I've done it again - twice. I clearly need some dark black coffee to wake me
up. :-(
So sorry, Mark.
On Thursday 09 June 2011 08:07:16 Lisi wrote:
From:
Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com
To:
mark.pa...@gmail.com
Date:
Today 08:07:16
On Thursday 09 June 2011 03:20:32 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done it again - twice. I clearly need some dark black coffee to wake me
up. :-(
So sorry, Mark.
On Thursday 09 June 2011 08:07:16 Lisi wrote:
From:
Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com
To:
mark.pa...@gmail.com
Date:
Today
On Thursday 09 June 2011 09:35:16 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done it again - twice. I clearly need some dark black coffee to
wake me up. :-(
So sorry, Mark.
On Thursday 09 June 2011 08:07:16 Lisi wrote:
From:
Lisi
On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:01:00 Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 09:35:16 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done it again - twice. I clearly need some dark black coffee to
wake me up. :-(
So sorry, Mark.
On Thursday
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:01:00 Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 09:35:16 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done it again - twice. I clearly need some dark black
Putting this back on list where it ought to be.
On Thursday 09 June 2011 12:52:41 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:53:41 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Thursday 09 June 2011 14:21:12 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 12:52:41 Mark Panen wrote:
And at the risk of seeming even more repetitious:
Could you run apt-get update followed by apt-get dist-upgrade and post
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 14:21:12 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 12:52:41 Mark Panen wrote:
And at the risk of seeming even more repetitious:
Just for test purpose, add Wheezy or Sid. Pardon if you already have
tested this?
spinymouse@debian:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
# SQUEEZE
deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
deb
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
Just for test purpose, add Wheezy or Sid. Pardon if you already have
tested this?
spinymouse@debian:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
# SQUEEZE
deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free
deb
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 16:50 +0200, Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
wrote:
Just for test purpose, add Wheezy or Sid. Pardon if you already have
tested this?
spinymouse@debian:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
# SQUEEZE
deb
On Thursday 09 June 2011 15:29:22 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 14:21:12 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 12:52:41 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:55:43 Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 15:29:22 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 14:21:12 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:55:43 Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 15:29:22 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 14:21:12 Mark Panen wrote:
On Thu,
Hi,
You might want to try the following:
- Disabling the CD-ROM as an apt source by commenting them out (add a # sign
before deb cdrom...)
- Changing your mirror to the Debian CDN -
http://cdn.debian.net/debian(that is, replace
http://mirror.kernel.org/debian with http://cdn.debian.net/debian)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:59 AM, titantopp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
You might want to try the following:
- Disabling the CD-ROM as an apt source by commenting them out (add a # sign
before deb cdrom...)
- Changing your mirror to the Debian CDN - http://cdn.debian.net/debian
(that is, replace
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Mark Panen mark.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:59 AM, titantopp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
You might want to try the following:
- Disabling the CD-ROM as an apt source by commenting them out (add a # sign
before deb cdrom...)
- Changing your
Hm in that case, what does aptitude full-upgrade do?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Mark Panen mark.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Mark Panen mark.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:59 AM, titantopp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
You might want to try the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:49 PM, titantopp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm in that case, what does aptitude full-upgrade do?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Mark Panen mark.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Mark Panen mark.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:59 AM,
Mark Paten wrote:
Just installed Debian 6.0.0 and synaptic. The Officially supported
(main) etc on the first tab cannot be checked. They where checked when
i first installed synaptic but after i changed mirrors they will not
be checked.
I still have the correct mirrors in sources list but
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Andrew McGlashan
andrew.mcglas...@affinityvision.com.au wrote:
Mark Paten wrote:
Just installed Debian 6.0.0 and synaptic. The Officially supported
(main) etc on the first tab cannot be checked. They where checked when
i first installed synaptic but after i
Putting back on list, having erroneously taken it off. Sorry Mark. :-(
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 17:59:58 Mark Panen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 14:41:36 Mark Panen wrote:
I don't understand why aptitude update shows 560
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Putting back on list, having erroneously taken it off. Sorry Mark. :-(
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 17:59:58 Mark Panen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 14:41:36
Hi
Just installed Debian 6.0.0 and synaptic. The Officially supported
(main) etc on the first tab cannot be checked. They where checked when
i first installed synaptic but after i changed mirrors they will not
be checked.
I still have the correct mirrors in sources list but cannot update.
--
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 05:06 +0200, Mark Panen wrote:
Hi
Just installed Debian 6.0.0 and synaptic. The Officially supported
(main) etc on the first tab cannot be checked. They where checked when
i first installed synaptic but after i changed mirrors they will not
be checked.
I still have
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 05:06 +0200, Mark Panen wrote:
Hi
Just installed Debian 6.0.0 and synaptic. The Officially supported
(main) etc on the first tab cannot be checked. They where checked when
i first installed
Hi,
Can you paste your /etc/apt/sources.list here?
What does aptitude update; aptitude safe-upgrade give?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Panen mark.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 05:06
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:51 AM, titantopp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can you paste your /etc/apt/sources.list here?
What does aptitude update; aptitude safe-upgrade give?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Panen mark.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ralf Mardorf
28 matches
Mail list logo