Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)

1999-10-06 Thread David Coe
Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A. M. Varon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could we have a potato mailing lists? That's part of what debian-devel *is* for. Why would we want another list for it? Ben answered on _debian-devel_, but not on _debian-user_; I hope he doesn't mind my posting

Re: Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)

1999-10-06 Thread Art Lemasters
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 05:16:59AM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote: [...] I'm not strongly for or against. I could certainly live with another mailing list, but whatever we do, lets leave debian-devel to the developers. I agree, Ed. ...developers and future developers. :-) Hmmm. A new

Re: Splitting debian-user (was Re: DO NOT UPGRADE TO POTATO...)

1999-10-06 Thread Tom Pfeifer
But if we create _debian-user-unstable_, the _debian-user_ readers would miss (would they care?) the discussions -- some of them interesting -- about changes, and might therefore be less well prepared to handle the upgrade to potato when it becomes stable. So I obviously can't make up my