On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:04:19PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
[OT] Have the Wheezy release goals been published? I hope that multi-arch
APT
and wide (%80 of main) package support is one of them.
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/goals.txt
--
Religion is excellent stuff for
http://www.ipcop.org/
http://www.smoothwall.org/
The two are very similar and have the same roots. SmoothWall offers a
commercial version with official paid support. IPCop does not.
Commercial paid support for IPCop comes strictly from 3rd parties. In
your case I'm guessing you don't
On 23.2.2011 3:35, Jason Hsu wrote:
If that doesn't work, I'll do a fresh installation of Lenny on the old
computer, upgrade it to Squeeze, and then set it up as a firewall/server.
I hope you have Lenny full CD disk images available. Net Install does
not work any more.
I just reinstalled a
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:35:19 -0600, Jason Hsu wrote:
(...)
Is there anything wrong with sticking with Debian Lenny?
I hope not. I'm also with lenny and won't upgrade until wheezy :-)
Does Debian shut down support for old versions like Ubuntu does?
Lenny will drop security patches when
On Mi, 23 feb 11, 17:01:41, Camaleón wrote:
Lenny will drop security patches when wheezy comes out
or one year after the release of squeeze, whichever comes first[1]
(effective
Debian support for releases is about 2 years).
By your
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 12:53:39 Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mi, 23 feb 11, 17:01:41, Camaleón wrote:
(effective
Debian support for releases is about 2 years).
By your numbers it's about 4 years (2 years as stable and 2 years as
oldstable), but in fact it's only about 3 years (aprox. 2
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:53:39 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mi, 23 feb 11, 17:01:41, Camaleón wrote:
Lenny will drop security patches when wheezy comes out
or one year after the release of squeeze, whichever comes first[1]
Sure. I hope Wheezy is not released tomorrow :-)
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:33:45 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 12:53:39 Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mi, 23 feb 11, 17:01:41, Camaleón wrote:
(effective
Debian support for releases is about 2 years).
By your numbers it's about 4 years (2 years as stable and 2
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 13:56:54 Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:53:39 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
By your numbers it's about 4 years (2 years as stable and 2 years as
oldstable), but in fact it's only about 3 years (aprox. 2 years as
stable and 1 year as oldstable).
Nope,
Thanks for the help on upgrading from Lenny to Squeeze. It's hard to
understand everything in the release notes, so it will take me some time to
make the transition.
Is there anything wrong with sticking with Debian Lenny? Does Debian shut down
support for old versions like Ubuntu does
Jason Hsu writes:
Is there anything wrong with sticking with Debian Lenny?
No.
Does Debian shut down support for old versions like Ubuntu does?
Support will continue for a couple of years. Look into backports.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
In 20110222193519.538b384f.jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com, Jason Hsu wrote:
Is there anything wrong with sticking with Debian Lenny?
Yes and no. The longer you wait after the Squeeze release the less of the
community will have Lenny and be able to easily answer your questions.
Does Debian shut
down
Jason Hsu put forth on 2/22/2011 7:35 PM:
Thanks for the help on upgrading from Lenny to Squeeze. It's hard to
understand everything in the release notes, so it will take me some time to
make the transition.
Is there anything wrong with sticking with Debian Lenny? Does Debian shut
down
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:30:17 +, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 15:03:35 Camaleón wrote:
So, no more packages for lenny on D-M?
No - and D-M needs to be removed, or at least commented out, from
sources.list.
Wait... why? There are still repos holding the old packages.
What I
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 15:03:35 Camaleón wrote:
So, no more packages for lenny on D-M?
No - and D-M needs to be removed, or at least commented out, from
sources.list.
Or, of course, one can live with the errors that are thrown up every time that
one upgrades.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 20:14:41, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 14:28:34, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20110208174911.GT6759@think.homelan, Andrei Popescu wrote:
you can run
aptitude search
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 20:14:41, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 14:28:34, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20110208174911.GT6759@think.homelan, Andrei Popescu wrote:
you can run
aptitude search
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 20:14:41, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 14:28:34, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In
I have a headless VPS running Lenny. For the time being, until I get
some time to attend to it, I wish to keep it that way. However, my
sources.list points to stable:
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian stable main
Tony van der Hoff:
I have a headless VPS running Lenny. For the time being, until I get
some time to attend to it, I wish to keep it that way. However, my
sources.list points to stable:
Then change that to lenny and run apt-get update. If you didn't
install any packages from squeeze (which
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:27:55AM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
...
What happens in this case? Presumably updates will be taken from the new
stable repository?
Correct.
Should I be specifying lenny instead of stable,
On 08/02/11 11:59, Dave Sherohman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:27:55AM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
...
What happens in this case? Presumably updates will be taken from the new
stable repository?
Correct.
Should
Dave Sherohman wrote:
Should I be specifying lenny instead of stable,
Yes, if you want to stay on lenny until further notice.
Personally, I always use the version names, so I'm not 100% certain that
it's still around, but I believe you could also use old-stable to
continue tracking
Bernard schreef:
Dave Sherohman wrote:
Should I be specifying lenny instead of stable,
...
I feel quite embarrassed in reading this above. I am still on Lenny, and
wishes to remain that way for as long as possible, hopefully until I buy
a new computer.
Don't try for longer than a
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:22:08 +0100, Bernard wrote:
I feel quite embarrassed in reading this above. I am still on Lenny, and
wishes to remain that way for as long as possible, hopefully until I buy
a new computer.
My 'sources.list' has a few calls for 'stable', and some calls for
'lenny'.
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 15:22:08, Bernard wrote:
My 'sources.list' has a few calls for 'stable', and some calls for
'lenny'. How am I to know for sure whether or not I have already
installed packages from Squeeze ? Last package I installed was
'xine-ui' and, not later than 2-3 days ago, I have
In 20110208174911.GT6759@think.homelan, Andrei Popescu wrote:
you can run
aptitude search ~S~i~Astable
to get the list of packages from stable/squeeze.
Depends. The argument of ~A (stable in this case) is used as a regular
expression. That regular expression also matches packages from
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 14:28:34, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20110208174911.GT6759@think.homelan, Andrei Popescu wrote:
you can run
aptitude search ~S~i~Astable
to get the list of packages from stable/squeeze.
Depends. The argument of ~A (stable in this case) is used as a regular
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Ma, 08 feb 11, 14:28:34, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20110208174911.GT6759@think.homelan, Andrei Popescu wrote:
you can run
aptitude search ~S~i~Astable
to get the list of packages from
29 matches
Mail list logo
