* Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.27 20:12:15-0500]:
> You don't typically want to cache https pages.
you *can't*!
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at the turn of the century in vienna,
t
Phillip Deackes wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:44:00 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg) wrote:
IE has the tendency to not show the errors that are being
generated by the remote server or by the proxy, but to replace it
with its own error message. You can turn that off somewh
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:02:44 -0500
Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 08:05:05PM +, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> You should contact the opera people and see if they will sponsor your
schoool
> and give you the full version to use. You could offer to distribute
their ad
> ver
On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 08:05:05PM +, Phillip Deackes wrote:
...
> Internet Explorer issue. I installed Opera on a test Win 98 workstation
> and it worked perfectly. I have now taken steps to move over to Opera as
> our browser of choice. The free version does have adverts, but I have
> config
* Phillip Deackes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.05 20:05:05+]:
> OK, thanks everyone who helped me with the problem. It was indeed an
> Internet Explorer issue. I installed Opera on a test Win 98 workstation
> and it worked perfectly. I have now taken steps to move over to Opera as
> our browser
on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 08:05:05PM +, Phillip Deackes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:44:00 + (UTC)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg) wrote:
>
> > IE has the tendency to not show the errors that are being
> > generated by the remote server or by the proxy, bu
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:44:00 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg) wrote:
> IE has the tendency to not show the errors that are being
> generated by the remote server or by the proxy, but to replace it
> with its own error message. You can turn that off somewhere,
> I believe, whic
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Phillip Deackes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 4 Nov 2001 12:06:14 -0800 (PST)
>"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> would be helpful if you gave error messages. i am writing
>> this email from squirrelmail(web email) running on apache-ssl,
>> composing from
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 08:43:05PM +, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> Normally when a url is unavailable I get a Squid error message. When I try
> and access an secure site, I get an IE5 message complaining that there is
> a DNS error and the address cannot be found. I am at home at the moment,
> but
Phillip Deackes said:
> It might be useful if you could email me your squid.conf.
i can't email it ..opera/linux cannot upload files through
https(known bug). and since im writing this from a webmail
app i can't attach files :)
put i'll put it here:
http://portal.aphroland.org/squid.conf
as for
martin f krafft said:
>
> is no way that it can decrypt the stream and cache the data -
> unless something here is entirely broken, or i am failing to
> understand the trivial.
i wouldn't want squid to cache https data. all squid has
to do is allow the connection. from what ive heard from
the dev
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001 12:06:14 -0800 (PST)
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would be helpful if you gave error messages. i am writing
> this email from squirrelmail(web email) running on apache-ssl,
> composing from Opera 5.0/linux running through a squid 2.2.5
> proxy through SSL no problems. i u
here are some links that confirm what i said:
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2817.txt
http://www.web-cache.com/Writings/Internet-Drafts/
draft-luotonen-web-proxy-tunneling-01.txt
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-1.html#ss1.12
*but*: work is in progress:
http://squid.sourceforg
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001 20:33:18 +0100
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [cc'ing to debian-user since this is about the 15th time i am
> answering this question... which i am glad to do, don't get me wrong!]
Sorry - I spent much of Friday and today going through newsgroups
(Debian-User is a
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.04 12:25:37-0800]:
> > squid for SSL? uhm, how?
>
> easy.
>
> acl all src 10.10.10.0/255.255.255.0 166.128.21.107/32
> acl manager proto cache_object
> acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.255
> acl SSL_ports port 443 563
> acl Safe_ports port 80 21 443 563
martin f krafft said:
> * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.04 12:06:14-0800]:
>> would be helpful if you gave error messages. i am writing
>> this email from squirrelmail(web email) running on apache-ssl,
>> composing from Opera 5.0/linux running through a squid 2.2.5
>> proxy through SSL no probl
martin f krafft said:
> * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.04 12:06:14-0800]:
>> would be helpful if you gave error messages. i am writing
>> this email from squirrelmail(web email) running on apache-ssl,
>> composing from Opera 5.0/linux running through a squid 2.2.5
>> proxy through SSL no probl
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.04 12:06:14-0800]:
> would be helpful if you gave error messages. i am writing
> this email from squirrelmail(web email) running on apache-ssl,
> composing from Opera 5.0/linux running through a squid 2.2.5
> proxy through SSL no problems. i use squid everyday on
Phillip Deackes said:
> Trawlling through the news archives it is obviously a lot of people
> are having problems accessing secure web sites using squid. If
> there is no easy solution, would moving to an older version of
> squid help? We are not bothered about features, we just need a way
> of ma
[cc'ing to debian-user since this is about the 15th time i am
answering this question... which i am glad to do, don't get me wrong!]
* Phillip Deackes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.04 19:16:14+]:
> Thanks, Martin. Could you explain a little more, please. I am
> primarily a teacher, so only have
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 06:02:37PM +, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> I have installed Debian on a decent spec machine and installed squid 2.4.
> All our Windows 98 workstations are able to access web pages through the
> squid proxy. The problem we are having is that secure web pages cannot be
> acce
I am posting this message to both the Debian User and Leicester LUG lists,
in the hope that someone can help.
A while ago in the school where I am ICT Coordinator I set up a Linux
machine running Squid in order to help make our paultry 128K Internet
connection work better when 60 machines are usin
22 matches
Mail list logo
