on Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:33:53PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 12:03:21PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I'm trying out Firefox again, and am dogged by slow performance,
particularly on startup and window/tab operations. The browser lags
On May 28 2005, Jacob S wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:31:00 -0400
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
Indeed. One thing that has puzzled me is that scrolling in
www.macslash.org
is simply *slow* on my system while I am using Debian.
I see it too. Not only that,
On May 28 2005, Jacob S wrote:
Yea, or even compare window managers.
My sistem is quite minimal here. I use fluxbox without any bells and
whistles (I use the Minimal Style, since, as I said, my box is not that
powerful).
--
Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito
On May 28 2005, Marty wrote:
The difference is measurable, not subjective.
I don't even have to measure in my system to see that there's something
wrong: the difference is really drastic here. Slashdot, which you mention
as a similar-looking page, is fast, but I don't think that that's the right
On May 28 2005, Carl Fink wrote:
Suspicion: the version of X you're using isn't as accelerated as Windows
XP's driver. I don't suppose you're about to install X.Org?
I'm using a Matrox G400 here. I suspect that there isn't much to optimize
for this card.
BTW, the version of Windows that I
On May 28 2005, Josh Rehman wrote:
While I do not share this same problem,
Don't you see the problem while scrolling www.macslash.org? What about
scrolling a page with many comments, in flat mode? And what about the same
thing done in slashdot.org? Do you see any difference in speed?
Where is
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 04:07 -0300, Rogrio Brito wrote:
On May 28 2005, Josh Rehman wrote:
While I do not share this same problem,
Don't you see the problem while scrolling www.macslash.org? What about
scrolling a page with many comments, in flat mode? And what about the same
thing done in
On Sunday 29 May 2005 12:30, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
Well, I don't think it is the X only. Take Opera. On Linux it is much
faster than Firefox.
Except that it lacks freedom, the main feature many of us are using Linux for
in the first place. Konqueror is real fast, if you want a Firefox
Rather than a Debian build, have you compared speeds with Mozilla.org's
upstream? I've always run upstream and a few days ago tried Debian's
1.0.4 from Sarge and am noticing Firefox is much more sluggish. But
then, I need to compare it when running IceWM as I'm also playing with
KDE on this box
Rogério Brito writes:
Don't you see the problem while scrolling www.macslash.org?
I don't see it here either. Firefox 1.0.4-1, FVWM 2.4.15-1, XFree86
4.2.1-6, kernel 2.6.4, dual PIII-500 with 384M.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
I wrote:
I don't see it here either. Firefox 1.0.4-1, FVWM 2.4.15-1, XFree86
4.2.1-6, kernel 2.6.4, dual PIII-500 with 384M.
And a Matrox G400.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rogério Brito wrote:
Indeed. One thing that has puzzled me is that scrolling in www.macslash.org
is simply *slow* on my system while I am using Debian.
On the other hand, when I boot Windows 2000 SP4 on this very same machine,
I have no problems with slow scrolling on that site. I wouldn't
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 13:32 +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
On Sunday 29 May 2005 12:30, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
Well, I don't think it is the X only. Take Opera. On Linux it is much
faster than Firefox.
Except that it lacks freedom, the main feature many of us are using Linux for
Of course, I
On May 29 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 04:07 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Don't you see the problem while scrolling www.macslash.org? What about
scrolling a page with many comments, in flat mode? And what about the same
thing done in slashdot.org? Do you see any
On May 29 2005, John Hasler wrote:
Rogério Brito writes:
Don't you see the problem while scrolling www.macslash.org?
I don't see it here either. Firefox 1.0.4-1, FVWM 2.4.15-1, XFree86
4.2.1-6, kernel 2.6.4, dual PIII-500 with 384M.
Hummm, perhaps its the dual thing that is doing the
I'm trying out Firefox again, and am dogged by slow performance,
particularly on startup and window/tab operations. The browser lags
noticeably, a feature it shares with Mozilla and a couple other apps
(most noticably OpenOffice.org). All of them share the characteristic
of opening to an
Karsten M. Self wrote:
- Stock Firefox theme. Numerous extensions loaded. System load is
~0.5.
I've seen performance problems in the past when there were old versions
of extensions loaded (particularly tab preferences). I'd start by trying
a fresh install (or removing all extensions)
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 12:03:21PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I'm trying out Firefox again, and am dogged by slow performance,
particularly on startup and window/tab operations. The browser lags
noticeably, a feature it shares with Mozilla and a couple other apps
(most noticably
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 16:33 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 12:03:21PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I'm trying out Firefox again, and am dogged by slow performance,
particularly on startup and window/tab operations. The browser lags
noticeably, a feature it shares
On Saturday 28 May 2005 21:15, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
On the other hand, the windows versions of Firefox and Thunderbird are
amazingly fast. This is really said ...
Some of the windows ports seem to leave linux versions in the dust due to the
higher number of users and developers on windows,
On May 28 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
On the other hand, the windows versions of Firefox and Thunderbird are
amazingly fast. This is really said ...
Indeed. One thing that has puzzled me is that scrolling in www.macslash.org
is simply *slow* on my system while I am using Debian.
On the other
Rogério Brito wrote:
On May 28 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
On the other hand, the windows versions of Firefox and Thunderbird are
amazingly fast. This is really said ...
Indeed. One thing that has puzzled me is that scrolling in www.macslash.org
is simply *slow* on my system while I am using
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:31:00 -0400
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
On May 28 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
On the other hand, the windows versions of Firefox and Thunderbird
are amazingly fast. This is really said ...
Indeed. One thing that has puzzled me is that
Jacob S wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:31:00 -0400
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
On May 28 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
On the other hand, the windows versions of Firefox and Thunderbird
are amazingly fast. This is really said ...
Indeed. One thing that has puzzled
On Sat, 28 May 2005 20:07:18 -0400
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:31:00 -0400
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
On May 28 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
On the other hand, the windows versions of Firefox and
Thunderbird are
Jacob S wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2005 20:07:18 -0400
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:31:00 -0400
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
On May 28 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
On the other hand, the windows versions of Firefox and
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Marty wrote:
I should note, however, that Konqueror and Mozilla also seem slow on that
page. I tried it with IE on WinXP (did't have Firefox there), on a slower
machine, and it was *much* faster, so maybe X11 is part of the problem.
Suspicion: the
While I do not share this same problem, I think this is an oppurtunity
to learn a little bit about application profiling under Debian,
especially desktop application profiling. When the obvious solutions
fail (such as doing a complete reinstall) I think it would be best to
find out exactly where
Josh Rehman wrote:
While I do not share this same problem, I think this is an oppurtunity to
learn a little bit about application profiling under Debian, especially
desktop application profiling. When the obvious solutions fail (such as
doing a complete reinstall) I think it would be best to
29 matches
Mail list logo
