On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:39:58PM BST, Camaleón wrote:
If it's not available through easy install system, e.g APT, then yes.
Only Windows system lacks for a ssh client on a default install and this
can be easily solved with one of the mentioned programs that don't
require even
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:21:17 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:39:58PM BST, Camaleón wrote:
If it's not available through easy install system, e.g APT, then yes.
Only Windows system lacks for a ssh client on a default install and
this can be easily solved with one of the
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 04:39:28PM BST, Claudius Hubig wrote:
SSH (Secure Shell) - you don't need security on home-only network.
That at least explains the millions of bots out there. Of course you
need security on a home-only network, even if it is not accessible
from the internet. And
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:46:54PM BST, Arno Schuring wrote:
SSH (Secure Shell) - you don't need security on home-only network.
That depends. If you're running a wireless setup, even with WPA2
protection, I'd still advise security.
Let's not get paranoid - firewall + RSN should be enough on a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:33:55AM BST, yudi v wrote:
Samba looks like the best option as I will be adding windows clients and a
solaris file server.
You hadn't mentioned Windows previously.
Had you provided that information at the beginning I would've suggested
Samba as well.
Regards,
--
Raf
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:15:09PM BST, Camaleón wrote:
SSH is still the winner, IMO: Solaris and linux include ssh client
facilities and windows has WinSCP or FileZilla that allow SFTP
connections.
Too many 3rd party software programs required, most of them don't
integrate with the rest of
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:01:46 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:15:09PM BST, Camaleón wrote:
SSH is still the winner, IMO: Solaris and linux include ssh client
facilities and windows has WinSCP or FileZilla that allow SFTP
connections.
Too many 3rd party software programs
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 05:12:20PM BST, Camaleón wrote:
Too many 3rd party software programs required, most of them don't
integrate with the rest of the system nicely or at all, e.g. explorer,
cmd.exe.
One program is too many for you? ;-)
If it's not available through easy install
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:33:29 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 05:12:20PM BST, Camaleón wrote:
Too many 3rd party software programs required, most of them don't
integrate with the rest of the system nicely or at all, e.g.
explorer, cmd.exe.
One program is too many for
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:33:55 +1000, yudi v wrote:
even for Linux-only systems, there really is no
satisfactory answer to the OP's question besides Samba/CIFS.
Samba looks like the best option as I will be adding windows clients and
a solaris file server.
SSH is still the winner, IMO:
I have a Debian PC connected to the Internet via mobile broadband and I have
this Internet connection shared with an ubuntu pc via Ethernet connection.
Internet connection works fine.
I can ping the Debian PC but cannot ping the Ubuntu PC, how come?
I would like to share files between these two
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:25:16 +1000, yudi v wrote:
I have a Debian PC connected to the Internet via mobile broadband and I
have this Internet connection shared with an ubuntu pc via Ethernet
connection. Internet connection works fine.
I can ping the Debian PC but cannot ping the Ubuntu PC,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:25:16AM BST, yudi v wrote:
I have a Debian PC connected to the Internet via mobile broadband and I have
this Internet connection shared with an ubuntu pc via Ethernet connection.
Internet connection works fine.
Let me recap:
Internet over mobile --- Debian PC ---
Raf Czlonka r...@linuxstuff.pl writes:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:25:16AM BST, yudi v wrote:
I have a Debian PC connected to the Internet via mobile broadband and I have
this Internet connection shared with an ubuntu pc via Ethernet connection.
Internet connection works fine.
Let me recap:
El 2011-10-23 a las 22:40 +1000, yudi v escribió:
(sending back to the list)
Is Ubuntu using some sort of firewall preventing/rejecting/dropping
pingsover the local network? :-?
Yes it was the firewall. Thanks
Ah, great :-)
Yes, for sharing files it is easier to open nautilus and open
Both, samba and nfs can
be overkill for sharing a bunch of files and even harder to manage
and setup. OTOH, SSH is just a matter of installing the corresponding
package and that's all.
SSH will not only help you to securely transmit the files between the
two computers but will also help
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:52:14PM BST, Harry Putnam wrote:
I don't understand why a few people have passed over ssh as being
overkill.
SSH (Secure Shell) - you don't need security on home-only network.
Its easiest of all to setup. (well excepting the nautilus suggestion)
IMHO, it's not -
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:27:46 +1000, yudi v wrote:
Both, samba and nfs can
be overkill for sharing a bunch of files and even harder to manage and
setup. OTOH, SSH is just a matter of installing the corresponding
package and that's all.
SSH will not only help you to securely transmit the
Raf Czlonka r...@linuxstuff.pl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:52:14PM BST, Harry Putnam wrote:
I don't understand why a few people have passed over ssh as being
overkill.
SSH (Secure Shell) - you don't need security on home-only network.
That at least explains the millions of bots out
Raf Czlonka (r...@linuxstuff.pl on 2011-10-23 15:39 +0100):
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:52:14PM BST, Harry Putnam wrote:
I don't understand why a few people have passed over ssh as being
overkill.
SSH (Secure Shell) - you don't need security on home-only network.
That depends. If you're
even for Linux-only systems, there really is no
satisfactory answer to the OP's question besides Samba/CIFS.
Samba looks like the best option as I will be adding windows clients and a
solaris file server.
--
Kind regards,
Yudi
21 matches
Mail list logo
