Re: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, I have seen this with the latest net packages in most version since 1.3.95, I think. Still happens at 1.99.8, but less so than some earlier kernels. I have yet to boot 1.99.10. Hasn't caused my any problems, but YMMV. manoj -- "Bond reflected that good Americ

Re: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Rob Browning
ts transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340) > || > > I never saw this before ! Anything to worry about ? > My netbase is version 2.02-1. We had this on the machines in the lab for a short while. I believe it went

Re: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Peter Tobias
ved, 100% packet loss > > Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340) > || > > I never saw this before ! Anything to worry about ? > My netbase is version 2.02-1. It's a kernel problem. If you just get a few of these messages it's ok. If you get a lot of the

Re: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Austin Donnelly
packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > >Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340) >|| > >I never saw this before ! Anything to worry about ? >My netbase is version 2.02-1. This is a kernel problem, well known about by the kernel developers. The very

Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Gerd Bavendiek
Hi, on a quite recently installed Debian-1.1 box I sometimes encounter the following. koko:/root>>> ping us1by-6 PING us1by-6 (156.53.107.26): 56 data bytes --- us1by-6 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss Socket destroy delayed (r