On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:16:50AM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> > you refused to recognize that the sub-heading contradicts with the
> > so-called package's description
>
> Yes yes, so file a bug report as recommended.
>
> > three decades younger than you but you don't have to sound
> you refused to recognize that the sub-heading contradicts with the
> so-called package's description
Yes yes, so file a bug report as recommended.
> three decades younger than you but you don't have to sound patronizing or
> condescending.
You started the war.
What's wrong with being old?
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:04:52AM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > > https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
> > >
> > The main heading of that web page is Package: wpasupplicant
> > (2:2.10-12)
> >
> > Immediately below it is the sub-heading that states
>
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:13:01AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
[...]
> Then "fail" seems to be the appropriate word.
[...]
> If all else fails, read the words in front of you.
Folks, please, no need to be snarky.
Everyone of us overlooks something at times; something obvious to
someone may
On Wed, Jan 03 2024 at 06:36:24 PM, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> My Debian distro has a kernel version of 6.1.69-1 and the installed
> wpasupplicant's version for Debian Bookworm is 2:2.10-12.
>
> I don't use Network Manager; instead I rely solely on the ifup and ifdown
> scripts to
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:57 PM Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> >> Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
> >> support. Even the package description says that.
> > Could you provide me the URL to the package description please?
>
> I think it's better to refer to the
>> Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
>> support. Even the package description says that.
> Could you provide me the URL to the package description please?
I think it's better to refer to the actual behavior, since that's the
only thing that matters in the end.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
>
>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:13 AM
> > From: "Bret Busby"
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:40:33 +0100
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have
> > the support. Even the package description says that.
> >
> Could you provide me the URL to the package description please?
You can get the package description of
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:25 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> but, as you ins
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:13 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> Then "fail" s
On 4/1/24 07:20, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:14 AM
From: "Pocket"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you comparin
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:16 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> It is unfortunate t
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:14 AM
> From: "Pocket"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
>
> Are you comparing th
On 4/1/24 07:11, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:57 AM
From: "Bret Busby"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
I do not know w
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:03 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
> On 4/1/24 06:18, to...@tuxte
On 1/3/24 17:57, Bret Busby wrote:
On 4/1/24 05:40, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support
WPA3-Personal authentication. What al
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:04:52AM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
> >
> The main heading of that web page is Package: wpasupplicant (2:2.10-12)
>
> Immediately below it is the sub-heading that states
>
> client support for WPA and WPA2
On 4/1/24 07:04, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Hi Tomas
Thanks for your reply.
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:18 AM
From: to...@tuxteam.de
To: "Stella Ashburne"
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
authentica
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:57 AM
> From: "Bret Busby"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> I do not know whether y
Hi Tomas
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:18 AM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. W
On 4/1/24 06:18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:40:33PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA
On 4/1/24 05:40, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you sure? WPA
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:40:33PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
> > From: "Anssi Saari"
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support
> > WPA3
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
> From: "Anssi Saari"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal
> authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
>
>
> Are you sure? WPA3-
Stella Ashburne writes:
> Unfortunately, the current package wpasupplicant is unable to do
> WPA3-Personal authentication.
Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
support. Even the package description says that.
> What alternatives to it exist?
I don't think
Hi guys
My Debian distro has a kernel version of 6.1.69-1 and the installed
wpasupplicant's version for Debian Bookworm is 2:2.10-12.
I don't use Network Manager; instead I rely solely on the ifup and ifdown
scripts to bring up my network interfaces.
My wireless router in my BFF's residence
27 matches
Mail list logo
