On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 11:09:46AM -0700, Matheson wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my slink to potato with the three cd-set
> of binaries, but I don't know what my sources.list should look
> like to include all three cd's. If someone could please send
Hey,
I'm trying to upgrade my slink to potato with the
three cd-set of binaries, but I don't know what my sources.list should look like
to include all three cd's. If someone could please send me an example
file, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
Cameron Matheson
Just completed the upgrade Slink to Potato using CDs.
Everything went perfectly; a really excellent operation. Congratulations
and thanks to the Debian developers!
Anthony
--
Anthony Campbell - running Linux Debian 2.2 (Windows-free zone)
Book Reviews: http://www.cix.co.uk/~acampbell
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:19, virtanen wrote:
> I'm thinking that it might be nice to upgrade for potato now when I've got
> slink working more or less well.
>
> My problem with installing directly potato did not work, because the wd
> module needed for my old ethernet card did not work with th
Hi,
I'm thinking that it might be nice to upgrade for potato now when I've got
slink working more or less well.
My problem with installing directly potato did not work, because the wd
module needed for my old ethernet card did not work with the kernel.
It was pointed out by 'Nathan' on this l
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 18:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I recently upgraded my slink box to potato with apt. Everything works
> well but the new ssh:
>
> neptun:/home/papt# dpkg --configure ssh
> Setting up ssh (1.2.3-5) ...
^
I think this was fixed around -7, an
Hi!
I recently upgraded my slink box to potato with apt. Everything works
well but the new ssh:
neptun:/home/papt# dpkg --configure ssh
Setting up ssh (1.2.3-5) ...
dpkg: error processing ssh (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Errors were encountered
"voy1d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fact that the commands are different, for example bitchx instead
> of
> BitchX and everything I foudn was out of date.
> voy1d
Have you used Debian? Storm *is* Debian with a few extras. Someone who
is used to Debian could use a Storm system and not be aware
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrading Storm (slink) to Potato
> "voy1d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was using Storm for a while, and I just got so pissed off with the
> > fact
> > the packages were all wrong that I gave up and went back
"Paul McHale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone done this yet? Could you give details including
> sources.list
> lines used? I want to run potato due to increased apps support. I
> might
> just wait for Storm to release a new distro based on potato.
No problem. My /etc/apt/sources.list fo
"voy1d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was using Storm for a while, and I just got so pissed off with the
> fact
> the packages were all wrong that I gave up and went back to Debian.
> But
> yeah, they don't really look after the updates etc, so I wouldn't
> bother
> with it.
Huh? Which packages
9, 2000 11:40 AM
Subject: Upgrading Storm (slink) to Potato
> Has anyone done this yet? Could you give details including sources.list
> lines used? I want to run potato due to increased apps support. I might
> just wait for Storm to release a new distro based on potato.
>
&
Has anyone done this yet? Could you give details including sources.list
lines used? I want to run potato due to increased apps support. I might
just wait for Storm to release a new distro based on potato.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
Paul McHale
Work: 937-253-7610 Double E Soluti
Greetings. Thanks to all who offered assistance on my upgrade from
Debian 2.1 to "frozen potato". The process went fairly well, apart
from a circular dependency that was resolved by re-installing 2.1 with
the 2.2 kernel. However, there seems to be an intermittent problem
with the dynamic linker (ld
If you hav a cable, DSL, or T* connection, wait for potato to stablize,
then run apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade
Alex Kwan wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Because I am afraid the upgrade will loss my
> nstalled application and user's information.
> What is the safe way to
Hi!
Because I am afraid the upgrade will loss my
nstalled application and user's information.
What is the safe way to upgrade slink to potato?
Thanks
Taupter wrote:
>
> I was poking update-alternatives, but didn't find a way to point my
> default window manager to /usr/local/bin/gnome-session.
> Yes I did read the man 8 update-alternatives, but it was a bit confusing
> to me (as I think it is a bit confusing to anyone but the man writer aka
> I
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:11:19AM -0300, Taupter wrote:
> I compiled gnome, wmaker and a large bunch of X-related software, and I
> was using a file in the /etc/X11/ (I can't remember its name, since it
> was deleted during the upgrade) to set my default window manager to
> /usr/local/bin/gnome-se
Hello!
First, I'm proud of Debian!
I upgraded my Debian system to Potato this weekend, and everything went
really fine! Enven my glibc 2.0.7 programs ran (almost all)!
Thank you all developers! Go ahead! Make the world better!
Second, I'm a bit confused about one point:
I compiled gnome, wmak
Hello all
I'm near from upgrading my Slink to Potato using dselect's FTP, but I'm
afraid if it can drive my system _really_ bad (broken).
I tried it six months ago, and the result was a reinstalling Slink from
CDs.
Did anyone try this way? Worked fine?
Taupter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Moore, Paul) wrote:
> >Aargh. In order to run dhcpcd on 2.2.14, I need the version from
> >unstable (frozen, I guess). But that depends on the unstable version
> >of libc6, which depends on the unstable version of debianutils
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Moore, Paul) wrote:
>Aargh. In order to run dhcpcd on 2.2.14, I need the version from
>unstable (frozen, I guess). But that depends on the unstable version
>of libc6, which depends on the unstable version of debianutils, which
>depends on the unstable version of libc6
>
>If I
Apologies if people have seen this before. I initially sent it via the news
gateway at our site as I was having trouble getting subscribed, but I'm not
convinced that the gateway is making it to the full mailing list (other
messages I've sent that way are not in the archives). Now that I've got
mys
um, is it possible to upgrade to potato from slink yet? when I try, I get
problems with recursive pre-dependencies between libc6, ldso, and
debianutils. I think I broke my system (I sort of expected to) by forcing
things, but once things are fixed, I will want to upgrade again.
please CC repli
Ok, this problem has me totally stumped. I have upgraded from slink ->
potato twice in the past without any problems. But on this new
installation of slink, after I changed my /etc/apt/sources.list to look
like:
# Use for a local mirror - remove the ftp1 http lines for the bits
# your mirror conta
We're running into a problem with the version of glibc that's on our
news server, which is running slink. I've dist-upgraded a firewall
machine at home a few weeks ago without a hitch but the machine at the
office is a news server that handles over 4 gig of alt.binaries
newsgroups a day (we handle
On Sat, Jan 15, 2000 at 01:01:51PM -0800, Michael Perry wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I just got dsl here so have a system I would like to take from slink to
> potato using the apt-get install dist-upgrade. Has anyone done this
> recently? Any issues?
I did the upgrade last friday o
On Sat, Jan 15, 2000 at 01:56:51PM -0800, Michael Perry wrote:
> I just got dsl here so have a system I would like to take from slink to
> potato using the apt-get install dist-upgrade. Has anyone done this
> recently? Any issues? Also would just like to say thanks to everyone that
&
Hi all-
I just got dsl here so have a system I would like to take from slink to
potato using the apt-get install dist-upgrade. Has anyone done this
recently? Any issues? Also would just like to say thanks to everyone that
develops for Debian and to the mailing list for all the great advice
-
Please reply to debian-user@lists.debian.org
or directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Hello,
I want to upgrade my Debian Linux Box from slink to potato. I have got a
4-CD copy of the potato
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Patrick Dahiroc wrote:
: thanks for the info on Potato. if i do decide to go to Potato is there
: something i should be wary of. it appears from the other distro that the
: 2.2 kernel is working fine. does Potato have any specific issues with the
: 2.2 kernel i.e is so
*- On 31 Dec, Patrick Dahiroc wrote about "RE: Kernel Upgrade: Slink to Potato"
> thanks for the info on Potato. if i do decide to go to Potato is there
> something i should be wary of. it appears from the other distro that the
> 2.2 kernel is working fine. does Potato have
under kernel 2.2?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Brian Servis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: 12/30/99 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: Kernel Upgrade: Slink to Potato
*- On 30 Dec, Patrick Dahiroc wrote about "Kernel Upgrade: Slink to
Potato"
> hi
>
&
*- On 30 Dec, Patrick Dahiroc wrote about "Kernel Upgrade: Slink to Potato"
> hi
>
> i'm thinking of upgrading to Potato - from what i've read is that Potato is
> pretty safe to use - i realize that i need to upgrade my kernel to do this.
potato should run just
On 30-Dec-1999 Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> Alternatively you could install the kernel source and create your own
> package.
>
> apt-get install kernel-package kernel-source-
> cd /usr/src
> tar xIf kernel-source-.tar.bz2
> cd kernel-source-
> make config # or make menuconfig or make x
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Patrick Dahiroc wrote:
: hi
:
: i'm thinking of upgrading to Potato - from what i've read is that Potato is
: pretty safe to use - i realize that i need to upgrade my kernel to do this.
: If is give the commands
: root> apt-get update
: root> apt-get dist-upg
hi
i'm thinking of upgrading to Potato - from what i've read is that Potato is
pretty safe to use - i realize that i need to upgrade my kernel to do this.
If is give the commands
root> apt-get update
root> apt-get dist-upgrade
with the sources.list pointing to unstable. will this
On 27-Dec-1999 Mark Brown wrote:
> No, no reinstall should be required - for me, one of the great things
> about Debian is that it supports in-place upgrades on running systems
> (you don't have to boot an installer or anything). Just pointing apt or
> dselect at a source of potato packages and u
On Sun, Dec 26, 1999 at 11:00:52PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> I am running potato on my other machine, but I want to upgrade my laptop from
> Slink to Potato. If I understand correctly, you had to install a whole new
> Potato system from scratch. That is exactly what I want to avoid;
On 27-Dec-1999 Mark Brown wrote:
>
> PCMCIA support depends upon some kernel modules which are provided in a
> seperate package to the kernel. When you install a new kernel you also
> need to install a version of these modules that matches your new kernel.
>
I did that, but still lost pcmcia.
On 27-Dec-1999 Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
>
> BTW, I didn't know about the debian-laptop list until today. That might be
> the best place to discuss this.
I did not know until now :)
thanks
--
Andrew
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 07:18:09PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> I broke my pcmcia stuff and I am unable to fix it. I think it has to do with
> trying to install a kernel the Debian way. I will trying reinstalling a small
> slink system and then upgrade via ppp. If that does not work, I will have to
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 27-Dec-1999 Nathan O. Siemers wrote:
> >
> > One apparrent success: apt-get dist-upgrade slink -> potato on an old
> > ast laptop. The kernel is actually 2.0.29 and hasn't been changed for
> > a long time! (I still have it so I don't break my pcmcia e
On 27-Dec-1999 Nathan O. Siemers wrote:
>
> One apparrent success: apt-get dist-upgrade slink -> potato on an old
> ast laptop. The kernel is actually 2.0.29 and hasn't been changed for
> a long time! (I still have it so I don't break my pcmcia ethernet,
> mostly due to laziness).
I broke my pc
thout serious problems.
>
> I am running potato on my other machine, but I want to upgrade my laptop from
> Slink to Potato. If I understand correctly, you had to install a whole new
> Potato system from scratch. That is exactly what I want to avoid; I want to
> upgrade the syst
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am running potato on my other machine, but I want to upgrade my
> laptop from
> Slink to Potato. If I understand correctly, you had to install a
> whole new
> Potato system from scratch. That is exactly what I want to avoid; I
boot, and I
> didn't manage to repair it using a rescue disk. The only sollution was to
> install the whole system new from the scratch. :-(
>
> But I'd say that potato is stable enough to use it without serious problems.
I am running potato on my other machine, but I w
On Sun, Dec 26, 1999 at 07:42:37PM -, Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 26-Dec-1999 kometboy wrote:
[Updating to potato]
> Thanks for your thoughts on the subject. I could be wrong, but it seems I saw
> more than a few posts from people who had upgraded and had some not-so-minor
> problems. Unless so
On 26-Dec-1999 kometboy wrote:
> I am a reformed Red Hat user. I've upgraded to potato on both my
> machines, and have had no significant problems, other than the
> occasional updated package that is broken. These are usually fixed in
> a day or two, and info about them is always available on this
Pollywog wrote:
>
> I recall seeing many posts about systems being rendered unusable or broken
> after upgrade from Slink to Potato. Is this still a problem? I do not want
> to try it if I will just break my system.
I am a reformed Red Hat user. I've upgraded to potato on
I recall seeing many posts about systems being rendered unusable or broken
after upgrade from Slink to Potato. Is this still a problem? I do not want
to try it if I will just break my system.
thanks
--
Andrew
-
GnuPG Public KeyID: 0x48109681
*we all live downstream*
> Hi,
>
> Could anyone tell me exactly how how to upgrade from slink to potato with apt?
>
Assuming you have suitable /etc/apt/apt.conf and /etc/apt/sources.list:
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
Hi,
Could anyone tell me exactly how how to upgrade from slink to potato with apt?
Thanks
Rick
Rick Knebel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Fluch wrote:
> There are some debian packages for that: bug and reportbug
Please don't report another bug about that. Instead, read any of these bugs:
#47363, #50286, #50540, #52052, #46270, #50286, #50540, or #52052
--
see shy jo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Svante Signell wrote:
> Since I'm new to Debian I don't know where to report (possible) bugs
> yet I'm posting it here. Please advise me to the correct list next
> time. The lists subscribed to so far are: debian-announce,
> debian-news, deb
> "Svante" == Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Note: the potato version is unstable, and you are more likely
to encounter problems with it rather then slink.
However, if you are willing to submit bug reports, I am
sure that most developers will be grateful.
Svante> Hello, Since
Hello,
Since I'm new to Debian I don't know where to report (possible) bugs
yet I'm posting it here. Please advise me to the correct list next
time. The lists subscribed to so far are: debian-announce,
debian-news, debian-change, debian-user.
Upgrading from slink emacs or xemacs resulted in an u
Hello,
Since I'm new to Debian I don't know where to report (possible) bugs
yet I'm posting it here. Please advise me to the correct list next
time. The lists subscribed to so far are: debian-announce,
debian-news, debian-change, debian-user.
Output when installing debiandoc-sgml:
Cannot find te
This is a very interesting message. Thanks to both of you. Unfortunately,
this is still quite obscure for me, as I am definitely a newbie (forced to
upgrade from slink to potato to make my laptop work).
How can I install a library (by hand)?
Bye
Alessandro
P.S. non-technical intriguing
I downloaded a week old potato snapshot
binary-i386 and binary-all directories
what should i do now ? i don't want to upgrade every package manually. Is there
any rules how can i use apt-get across my LAN
to upgrade distro automatically ?
--
+-------------------
Graham Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I went that path also (dist-upgrade to get potato) and had some of the
> same problems.
>
> The most serious for me was that my pcmcia modem card stopped working
> somewhere along the way.
I also have had this problem. One thing that makes my mode
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 10:24:03PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/lib/libslang.so (No such file
> or directory), skipping
> ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libtcpwrapGK.so.1 is not a symlink
> ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libomnithread.so.2
Dan Christensen wrote:
> o Does potato contain all of the Y2K upgrades in slink and a half?
> And all current security updates?
Yes.
> - Throughout the upgrade I got the following message:
>
> Cannot find termcap: Can't find a valid termcap file at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.004/Term/Re
Hi Dan,
I went that path also (dist-upgrade to get potato) and had some of the
same problems.
The most serious for me was that my pcmcia modem card stopped working
somewhere along the way. After recompiling kernels and pcmcia and
different options etc I gave up. I reinstalled (slink) from scra
Last night I upgraded my fairly stock slink machine to potato using
"apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade". I have various questions.
The last group of questions is about all the errors that occurred.
o Does potato contain all of the Y2K upgrades in slink and a half?
And all current security up
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 10:35:52PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote
> Hello,
>
> I recently installed slink on a new SCSI disk for my dual oc 450 MHz
> Celeron machine. (suse 6.2 is already on an IDE disk).
>
> Since I'm new to .deb-based systems I would like to ask a few questions:
>
> (I have been
Hello,
I recently installed slink on a new SCSI disk for my dual oc 450 MHz
Celeron machine. (suse 6.2 is already on an IDE disk).
Since I'm new to .deb-based systems I would like to ask a few questions:
(I have been running RedHat since 5.0 up to 6.1 and rawhide, mandrake
6.1 and suse 6.2 on di
Salman Ahmed wrote:
...
> Although I don't advocate (re)compiling kernels your situation sounds
> like one where it might help. Have you tried to compile a kernel from
> sources ? Either the 2.0.36 or one of the 2.2.x ones. Another poster to
> this thread mentioned this as well. You might want to
Ben Collins wrote:
...
> Please stop trolling for comparisons here. Comparing how Debian works, to
> how RedHat works, is like comparing Church and Government. They are two
> different things, and have two different philosophies.
Agree.
If somebody wants to compare things, compare Linux with NT.
> I'm having major problems upgrading from slink to potato (stable to
> unstable apt sources). After one of the packages is being setup, I get
> a whole list of stuff like this:
> depmod: /lib/modules/2.0.36/pcmcia/SOMETHING.o is not owned by root
OK, I think we're getting
On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 06:54:54PM -0500, Bart Szyszka wrote:
> RH's mailing lists have more people which means more people to
> volunteer to answer questions. When I go to newsgroups, it's easy to
> spot a good or bad one. In a bad one, you'll see a list of posts with
RedHat has tech support _emp
> Another thing to consider, this is a volunteer list. People reply when
> they can and when they have time. No one is *obliged* to reply to every
> single post made to debian-user.
Right, but it's a bit disheartening for me when I don't get help from the
Debian community when I know I could easily
Hello,
Did you install a new kernel when you upgraded to potato?? If so, did you
install from
sources or from a kernel image?
I updated from slink to potato on my laptop at the weekend and had no real
problems with
the upgrade. However, I did make sure that I had all the packages I needed in
Hi,
I'm having major problems upgrading from slink to potato (stable to
unstable apt sources). After one of the packages is being setup, I get
a whole list of stuff like this:
depmod: /lib/modules/2.0.36/pcmcia SOMETHING.o is not owned by root
Then after something related to PCMCIA
is it time for potato? If yes, how? apt-get?
I am running debian 2.1r3.
-gnana
Damir J. Naden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm asking this because when I install (by ignoring libc6
> =>2.1 dependancy) imagemagick or xfig from potato on a slink system
> (along with whatever they depend on- the dpkg is installing them
> cleanly), all I get is segfaults galore. That indicates t
Hi Greg Wooledge; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> Damon Muller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > If I want to
> > check out something that is only in Potato, I go and use apt-get to grab
> > and install it. If it uses glibc2.1, it'll get that, and any other libs
> > that it depends on.
>
> Y
Damon Muller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If I want to
> check out something that is only in Potato, I go and use apt-get to grab
> and install it. If it uses glibc2.1, it'll get that, and any other libs
> that it depends on.
Yup.
> Being `binary compatible', does this mean that all the apps tha
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:21:18PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to state:
> >
> > That was supposed to be the point of my message -- In my experience,
> > upgrading from glibc 2.0 to 2.1 is *trivial*, and needs no special
> > consideration, migration guides, hand-holding sessions, or support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Damir J. Naden wrote:
> I have been in this thread way too long :-), but ... I have to agree
> with Damon's post. And I have been told that glibc2.1 and glibc2.0 are
> binary compatible.
Glibc 2.1 is binary compatible with glibc 2.0. That me
>
> That was supposed to be the point of my message -- In my experience,
> upgrading from glibc 2.0 to 2.1 is *trivial*, and needs no special
> consideration, migration guides, hand-holding sessions, or support
> groups.
>
> Stop whining and just do it.
>
> -Miles
>
> p.s. The `stop whining' b
"Damir J. Naden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been told that glibc2.1 and glibc2.0 are binary compatible.
For most purposes, they are. Of course this is software, and software
has bugs, so there are almost certainly odd cases where things don't
work; but they appear to be quite the except
Hi Miles Bader; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Because of the developments such as glibc2.1, perl, and probably
> > numerous other things, you can't take something out of Potato and put it
> > on a Slink system and expect it to work. It's an all-o
Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because of the developments such as glibc2.1, perl, and probably
> numerous other things, you can't take something out of Potato and put it
> on a Slink system and expect it to work. It's an all-or-nothing
> arrangement. They may both be `GNU/Linux', but t
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 03:38:05AM +0100, Mark Brown was heard to state:
> > > The stable GNOME packages are actually produced by the Debian
> > > maintainers - they're just distributed from the GNOME site.
>
> > So, why would they not be introduced into slink-proposed-updates?
>
> The only thing
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 10:02:55PM -0400, Damir J. Naden wrote:
> Hi Mark Brown; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> > That idea is intented to be closer to unstable than stable - at this
> > point, there would probably be as much hassle updating to the in-between
> > release as there is updatin
Hi Mark Brown; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> Damir, are you sure mutt is using vim? If you have nvi installed and
> haven't adjusted the alternatives vi will default to that and if you
> normally use a shell alias to select your vi mutt won't pick that up.
Yup, I'm positive. I am a contro
Hi Miles Bader; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There's a howto somewhere on the Debian site saying which packages have to
> > be updated to use a 2.2 kernel with Slink.
>
> Do you have any idea where this would be? I've been searching the
> debian site
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's a howto somewhere on the Debian site saying which packages have to
> be updated to use a 2.2 kernel with Slink.
Do you have any idea where this would be? I've been searching the
debian site for this kind of info with no luck. I did try a 2.2.10
kernel,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I've been slowly upgrading my packages from slink to potato, and
> > frankly, have never had a single problem.
>
> How are you doing this? Do you just go get the packages and 'dpkg -i' them
> or do you use apt? There are a bun
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 01:55:22AM -0500, Brad wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Damir J. Naden wrote:
> > Hi Brad; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> > > Hmmm... exactly 80-column lines, more or less. 72 or 76 is much better
> > > though, it leaves room for replies.
> > Ooops, sorry, I don't know h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Damir J. Naden wrote:
> Hi Brad; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> > Hmmm... exactly 80-column lines, more or less. 72 or 76 is much better
> > though, it leaves room for replies.
>
> Ooops, sorry, I don't know how that happened; my vimr
Hi Brad; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> Hmmm... exactly 80-column lines, more or less. 72 or 76 is much better
> though, it leaves room for replies.
Ooops, sorry, I don't know how that happened; my vimrc files specs 76 columns,
maybe I need separate command in muttrc?
> I'm not sure what
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 09:17:07AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice is this information was collated at one location so
> that people could build on what's already been done and not have to try
> everything new every time. That's what open source is about--sharing.
> What I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, B. Szyszka wrote:
> > As for the version, i'd go with the latest stable (2.2.12, unless they
> > released 2.2.13 just today). There's even a brand new Debian package so
> > you won't have to compile your own if you don't want.
>
> Where woul
> As for the version, i'd go with the latest stable (2.2.12, unless they
> released 2.2.13 just today). There's even a brand new Debian package so
> you won't have to compile your own if you don't want.
Where would I be able to find that package?
--
Bart Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:4982727
B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My real question is: To upgrade from slink to potato, should I go to a
> 2.2 kernel under slink first? I know those issues are documented on
> the Debian site. If so, what kernel version is most likely t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hmmm... exactly 80-column lines, more or less. 72 or 76 is much better
though, it leaves room for replies.
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Damir J. Naden wrote:
> Hi Brad; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
>
> ---stuff snipped here--
>
> > Depending on the particular p
in the mailing list archives and found that a kernel
upgrade should fix it.
My real question is: To upgrade from slink to potato, should I go to a
2.2 kernel under slink first? I know those issues are documented on
the Debian site. If so, what kernel version is most likely to prevent
further
Hi Brad; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
---stuff snipped here--
> Depending on the particular package, recompiling for slink can be as
> simple as "apt-get --compile source packagename" (with a new enough
> version of apt, of course). The versioned Perl dependancies and such can
> be fixed b
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
