On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:10:10AM +0530, Abdullah wrote:
I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have
not got a perfect answer by googling.
I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help.
First set up a nameserver, see
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/DNS-HOWTO.gz.
I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have
not got a perfect answer by googling.
I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Carlos Mennens carlosw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleónnoela...@gmail.com wrote:
I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands
down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have
given me the
Postfix + Cyrus + SASL for simple users. You can add spamassassin +
pyzor/rzor config your SASL to use LDAP or other auth method. For me
postfix + cyrus is just a better combi.
On Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 04:13 PM, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have always
run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box I am
running on (2.4 GHz P4, 1GB RAM) is being beaten to death by java in
On 10/26/2010 06:10 AM, B. Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have
always run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box
I am running on (2.4 GHz
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
(...)
Now the mail server, since Comcast blocked port 25, is mainly used for
internal monitor/security messages, like ossec and opsview, apticron
messages, etc. So I was looking to set up an OpenVZ container, probably
sid, as a
I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
(...)
Now the mail server, since Comcast blocked port 25, is mainly used for
internal
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands
down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have
given me the flexability and security of Postfix. Not to
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, B. Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
It's dated in appearance and the lack of a back end database is what
killed it for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
I don't mind keeping my mail in a flat file rather than a db. I guess if I
were doing higher volume stuff, it might make a difference, but most of the
emails I deal with are read, deal with and delete.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Carlos Mennens carlosw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 26,
-
From: B. Alexander stor...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33
To: Debian-user Listdebian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Mail server recommendations
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0
On Ter, 26 Out 2010, B. Alexander wrote:
* roundcube for webmail
You could try IMP, part of the Horde suite for e-mail. It's only
slightly less ugly than SquirrelMail, but it is extremely powerful
feature-wise.
--
Use at own risk.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
--
To
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:18:41 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
Spamassassin is resource (ram/cpu) consuming and provided that you are
not going online (no spam) it could be omitted.
As an alternative to Roundcube (I
I think that any modern, inexpensive system (dual- or quad-core AMD
CPUs running around 3GHz, 4GB RAM) would fit the bill.
OP didnt say how many users would be using it, but it doesn't sound like
many considering his existing box. Postfix with things like clamav,
spamassiain, webmail, mysql
On 2010-10-26 14:13, Camaleón wrote:
* spamassassin (in case I ever decide to work around the port 25 block)
spampd is your friend.
* roundcube for webmail
As an alternative to Roundcube (I avoid webmail as much as I can) I would
take a look into Squirrel.
RoundCube is simply great. At
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:14:11 +0200, Andreas Weber wrote:
On 2010-10-26 14:13, Camaleón wrote:
* spamassassin (in case I ever decide to work around the port 25
block)
spampd is your friend.
AFAIK, spamd comes within SA.
* roundcube for webmail
As an alternative to Roundcube (I avoid
On 26/10/10 13:21, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, B. Alexanderstor...@gmail.com wrote:
I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
It's dated in appearance and the lack of a back end database is what
killed it for me.
You can connect
On 2010-10-26 16:42, Camaleón wrote:
Users like many things (i.e., Hotmail/Livemail :-P) but and admin has
also to care about another things (server requirements, performance,
stability and security).
adminIt's stable, since years and with many concurrent users. And the
support efforts for
On 26/10/10 12:10, B. Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have always
run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box I am
running on (2.4 GHz P4, 1GB
Andy Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:05:04PM +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual
or quad core 64-bit CPU at 2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And
of course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems.
Everything
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:05:04PM +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
quad core 64-bit CPU at 2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
is not that
Greg Folkert wrote:
I've been running this:
HP Proliant DL145 G2
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl145/
Since May 2006, of course I don't have a REALLY fast one. But the
machine supports 1 or 2 processors (single or Dual core) and 32GB of
memory. It is
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bellon:
Greg Folkert wrote:
I've been running this:
HP Proliant DL145 G2
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl145/
Since May 2006, of course I don't have a REALLY fast one. But the
machine
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 09:59 +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote:
I've been running this:
HP Proliant DL145 G2
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl145/
Since May 2006, of course I don't have a REALLY fast one. But the
machine supports 1
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:14 +0100, Richard wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bellon:
Greg Folkert wrote:
I've been running this:
HP Proliant DL145 G2
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl145/
Since May 2006, of
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 09:56 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:14 +0100, Richard wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bellon:
Greg Folkert wrote:
I've been running this:
HP Proliant DL145 G2
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:56:51AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:14 +0100, Richard wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bellon:
Greg Folkert wrote:
I've been running
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 23:05 +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
quad core 64-bit CPU at 2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything
else is not that important.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:05:04PM +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
quad core 64-bit CPU at 2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
is not that
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But not the 2.6.18-3 kernel, which, as of yesterday, was still the
default kernel for etch. See bug 401006.
OKAY, Hendrik. STOP with the nitpicking. This is a bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/07 15:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But not the 2.6.18-3 kernel, which, as of yesterday, was still the
default
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:02:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/07 15:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But not the
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
quad core 64-bit CPU at 2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
is not that important.
Anything people can recommend?
Dell PowerEdge 1950 can
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
quad core 64-bit CPU at 2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
is not that important.
Anything people can recommend?
--
Stefan Bellon
--
To
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 23:05 +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
quad core 64-bit CPU at 2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
is not that important.
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:05:04 +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual
or quad core 64-bit CPU at 2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And
of course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems.
Everything else is not that important.
i can see that my partners are soon going to be looking at
claendar server features... m$ exchange server is going to be
the touchstone -- if some of y'all'uns have experience with some
of the calendaring solutions available on debian, i'd love to
hear them.
we've got some outlook users and some
Hey you people. I want to install an IRC server in my machine, a
private one, the administration must be able to add and remove user
accounts, these account with passwds. You can't get into the network
unless invated, etc. is this possible? If so, which is the best out
there? I did
[EMAIL
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest way
to do it. This, of course, requires that your friends are
users on
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:12:09PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote..
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest
Try the free cygwin download:
http://www..cygwin.com/
Kevin Coyner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:12:09PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote..
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 02:59:35PM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
What's a good, and hopefully open source free, program that can act as
a SSH server on a Windows box? I do most of my work in Linux/Debian,
but there's one offsite webserver I have to take care of that's Win2K.
Presently I ftp
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest way
to do it. This, of course, requires that your friends are
users on your system.
-jackp
--- ScruLoose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I'm interested in making a few files available to friends of
mine, and in having an upload directory for them to give me stuff, too.
I'm wondering what's the best tool for this job.
* I'll only be talking about a very few users. (like 10 to 20 total)
* I don't have any particular
* ScruLoose [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030314 23:09 PST]:
Hi all,
I'm interested in making a few files available to friends of
mine, and in having an upload directory for them to give me stuff, too.
I'm wondering what's the best tool for this job.
* I'll only be talking about a very few
ScruLoose said:
Hi all,
I'm interested in making a few files available to friends of
mine, and in having an upload directory for them to give me stuff, too.
I'm wondering what's the best tool for this job.
The first thing that comes to mind is FTP, but I'm not sure it's the right
I am ready to set up my own Web Server rather than paying my friends each month.
Your IT guidance would be appreciated. I have a dusty Pentium 90 with 32 MB Ram, and a
1 GB Drive. The new unit will be equipped with Debian Woody, on a static DSL IP
address without any firewall. Will this meager
Dan Hunt said:
I am ready to set up my own Web Server rather than paying my friends each
month.
Your IT guidance would be appreciated. I have a dusty Pentium 90 with 32
MB Ram, and a 1 GB Drive. The new unit will be equipped with Debian Woody,
on a static DSL IP address without any firewall.
hi ya dan
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Dan Hunt wrote:
I am ready to set up my own Web Server rather than paying my friends each month.
Your IT guidance would be appreciated. I have a dusty Pentium 90 with 32 MB Ram,
and a 1 GB Drive. The new unit will be equipped with Debian Woody, on a
static
nate said:
I'm sure people will disagree but I strongly do not reccomend running a
system, even a minimal one with less then 64MB of ram. If your using zope
you probably want something more powerful. My experience with zope is
limited to Zwiki, but I have noticed that it takes 100 to 200 or
-- Dan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Wednesday, 18 December 2002, 08:58 PM -0600):
I am ready to set up my own Web Server rather than paying my friends each month.
Your IT guidance would be appreciated. I have a dusty Pentium 90 with
32 MB Ram, and a 1 GB Drive. The new unit will be
If you want to run a database backend for a CMS (if I remember
correctly, that's what drupal is, right?), you'll need even more RAM --
my machine slowed noticably when I've run mysql in the past. But it's
certainly do-able on this hardware, and the ram for these machines is
still fairly easily
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Eugene van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Any recommendations for a IMAP server (on Debian 2.2)? IMAP4.7c (I
think this is UW IMAP?)
On Solaris, I've had a great amount of success with the Courier-IMAP
suite. Courier-IMAP only uses Maildirs, which is a newer mailbox storage
format that
Hi,
Any recommendations for a IMAP server (on Debian 2.2)? IMAP4.7c (I think this
is UW IMAP?) seems to intergrates relatively painless and support most IMAP
features (although I couldn't find anything on shared folders), courier-imap
seems technically better(?) but confusing to set up
On Wed 2001-04-04 (10:41), Eugene van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Any recommendations for a IMAP server (on Debian 2.2)? IMAP4.7c (I
think this is UW IMAP?) seems to intergrates relatively painless and
support most IMAP features (although I couldn't find anything on
shared folders), courier-imap seems
Thanks, I'll courier looks like it then :-)
With exim I saw the debian docs for courier indicate that I set Exim up for
maildir delivery - will the POP3 server pick the mail up correctly from the
maildir
then? also will the pop client (if not set to leave a copy on the server) kill
the
mail
On Wed 2001-04-04 (15:59), Eugene van Zyl wrote:
Thanks, I'll courier looks like it then :-)
With exim I saw the debian docs for courier indicate that I set Exim up for
maildir delivery - will the POP3 server pick the mail up correctly from the
maildir
then? also will the pop client (if
Disclaimer: I'm the UW imapd maintainer so I'm biased. :-)
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Eugene van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Any recommendations for a IMAP server (on Debian 2.2)? IMAP4.7c (I
think this is UW IMAP?)
Yes.
seems to intergrates relatively painless and
support most IMAP features (although I
59 matches
Mail list logo
