Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-17 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:41:38AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: Quoting Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Are the Debian 2.2.20 images absolutely vanilla kernels? So what I'd get from a Debian mirror is identical to what I'd get from

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-16 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:41:38AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: Quoting Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Are the Debian 2.2.20 images absolutely vanilla kernels? So what I'd get from a Debian mirror is identical to what I'd get from www.kernel.org? No, they're not. Well, the 2.4 ones

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-16 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:42:38PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: No, they're not. Well, the 2.4 ones aren't, at least. Debian needs to supply (at least) the patches *somewhere* to comply with the GPL. apt-get source kernel-source-$KVERS should get you

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-14 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20 kernel? kernel-source-2.2.20 if it's still actually in the distribution; it's pretty ancient so it may

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-14 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20 kernel? kernel-source-2.2.20 if it's still actually in the distribution; it's pretty ancient so

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-14 Thread ronin2
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 02:47:41 -0800 Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, I'm surprised that stable's still shipping with 2.2. Christ, folks, it's 2003, let's catch up stable. Second, you can't stop time. And as long as software's in widespread use, it's likely actively developed.

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-14 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:47:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20 kernel? kernel-source-2.2.20 if it's still actually in the distribution; it's pretty

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-14 Thread Brian Nelson
Jeffrey L. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Quoting Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20 kernel? kernel-source-2.2.20 if it's still actually

Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-13 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20 kernel? That's what comes as the default in woody and I want to tweak it. I can find headers, patches (what good are patches w/out source to patch?), ReiserFS and PCMCIA modules, but no source. What gives? Jeffrey

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-13 Thread Seneca
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20 kernel? That's what comes as the default in woody and I want to tweak it. I can find headers, patches (what good are patches w/out source to patch

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isn't apt a good alternative to find that out? web:~# apt-cache search kernel-source freeswan - IPSEC utilities for FreeSWan kernel-patch-2.2-lids - LIDS Kernel Patch kernel-patch-2.4-lids - LIDS Kernel Patch kernel-source-2.2.20 - Linux kernel source for version 2.2.20

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-13 Thread Oliver Fuchs
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20 kernel? That's what comes as the default in woody and I want to tweak it. I can find headers, patches (what good are patches w/out source to patch?), ReiserFS and PCMCIA

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-13 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: isn't apt a good alternative to find that out? Sound very reasonable, but: ~# apt-cache policy kernel-source-2.2.20 kernel-source-2.2.20: Installed: (none) Candidate: (none) Version Table: What mirror(s) are you using? Jeffrey

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-13 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Jeffrey L. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: isn't apt a good alternative to find that out? Sound very reasonable, but: ~# apt-cache policy kernel-source-2.2.20 kernel-source-2.2.20: Installed: (none) Candidate: (none) Version

Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel

2003-03-13 Thread Ernst-Magne Vindal
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 21:25, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: Quoting Jeffrey L. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: isn't apt a good alternative to find that out? Sound very reasonable, but: ~# apt-cache policy kernel-source-2.2.20 kernel