Re: OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD

1999-06-21 Thread Illo de' Illis
On Sun, Jun 20, 1999 at 11:39:18AM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: People [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PLEASE GIVE-ME OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD Sorry but it seems like you caps lock i broken. OPL3-SAx works almost perfect with the new 2.2.x kernels. Grab a kernel source read the Documentation

Re: OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD

1999-06-20 Thread Peter Makholm
People [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PLEASE GIVE-ME OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD Sorry but it seems like you caps lock i broken. OPL3-SAx works almost perfect with the new 2.2.x kernels. Grab a kernel source read the Documentation/sound/OPL3SAx, compile and be happy. I think you need the isapnp package

OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD

1999-06-18 Thread People
PLEASE GIVE-ME OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD ALL DRIVERS TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] THANK YOU

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread steven walsh
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16, for example I need a config line like: options sb io=0x220

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, steven walsh wrote: On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16, for example I need a

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread steven walsh
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote: The configuration of sound AS A MODULE has changed. It is still valid to compile sound support into the kernel (except possibly for PnP sound cards). Indeed. If you specific PNP support I haven't had any problems, though the default

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread Hamori Andras
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16, for example I need a config line like: options sb io=0x220

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread Ed Cogburn
Bob Nielsen wrote: On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, steven walsh wrote: On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16,

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread Ed Cogburn
Hamori Andras wrote: On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16, for example I need a config line like:

Sound Board

1999-03-22 Thread Petru NOTINGHER
Hello. I'm trying to make an ALS 100 Sound Device to work on a Linux machine. Apparently, the card is recognized as a full-compatible SoundBlaster 16 card at the boot time, and that is what it is. The proc/dma and /proc/interrupts show it, but the /dev/sndstat and the/dev/tkmixer are not

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-22 Thread Petru NOTINGHER
---BeginMessage--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What sound driver are you using? OSS (comes with kernel) or ALSA? I'm using OSS. What's ALSA ? Is that the manufacturer's driver ? Also, do you have sound compiled in, or as module? Kernel version would help too. I tried both, but none worked.

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-22 Thread Ed Cogburn
Petru NOTINGHER wrote: -- Subject: Re: Sound Board Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:44:34 +0100 From: Petru NOTINGHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: LEM /UM 2 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL