-11-26 03:57, David Wright wrote:
What sort of rejections and/or bounces have you had?
It showed up that mails to getmail list that uses Exim were refused as
unsubscribed whereas before was OK.
I "think" I then subscribed with noctiluc...@sky.com which worked for a
bit but then from
On Wed 25 Nov 2020 at 00:08:27 (+), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> > > collection, sendmail and thunderbird
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:11:29 +
Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:13:03 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook
> > > while away from home, as I have both
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:13:03 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook
> > while away from home, as I have both "smart"phone and tablet, but
> > they are extremely limited toys and they
>> > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> >>> > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
> >>> > like this is a common practice.
> >>> >
> >>> > What are the advantages of this
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
Joe wrote:
...
> proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook while
> away from home, as I have both "smart"phone and tablet, but they are
> extremely limited toys and they are owned by Google. If I need a mobile
> computer, then I want a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:30:41AM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 23:34:56 -0600 David Wright
> wrote:
>
> >>> On Mon 23 Nov 2020 at 14:27:36 (+1100), Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> >>> > So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>
> Interesting. I'll try it next time I want
t;> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> >> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
> >> like this is a common practice.
> >>
> >> What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting
> >> tbir
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:30:49 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>
> I like the idea of a local imap server. I have a RPi that will do the
> job, sitting ready and waiting. How easy is it to get phone/tablet to
> connect while I'm away? though. A good URI would be an excellent
> answer.
>
Less
On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
So does htis get a new subject in the list?
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:50:34 -0600 John Hasler
wrote:
>> I use Fetchmail to fetch my mail every five minutes from Newsguy.
>> This means that my mail is never on anyone else's server for more
>> than a few minutes. Fetchmail hands it off to Exim which passes it
>> through Mailagent and
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:19:16 +0200 Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
>>> On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>>> > So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>>> >
>>> > Good afternon All
>>> >
>>> > I was interested to
erested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
>>> > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
>>> > like this is a common practice.
>>> >
>>> > What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting
>>> &g
I use Fetchmail to fetch my mail every five minutes from Newsguy. This
means that my mail is never on anyone else's server for more than a few
minutes. Fetchmail hands it off to Exim which passes it through
Mailagent and Spamassassin and then delivers it to my inbox. Outgoing
mail is delivered
On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>
> Good afternon All
>
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
> this is a commo
On 2020-11-23 at 05:43, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:21:25 +1100 Keith Bainbridge
> wrote:
>> PS Am I wrong to avoid 'everyting in 1 file' where possible (mail
>> dir rather than mbox in this case)? OK this is probably a whole
>> separate topic.
>
> As I've posted elsewhere, I have
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:21:25 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> Good afternon All
>
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
> this is a common practice.
>
> What are the a
On Mon 23 Nov 2020 at 14:27:36 (+1100), Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> So does htis get a new subject in the list?
It would appear so. I guess you could also have removed the Re:
from the subject line.
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection,
So does htis get a new subject in the list?
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this is a common practice.
What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this is a common practice.
What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
it all? - or any other client for that matter
Dan,
> You could do the wrapper, or you could install nullmailer, which
> is an extremely simple MTA that always hands off mail to a
> relayhost (i.e. somebody else's problem).
I ended up with a following wrapper:
$ cat /usr/sbin/sendmail
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# As header fields are a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 3/6/19 5:40 am, Martin T wrote:
> What could be the most elegant workaround in this situation? Create
> a /usr/sbin/sendmail wrapper script which processes the
> "/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t" command called by apt_listcha
with "email_address" configuration option. Now
> when I upgrade a package which has NEWS/changelog present, then I get
> the "apt-listchanges: The mail frontend needs an installed 'sendmail',
> using pager" error message. This is because I don't have
> /u
kage which has NEWS/changelog present, then I get
the "apt-listchanges: The mail frontend needs an installed 'sendmail',
using pager" error message. This is because I don't have
/usr/sbin/sendmail binary installed. I prefer to use mail/mailx and an
external MTA.
What could be the most elegan
Ce n'est pas n'importe quoi comme réponses...
Trois "relay=hotmail-com.olc.protection.outlook.com., dsn=4.0.0,
stat=Deferred" sont toujours suivis par un message DSN complet
"relay=hotmail-com.olc.protection.outlook.com. [104.47.34.33],
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 403 4.7.0 TLS handshake
Bon, bon, bon... C'est plus grave que ça. Le patch semble fonctionner.
En revanche, les codes d'erreur sont tronqués aléatoirement. Sur le même
message envoyé à un MX en échec, j'ai aléatoirement dans mes logs :
Nov 5 18:00:13 rayleigh sm-mta[31991]: wA5GxrK0031751: to=<...>,
delay=00:00:19,
Bonjour à tous,
J'utilise depuis des années un patch à sendmail pour envoyer des
mails à des serveurs avec une configuration TLS foireuse.
Ce patch est le suivant :
diff -ruN sendmail-8.15.2-/cf/feature/tls_failures.m4
sendmail-8.15.2/cf/feature
--- sendmail-8.15.2-/cf
On 29.08.18 11:57, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> However both sendmail and update-inetd are orphaned at the moment (no
> regular maintainers, although Andreas Beckmann has done a lot of work
> via the QA team)
After favouring sendmail for a decade and a half, I thought I was slow
to switch t
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:42:01AM -0400, Luis Finotti wrote:
Thanks for the pointer! sendmail-base.prerm had the line:
update-inetd --group MAIL --disable smtp,smtps,submission;
and I was getting the error
update-inetd: error: --group is only relevant with --add
This would appear
> Building dependency tree
>> > Reading state information... Done
>> > Package 'sendemail' is not installed, so not removed
>> > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
>> > 1 not fully installed or removed.
>> > After this operation
Thanks once more for the support! The problem is now solved.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:20 AM David Wright
wrote:
> On Tue 28 Aug 2018 at 09:48:06 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
>
> > # dpkg -P sendmail-base
> > (Reading database ... 1562548 files and directories c
On Tue 28 Aug 2018 at 09:48:06 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> # dpkg -P sendmail-base
> (Reading database ... 1562548 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing sendmail-base (8.15.2-11) ...
> update-inetd: error: --group is only relevant with --add
> dpkg: error pro
g state information... Done
> > Package 'sendemail' is not installed, so not removed
> > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> > 1 not fully installed or removed.
> > After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> > S
0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> 1 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Setting up sendmail-base (8.15.2-11) ...
sendmail-base is what you should be trying to remove.
And you should be using dpkg directly, not messing around wi
Firstly, thanks for the reply!
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:04 AM David Wright
wrote:
> On Mon 27 Aug 2018 at 12:38:42 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
> > aptosid -- http://
On Mon 27 Aug 2018 at 12:38:42 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
> aptosid -- http://www.aptosid.com -- actually).
Perhaps their forums might help.
> I tried to install and it failed: https
Hi everyone,
I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
aptosid -- http://www.aptosid.com -- actually).
I tried to install and it failed: https://pastebin.com/Qu2jRqsn
'apt -f install' did not fix it, nor did 'dpkg --configure -a'.
Since it was not essential (and did
Bonjour à tous,
Pour information, le sendmail de testing est actuellement moisi. Il
transforme les erreurs 4xx en 5xx et c'est un comportement connu d'une
des versions de développement. J'ai remonté le bug 807258. En attendant,
il est urgent d'attendre avec un 8.14-8 des familles à
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 23:44 +, jon wrote:
>
> root@mail:/usr/share/doc# ldd /usr/sbin/sendmail |grep 'libwrap'
> libwrap.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0xb7525000)
> root@mail:/usr/share/doc# cat /etc/debian_version
> 8.2
>
> I want to use se
root@mail:/usr/share/doc# ldd /usr/sbin/sendmail |grep 'libwrap'
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0xb7525000)
root@mail:/usr/share/doc# cat /etc/debian_version
8.2
I want to use sendmail with tcp wrappers but it does not seem to play,
it looks like it was compi
I finally managed to get sendmail working using systemd.
Here is my /etc/systemd/system/sendmail.service:
[Unit]
Description=Sendmail Mail Transport Agent
Requires=clamav-daemon.service spamassassin.service
After=syslog.target network.target clamav-daemon.service
spamassassin.service
Conflicts
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:07:37PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this has anything to do with that:
# systemctl enable sendmail
Synchronizing state for sendmail.service with sysvinit
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:25PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd. I see that the /etc/init.d/sendmail
script now runs /bin/systemctl
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd. I see that the
/etc/init.d/sendmail script now runs /bin/systemctl start
sendmail.service. But sendmail isn't started. Even running
'/bin
Hi,
Michael Grant mgr...@grant.org writes:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
A nessesary correction - /etc/init.d/sendmail *tries* to run
'/bin/systemctl start sendmail.service'.
But, since no sendmail* package provide systemd's service file -
nothing happens
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:25PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd. I
Michael Grant wrote:
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd.
...
Some comments that I think are relevant...
Since it took a while for someone to respond to your question it tells
me
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
...
Could you try restarting sendmail (systemctl restart sendmail) and show
the output of `systemctl status sendmail'? It also shows the most recent
log entries, but the output of journalctl --unit sendmail --since
/sendmail
Thanks, this is progress, I can now start sendmail by hand by running
'/etc/init.d/sendmail start', but it's not starting automatically at boot
time.
An expected result, sadly (see below).
I don't know if this has anything to do with that:
# systemctl enable sendmail
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Michael Grant wrote:
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd.
...
Some comments that I think are relevant
Hi,
Michael Grant mgr...@grant.org writes:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
Could you try restarting sendmail (systemctl restart sendmail) and show
the output of `systemctl status sendmail'? It also shows the most recent
log entries, but the output
Today I upgraded a test machine from wheezy to testing.
It seemed to install systemd, I'm not sure if it's using it or not.
One thing I noticed though was that sendmail no longer starts at boot. Even
if I run:
/etc/init.d/sendmail start
or if I cd to /etc/mail and run:
make restart
or if I
Hello,
We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit. We're
using the file /etc/mail/access for access control and rate limiting, and
this is enabled via the following lines in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf:
Kaccess hash -TTMPF /etc/mail/access
# FEATURE(`access_db', `hash -TTMPF
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:38 PM, David Parker dpar...@utica.edu wrote:
Hello,
We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit.
We're using the file /etc/mail/access for access control and rate limiting,
and this is enabled via the following lines in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
David Parker dpar...@utica.edu wrote:
We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit.
Kaccess hash -TTMPF /etc/mail/access
# FEATURE(`access_db', `hash -TTMPF /etc/mail/access', `skip')dnl
For some reason, I just can't get it to not pause when greeting external
(non
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:27:42 -0500
David Parker dpar...@utica.edu wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
The system is not using tcpwrappers, and it's also not a DNS issue.
The client PC does have a reverse DNS entry. A tcpdump packet
capture on the server shows the initial connection from the
:
David Parker dpar...@utica.edu wrote:
We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit.
Kaccess hash -TTMPF /etc/mail/access
# FEATURE(`access_db', `hash -TTMPF /etc/mail/access', `skip')dnl
For some reason, I just can't get it to not pause when greeting external
(non
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:12:11 +
Joe j...@jretrading.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:27:42 -0500
David Parker dpar...@utica.edu wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
The system is not using tcpwrappers, and it's also not a DNS issue.
The client PC does have a reverse DNS entry. A
RELAY
GreetPause:10 0
ClientRate:10 0
ClientConn:10 0
Dave,
I'm struggling with a reference beyond my own work. Please try
putting a second and maybe a third octet on your GreetPause: 10 line.
Also, please verify you are issuing a kill -HUP on sendmail. We never got
sendmail greetpause to work
Connect:10 RELAY
GreetPause:10 0
ClientRate:10 0
ClientConn:10 0
Dave,
I'm struggling with a reference beyond my own work. Please try
putting a second and maybe a third octet on your GreetPause: 10 line. Also,
please verify you are issuing a kill -HUP on sendmail. We never got
Just for the sake of completeness, this wasn't actually an issue with the
GreetPause option or anything else in the access file. The problem was
that sendmail was attempting an IDENT query to the client, with a 5-second
timeout. The access file wasn't even checked until after the timeout
expired
Yes! That seems to be the culprit. I ran an strace on the sendmail
process and that's exactly what happens:
[ ... ]
4007 15:09:08.386921 connect(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(113),
sin_addr=inet_addr(10.3.1.40)}, 16 unfinished ...
3792 15:09:13.386272 ... select resumed ) = 0 (Timeout
Is there a way to specify smart host and credentials with Sendmail
command? If yes, could you point me to example.
Thanks in advance
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:34:45AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
Is there a way to specify smart host and credentials with Sendmail
command? If yes, could you point me to example.
May I recommend msmtp? It's perfect for relaying e-mail to always-connected,
real SMTPs. I'm using it on my
howto abaixo para configurar o meu sendmail com relay do
gmail:
http://linuxconfig.org/configuring-gmail-as-sendmail-email-relay
Funcionou perfeitamente no gmail, no entanto quando tento executar o
mesmo procedimento para o meu domínio no meu provedor ele da diversas
falhas.
Sendo que quando
Srs, utilizei o howto abaixo para configurar o meu sendmail com relay do
gmail:
http://linuxconfig.org/configuring-gmail-as-sendmail-email-relay
Funcionou perfeitamente no gmail, no entanto quando tento executar o mesmo
procedimento para o meu domínio no meu provedor ele da diversas falhas.
Sendo
rodrigo.root...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Srs, utilizei o howto abaixo para configurar o meu sendmail com relay do
gmail:
http://linuxconfig.org/configuring-gmail-as-sendmail-email-relay
Funcionou perfeitamente no gmail, no entanto quando tento executar o mesmo
procedimento para o meu domínio no meu
On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 19:10:05 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
OK, here we go.
mailx -v -s TEST 141014_184452 2xd1 rea...@jtan.com /tmp/tstmsg.txt
Two mails are being sent.
550 5.1.1 2...@2xd1.local.lan... User unknown
This one didn't make it.
Why does it go to a dead letter?
So it
I managed to get sendmail sort of working on one of my vbox guest
debian vms.
It was kind of rough sledding and still not really working properly.
I use a smarthost from fastmail.fm where I have accounts. Finally
seems to have gotten the auth working thru access.db.
But an odd thing
On 2014-05-18, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
| rea...@newsguy.com... Deferred: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot
| write ./dfs4IGodqZ004450 (bfcommit, uid=0, gid=122): No such file or
| directory Closing connection to [127.0.0.1]
`
Where is sendmail trying to write? Why is sendmail
Curt cu...@free.fr writes:
On 2014-05-18, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
| rea...@newsguy.com... Deferred: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot
| write ./dfs4IGodqZ004450 (bfcommit, uid=0, gid=122): No such file or
| directory Closing connection to [127.0.0.1]
`
Where is sendmail trying
these things?
No, it's not normal. The post-install scripts should create a
working initial configuration where it at least starts up.
Try reinstalling with the --reinstall option.
apt-get install sendmail --reinstall
apt-get install sendmail-base --reinstall
apt-get install
install sendmail --reinstall
apt-get install sendmail-base --reinstall
apt-get install sendmail-bin --reinstall
Does that give any errors ?
Just those I mentioned that only required moving a few lines in
sendmail.mc
However I'm still seeing something in the smtp conversation
1 - 100 of 2982 matches
Mail list logo
