Randy Edwards writes:
I'm working up a default reply now that points people to Corel's support
newsgroups...or should we instead work to bring those folks away from the
dark side? :-)
I consider them all new Debian users.
What are Corel plans for the future of their Debian venture? Will
Shaul Karl writes:
What are Corel plans for the future of their Debian venture? Will they
release updates, Corel-potato, make their release larger etc?
I haven't the foggiest idea what their plans are. They are very secretive.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood,
actually sounds kinda scary.
Flashback to when AOL entered the Internet?! :-)
I dunno, I'm working up a default reply now that points people to Corel's
support newsgroups...or should we instead work to bring those folks away
from the dark side? :-)
--
Regards,| Debian
Joe Block wrote:
When I did the install on my friend's laptop, the first thing I did
after corel's install was done was add my local mirror of slink,
security.debian.org, the y2k updates the XFree86 3.3.5 to its
sources.list and update upgrade.
I went ahead and did a Corel to slink
Randy Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joe Block wrote:
When I did the install on my friend's laptop, the first thing I did
after corel's install was done was add my local mirror of slink,
security.debian.org, the y2k updates the XFree86 3.3.5 to its
sources.list and update
*- On 5 Dec, Arcady Genkin wrote about XFree86 3.3.5 for slink? (was: Corel
to Slink upgrade)
Randy Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joe Block wrote:
When I did the install on my friend's laptop, the first thing I did
after corel's install was done was add my local mirror of slink
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Randy Edwards wrote:
redwarThis ought to be interesting, because as Corel establishes itself I'm
redwar sure we'll be dealing with more and more Corel users here in
Debian-User...
maybe a good time to unsubscribe ? ;)
actually sounds kinda scary.
nate
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Randy Edwards wrote:
redwar I saw that Corel left the slink entries commented out in
redwar /etc/apt/sources.list and was curious as to what would go on if someone
did
redwar an update and an apt-get dist-upgrade. I've been playing with the idea
of
redwar testing it here,
Randy Edwards wrote:
Has anyone tried taking the freebie Corel Linux install and upgrading it to
slink?
I saw that Corel left the slink entries commented out in
/etc/apt/sources.list and was curious as to what would go on if someone did
an update and an apt-get dist-upgrade. I've been
: APT removes bash on slink upgrade
Le 1999-08-12, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait :
This is due to a recent bash NMU which now pre-depends on the potato
libreadlineg2 which conflicts with the slink bash.
Bash -MUST- be re-uploaded with the proper changes made so that it can
exist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another silly newbie q: What's an NMU?
Non Maintainer Upload, it's when the debian developer can't upload to
fix a bug.
Please fix you mailer. It is tagging the subject line in some obscure
way. Please use Re: instead of SV: .
TIA - Peter Makholm
--
I congratulate
Le 1999-08-12, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait :
This is due to a recent bash NMU which now pre-depends on the potato
libreadlineg2 which conflicts with the slink bash.
Bash -MUST- be re-uploaded with the proper changes made so that it can
exist with the slink libreadlineg2 ASAP.
This is not so
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Bash -MUST- be re-uploaded with the proper changes made so that it can
exist with the slink libreadlineg2 ASAP.
This is not so simple. Bash is unusable with slink's libreadline.
Three bugs of severity important existed in the BTS for this
Jason writes:
Apparently it is usable enough to startup and run scripts. What you might
be able to get away with is to put a normal Depends: librealine on bash -
but I am not sure.
Probably the best answer is that bash should not require bash to install
itself!
A while back I had a library
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
Le 1999-08-12, Jason Gunthorpe _crivait :
This is due to a recent bash NMU which now pre-depends on the potato
libreadlineg2 which conflicts with the slink bash.
Bash -MUST- be re-uploaded with the proper changes made so that it
On 12-Aug-99 Julian Gilbey wrote:
From what I recall from the GNU ftp site, bash-2.04 includes
libreadline-4.0, so the major number *has* been bumped up. Perhaps we
could switch to that which might alleviate this problem?
I don't know what is going on, but if I put a hold on the bash
Package: bash
Version: 2.02.1-1.5
Hi all,
The current bash/libreadline dependencies in potato are formed in an
conflicts/pre-depends loop that causes APT to remove bash, install
libreadlineg2 and then try to reinstall bash (which fails because bash
needs bash to install [remove actually]..)
I'm answering my own query from Saturday 20 March 1999, in case
someone else has the same problem
(Epson Stylus Color 400 failed after Hamm - Slink upgrade).
The problem was the filter /etc/magicfilterstylus_color_720dpi-filter,
from magicfilter version 1.2-28. It's
good for Ghostscript version
On Tue, 25 May 1999, Mike O'Donnell wrote:
The problem was the filter /etc/magicfilterstylus_color_720dpi-filter,
from magicfilter version 1.2-28. It's
good for Ghostscript version 3.33, and possibly 4.03, but not 5.50
which I am running. I replaced the
PostScript section of the filter
I've just noticed that my hamm - slink upgrade didn't go as smoothly as
I thought. The new libraries were installed into /lib but the symlinks
point to the old ones. A full list is appended but here is libc:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 19 15:04 /lib/libc.so.6 -
libc-2.0.7.so
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 3/22/99 10:21:50 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
labs.com writes:
Force of habit, I suppose Maybe it's time to remove the man pages for
those programs that also have info pages, eh?
Don't remove the manpages. And
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Mike Nachlinger wrote:
Got a mixed slink/potatoe system.
Bought the CheapBytes 2.1 disks.
apt-cdrom add outputs;
Using CD-ROM mount point /cdrom/
Unmounting CD-ROM
Please insert a Disc in the drive and press any key Mounting CD-ROM
Identifying.. apt-cdrom: error
Got a mixed slink/potatoe system.
Bought the CheapBytes 2.1 disks.
apt-cdrom add outputs;
Using CD-ROM mount point /cdrom/
Unmounting CD-ROM
Please insert a Disc in the drive and press any key Mounting CD-ROM
Identifying.. apt-cdrom: error in loading shared libraries
On Fri, Apr 02, 1999 at 09:53:24AM -0800, Mike Nachlinger wrote:
Got a mixed slink/potatoe system.
Bought the CheapBytes 2.1 disks.
apt-cdrom add outputs;
Using CD-ROM mount point /cdrom/
Unmounting CD-ROM
Please insert a Disc in the drive and press any key Mounting CD-ROM
Hey guys,
Since I have upgraded to slink
I have noticed that when I unzip certain tars in /usr/local the binaries
seem to have trouble finding the required libs. For example, Wingz3 can't
find libXpm.so.4 although it is in /usr/X11R6/lib. Wingz3 worked with hamm.
Has there been some kind of
Hey guys,
Since I have upgraded to slink
I have noticed that when I unzip certain tars in /usr/local the binaries
seem to have trouble finding the required libs. For example, Wingz3 can't
find libXpm.so.4 although it is in /usr/X11R6/lib. Wingz3 worked with hamm.
Has there been some
When I use
apt-get update
It gets beyond the system integrity check and prints OK, then it gives a
segmentation fault.
Is there a known fix for this?
HM == Hamish Moffatt schrieb am 24 Mar 1999 23:19:54 +0100:
HM IMHO, the info browser (in emacs or standalone) adds little
HM functionality over a plain HTML document, except that it is much
HM less accessible for non-emacs users.
I disagree. What if you don't have lynx installed and _need_
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 10:24:29AM +0100, Holger Schauer wrote:
MB == Mark Brown schrieb am 23 Mar 1999 03:32:21 +0100:
MB everything-HTML conversion seems to be the most likely route
MB for those that want a standard interface at present.
I am strongly against having a _single_ interface
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 10:24:29AM +0100, Holger Schauer wrote:
IMO man pages serve as a quick thorough overview and should be as
compact as possible. Info pages serve IMO a different need: they
should provide detailed information, perhaps for some more obscure or
advanced features. If _then_
On Mon, Mar 22, 1999 at 11:55:08AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
Now isn't there a utility that will create 'man' pages out of 'info'
ones? If so then at least some current information may be presented
in man format for those of us that are more used to the 'older'
This would be hard - the
MB == Mark Brown schrieb am 23 Mar 1999 03:32:21 +0100:
MB everything-HTML conversion seems to be the most likely route
MB for those that want a standard interface at present.
I am strongly against having a _single_ interface to
documentation. Diversity is a good thing, IMHO, especially in
Olaf Rogalsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would be wonderful!!! Only one single point from where to search for
documentation. If you ever executed a command like
find /usr -type f|xargs egrep -li 'proxy|squid'
then you know, that a central point for documentation would be a great time
I have to admit, there is a bit of truth to this, alot of people just don't
have the time to read 18 different documents in 18 different locations. Man
pages, info pages, FAQs, HOWTOs, mini-HOWTOs, READMEs, INSTALL docs, package
descriptions... it is a bit daunting. I do feel that
I also agree with the idea of having a single starting point for
documentation. And something I kind of wonder about - why are there always so
many documents for a given program? Can't they be combined into one document
devided into sections? With info pages, you can get to any specific section
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Force of habit, I suppose Maybe it's time to remove the man pages for
those programs that also have info pages, eh?
Don't remove the manpages. And don't start an info vs. man war, either,
please!
--
+- pgp key available
In a message dated 3/22/99 10:21:50 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
labs.com writes:
Force of habit, I suppose Maybe it's time to remove the man pages for
those programs that also have info pages, eh?
Don't remove the manpages. And don't start an info vs. man war,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've no intention of starting a flame war - but the fact remains, if the man
pages are no longer being supported by developers, there's no sense including
them in the man pages package. It just adds to the confusion.
Not true. If the manpage says this manpage is
Could someone tell me how to read info pages / find out what info pages
are available? I know this is probably a dumb question, but I don't seem to have
an info topic command - so does info use a different kind of syntax to man
or is it a special package or what?
Thanks!
Tim
[EMAIL
In a message dated 3/22/99 10:21:50 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
labs.com writes:
Force of habit, I suppose Maybe it's time to remove the man
pages for
those programs that also have info pages, eh?
Don't remove the manpages. And don't start an info vs. man war,
Timothy Hospedales [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could someone tell me how to read info pages / find out what info
pages
are available? I know this is probably a dumb question, but I don't seem to
have
an info topic command - so does info use a different kind of syntax to man
or is it
Timothy Hospedales wrote:
Could someone tell me how to read info pages / find out what info
pages
are available? I know this is probably a dumb question, but I don't seem to
have
an info topic command - so does info use a different kind of syntax to man
or is it a special package
On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Mike O'Donnell wrote:
I also have noticed some strange printer behaviour. I use magicfilter, and
have periodically had a printing problem with ps files after the upgrade.
Once it produced another page with junk on it and the other time it
printed several extra pages. Have you
I just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Everything appears to be fine,
except that my printer configuration is broken. I've hunted all the
places that I know to look for the problem, to no avail.
I'm using magicfilter with an Epson Stylus Color 400 printer. After
the upgrade to Slink
1. ASCII
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 10:36:43AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to admit, there is a bit of truth to this, alot of people just don't
have the time to read 18 different documents in 18 different locations. Man
pages, info pages, FAQs, HOWTOs, mini-HOWTOs, READMEs, INSTALL docs,
Jim McCloskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Debian, unlike most linux distributions, /usr/X11R6/bin/X is not a
symlink to the `real' X binary. It's a wrapper-program which reads a
configuration file /etc/X11R6/xserver to find out which X server to
run (and some other things).
In hamm (haven't got
I have to admit, there is a bit of truth to this, alot of people just don't
have the time to read 18 different documents in 18 different locations. Man
pages, info pages, FAQs, HOWTOs, mini-HOWTOs, READMEs, INSTALL docs, package
descriptions... it is a bit daunting. I do feel that anyone
I just upgraded to slink, and followed the instructions to delete xbase.
Lots of problems have resulted.
I am very confused by the new X stuff.
Startx wasn't installed, but I found it on the CDRom and installed it.
To get startx to work I had to make a link from /etc/X11/XF86Config to
On Mon, 15 Mar, 1999 à 01:37:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I sometimes wonder why I bother writing any documentation at all. People
will just ignore it and then chime in with profound insights like
THIS--SUCKS
when anything changes.
I have
*- On 16 Mar, Laurent PICOULEAU wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
There was a point that I liked before : the possibility to not start xdm even
if it was installed. Why ? Well sometimes I'm trying to advocates linux to
friends and showing them that you can have a graphical loggin just
I would like to say a couple of things, I am just seeing this for the
first time. I do understand now the reason that these packages were
activated, and I do appreciate the work that Branden and others do/have
done for Debian. I am sorry if I offended any developers as my comment
was pretty
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 07:45:23PM -0600, William Lacy wrote:
I don't know how I am supposed to support XFree86 if people won't read:
1) the Debian release notes
2) the Debian package descriptions
3) anything in /usr/doc/* with the string README in the filename
4) anything in /usr/doc/*
In a message dated 3/15/99 8:05:15 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Please don't slam people for not reading everything. That is why you
are needed- because they don't have time, or maybe they just aren't
capable of understanding everything- again, that is why you are
:
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:36:43 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
In a message dated 3/15/99 8:05:15 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Please don't slam people
On Mon, 15 Mar, 1999 à 08:20:25PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*- On 16 Mar, Laurent PICOULEAU wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
There was a point that I liked before : the possibility to not start xdm
even
if it was installed. Why ? Well sometimes I'm trying to advocates
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 02:40:30AM +0100, Laurent PICOULEAU wrote:
2) Edit /etc/init.d/xdm and insert an 'exit 0' at the top of the file.
Xdm will not even start or listen with this option.
Thanks for these suggestions. I'll get an eye on these possibilities ASAP.
Or just do:
chmod
The Slink upgrade went great for me.
Upgraded without rebooting. A couple of days later I needed to reboot
to run a windows program (it had been 2 weeks). I had read The great X
reorganization but forgot to remove xdm and xfs. So when I did reboot
I got the xwindows login which is why I am
*- On 14 Mar, George Bonser wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, William Lacy wrote:
I think that installing xdm and xfs as part of the upgrade is a very bad
idea for several reasons:
1) This is a very big change to my system, I have never had these
packages
*- On 14 Mar, George Bonser wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xdm was installed on your system before. It was part of the old xbase
package. The reason xdm was sucked in during the upgrade was that
because xbase was split into several
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 07:32:59PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
Well, maybe I should READ those package descriptions :)
I should make this the offical motto of the Debian X packages.
I don't know how I am supposed to support XFree86 if people won't read:
1) the Debian release notes
2) the
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 10:58:15PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
The problem is that many of the other packages DO NOT note in the package
descriptions what has changed and the other docs are only available AFTER
you have installed them unless you want to manually take it apart and look
at it
. Is it ok for me to manually remove these
directories and their contents, or will I break something?
Thanks in advance,
Rich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*- On 14 Mar, George Bonser wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xdm was installed
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 07:20:29AM +, Richard Harran wrote:
After reading this thread, I've removed xbase and (unwanted) xdm (I'll
own up, I didn't rtfm, and it caused me a problem upgrading
hamm-slink). However, I dpkg warnings:
while removeing xdm, directory /var/state/xdm not
*- On 15 Mar, Richard Harran wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
After reading this thread, I've removed xbase and (unwanted) xdm (I'll
own up, I didn't rtfm, and it caused me a problem upgrading
hamm-slink). However, I dpkg warnings:
while removeing xdm, directory /var/state/xdm
*- On 14 Mar, George Bonser wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
As a developer, I track the debian-devel-changes mailing list. I freely
admit that this is not something we can reasonably expect our users to do.
As a user, though
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 01:37:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 07:32:59PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
Well, maybe I should READ those package descriptions :)
I should make this the offical motto of the Debian X packages.
I don't know how I am supposed to
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 08:53:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*- On 15 Mar, Richard Harran wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
After reading this thread, I've removed xbase and (unwanted) xdm (I'll
own up, I didn't rtfm, and it caused me a problem upgrading
hamm-slink). However
*- On 15 Mar, Mike Merten wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 08:53:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*- On 15 Mar, Richard Harran wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
After reading this thread, I've removed xbase and (unwanted) xdm (I'll
own up, I
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 01:30:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*- On 15 Mar, Mike Merten wrote about Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 08:53:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you were removing xdm with --purge or( _ in dselect). The
My problem
Ryan Yeske wrote:
I recently did an apt-get dist-upgrade on my hamm system to upgrade to
slink. Everything worked smoothly, except now I notice that I am not
getting color in a few places that I used to, namely aalib stuff and
nethack. Where there was color before in these programs I simply
I recently did an apt-get dist-upgrade on my hamm system to upgrade to
slink. Everything worked smoothly, except now I notice that I am not
getting color in a few places that I used to, namely aalib stuff and
nethack.
Well, from what I hear from the Nethack maintainer (Ben Gertzfield),
I recently did an apt-get dist-upgrade on my hamm system to upgrade to
slink. Everything worked smoothly, except now I notice that I am not
getting color in a few places that I used to, namely aalib stuff and
nethack. Where there was color before in these programs I simply get
inverse text. ls
Hi all,
I've decided to try to upgrade to slink. My question is that according
to apt. it's going to take 8+ hours to ftp all the files. I can't have
my phone tied up that long. How can I download the files during shorter
times? If I close the connection, will apt just start where it left off?
I
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 09:00:48PM -0800, Mark Wagnon wrote:
Hi all,
[..]
my phone tied up that long. How can I download the files during shorter
times? If I close the connection, will apt just start where it left off?
Yes, if You use the apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade method
apt-get
*- On 18 Feb, Mark Wagnon wrote about hamm to slink upgrade via atp question
Hi all,
I've decided to try to upgrade to slink. My question is that according
to apt. it's going to take 8+ hours to ftp all the files. I can't have
my phone tied up that long. How can I download the files during
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can upgrade small chunks at a time by using deselect to put sections
on hold. First start by putting everything on hold by putting the
cursor over the
--- Updated packages (newer version is available) ---
line and hit the equal key(=). Then select the
Peter Berlau wrote:
Yes, if You use the apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade method
apt-get will continue where it is broken, no prloblems here (afaik) :-)
That seems to be the case here. I decided to try it out. I shut down ppp
and ctrl-c'd apt. I then restarted ppp and restarted apt-get
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 11:39:39PM -0500, Brandon Mitchell spewed forth:
gusgus:~ # ls -l /usr/man/man2/iopl.2.gz
prw--ws--- 1 505 38296 0 Jan 2 1970
/usr/man/man2/iopl.2.gz
And I can't delete it
This looks familiar. I'd suggest:
1) e2fsck -cf /dev/hd?
Haven't
is still running 2.0.31 - I was hoping to get the slink
upgrade over and done with before bringing it up to something more
modern. If a kernel upgrade will allow me to delete this file, then
I'll do it now.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
PeeWee
--
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - useless: http://www.scc.mi.org
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Jason Wright wrote:
It's obviously corrupted and bogus:
gusgus:~ # ls -l /usr/man/man2/iopl.2.gz
prw--ws--- 1 505 38296 0 Jan 2 1970 /usr/man/man2/iopl.2.gz
And I can't delete it
This looks familiar. I'd suggest:
1) e2fsck -cf /dev/hd?
2) try to
Nils wrote:
Right now I'm running Hamm. I'm pretty much a newbie to this. But what
good would it do to upgrade to slink? I had installation problems with
Hamm, like on the rescue disk when it would boot the kernel, it'd
automatically repartition my hard drive. And put 4 bogus partitions on
Right now I'm running Hamm. I'm pretty much a newbie to this. But what
good would it do to upgrade to slink? I had installation problems with
Hamm, like on the rescue disk when it would boot the kernel, it'd
automatically repartition my hard drive. And put 4 bogus partitions on
it that weren't
In an attempt to get the siag office automation suite set up, I have
been partialy upgrading my hamm system to frozen.
I have installed xbase, which warned me that I would need othe packagse
now. I added xter, and xbas-clients, but now my system will not start
Stan Brown wrote:
In an attempt to get the siag office automation suite set up, I have
been partialy upgrading my hamm system to frozen.
I have installed xbase, which warned me that I would need othe
packagse
now. I added xter, and xbas-clients, but now my
Subject: Gnome Not working in Slink upgrade
Date: Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 09:53:32PM -0500
In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just tried a new slink upgrade, again. I must have something wrong
because I can't get gnome to upgrade
Subject: Re: Gnome Not working in Slink upgrade
Date: Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 10:57:45PM -0800
In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have Gnome from slink working. I did an upgrade to 2.2 last night,
however, and that broke Gnome. Since
Just tried a new slink upgrade, again. I must have something wrong
because I can't get gnome to upgrade correctly.
when I run panel or eeyes I get the message:
libgtk-1.1.so.2 cannot open shared object file: no such file or
directory
I do have libgtk-1.1.so.3 libgtk-1.1.so.1 but no libgtk
: Gnome Not working in Slink upgrade
Just tried a new slink upgrade, again. I must have something wrong
because I can't get gnome to upgrade correctly.
when I run panel or eeyes I get the message:
libgtk-1.1.so.2 cannot open shared object file: no such file or
directory
I do have libgtk-1.1.so.3
On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 09:53:32PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just tried a new slink upgrade, again. I must have something wrong
because I can't get gnome to upgrade correctly.
when I run panel or eeyes I get the message:
libgtk-1.1.so.2 cannot open shared object file: no such file
For those of you interested I have written a small howto document on upgrading
to SLINK from HAMM. I still have some minor changes to make to it but it is
still usuable. The only thing I am missing is the exact name of one
package...but the system will tell you what that is anyways so it's no
On: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 16:16:10 +0200 Yosef B writes:
Still trying to install slink.
Somebody on the list suggested that I install hamm and then upgrade to
slink as the 1743 resue disk won't work on my system.
I cannot seem to find any instructions or FAQ to show how to
upgrade to slink
TH == Torsten Hilbrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TH On: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 16:16:10 +0200 Yosef B writes:
Still trying to install slink.
Somebody on the list suggested that I install hamm and then upgrade to
slink as the 1743 resue disk won't work on my system.
I cannot seem to find any
Still trying to install slink.
Somebody on the list suggested that I install hamm and then upgrade to
slink as the 1743 resue disk won't work on my system.
I cannot seem to find any instructions or FAQ to show how to upgrade
to slink from hamm. Maybe I am just looking in the wrong place. Can
.
Later,
Tamas
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 16 Nov 1998 21:21:52 GMT
From: Rene Hojbjerg Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: HELP slink upgrade: netscape: locale `C' not supported
Resent-Date: 16 Nov 1998 22:12:44 -
Resent-From: debian-user
Hi Debian users,
I recently upgrade XWindow to last slink version and
matlab stops to run. The error is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~$ matlab
/usr/local/stow/matlab/bin/lnx86/matlab: can't load library 'libXt.so.6'
What is the problem?
Have a nice day,
*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about X Slink upgrade break matlab
Hi Debian users,
I recently upgrade XWindow to last slink version and
matlab stops to run. The error is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~$ matlab
/usr/local/stow/matlab/bin/lnx86/matlab: can't load library 'libXt.so.6
Jeff Noxon wrote:
Re-install xlib6g and it should work. Now if only I could get Acrobat
working again...
Removing /usr/i486-linuxlibc1/lib/X11/locale (empty dir) and linking it to
/usr/lib/X11/locale instead worked for me. A small glitch in the upgrade
process, I presume.
--
/'`\
hello,
i did just managed to get a working (almost ;) slink distrib, but now netscpae
(not installed through dpkg tho, but the version installed with dpkg has the
same problem) tells me:
/usr/local/netscape/netscape
netscape: locale `C' not supported.
Perhaps the $XNLSPATH environment
Re-install xlib6g and it should work. Now if only I could get Acrobat
working again...
Regards,
Jeff
Greetings,
Has I understand, the X packages in slink are not yet ready for installation.
My question is: it is possible to upgrade to slink without upgrading the X
packages?
Message de Mario Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé le: 07-Nov-98, à: 20:07:26
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
