On Saturday 11 October 2003 01:47 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:49:32AM -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
Nice logo...where's the content?
What do you mean?
Ah, Konq 3.2 only shows the logo and a big blank page.
Konq 3.1 does
John Hasler wrote:
Naitik writes:
I was wondering if there's some script/application that can bounce those,
so I can do my part in annoying the spammer.
You won't bother the spammer at all, but you will annoy the hell out of me
and others whose domains the spammers forge.
I know virii usually
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 at 17:36 GMT, ScruLoose penned:
And if you really want to start annoying spammers, go do a google
search on teergrubing. This likewise only applies if you're running
your own mailserver.
Okay, I keep seeing this term, so I finally did look it up.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:33:15AM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
Just to clarify for anyone else reading over this, you're refering to
the 'returning mail post SMTP delivery' definition of bounce and not the
'SMTP time 3-5xx error' definition,
Jacob Anawalt writes:
Just to clarify for anyone else reading over this, you're refering to the
'returning mail post SMTP delivery' definition of bounce and not the
'SMTP time 3-5xx error' definition, right?
The latter is refusing, not bouncing.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:46:01PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
Pretty low to nil. Spammers can't tell a teergrube from a really,
really slow mail server connected by carrier pigeon from northern
Siberia.
See RFC 1149.
Believe it or not, someone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:49:32AM -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
Nice logo...where's the content?
What do you mean?
Ah, Konq 3.2 only shows the logo and a big blank page.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
`. `'` proud
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:49:32AM -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
Nice logo...where's the content?
What do you mean?
Ah, Konq 3.2 only shows the logo and a big blank page.
Well, that's not my doing.
Daniel
--
Daniel
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:47:05AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:46:01PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
Pretty low to nil. Spammers can't tell a teergrube from a really,
really slow mail server connected by carrier pigeon from northern
Siberia.
See RFC 1149.
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:31:08PM -0600, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I wonder what the legal ramifications are, as well as wondering how
likely it would be that teergrubing would result in retaliation that
would saturate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:33:24AM -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2001may/gee20010511005839.htm ?
Nice logo...where's the content?
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:33:24AM -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2001may/gee20010511005839.htm ?
Nice logo...where's the content?
What do you mean? I get a page with an article starting:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:09:24PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:31:08PM -0600, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I wonder what the legal ramifications are, as well as wondering how
likely it would be that teergrubing would result in retaliation that
would saturate my
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:07:55PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:36:17PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote:
Feeding spam into spamcop.org is a good way to contribute to a long-term
solution (generates complaint letters to the
I dump all my spam into one folder (for sa-learn), and I was wondering
if there's some script/application that can bounce those, so I can do my
part in annoying the spammer.
I know virii usually fake their headers, but most real spam I've seen
doesnt, and some even use the bounced mails to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:04:40AM -0400, Naitik Shah wrote:
I dump all my spam into one folder (for sa-learn), and I was wondering
if there's some script/application that can bounce those, so I can do my
part in annoying the spammer.
It doesn't
Naitik writes:
I was wondering if there's some script/application that can bounce those,
so I can do my part in annoying the spammer.
You won't bother the spammer at all, but you will annoy the hell out of me
and others whose domains the spammers forge.
I know virii usually fake their
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:04:40AM -0400, Naitik Shah wrote:
I dump all my spam into one folder (for sa-learn), and I was wondering
if there's some script/application that can bounce those, so I can do my
part in annoying the spammer.
I know virii usually fake their headers, but most real
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 at 17:36 GMT, ScruLoose penned:
And if you really want to start annoying spammers, go do a google
search on teergrubing. This likewise only applies if you're running
your own mailserver.
Okay, I keep seeing this term, so I finally did look it up.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:36:17 -0400,
ScruLoose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:04:40AM -0400, Naitik Shah wrote:
I dump all my spam into one folder (for sa-learn), and I was
wondering if there's some script/application that can bounce those,
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 at 20:01 GMT, Vineet Kumar penned:
Yeah. If you connect to my server, and my server is slow, you have 2
choices: (1) wait it out, or (2) bugger off. I don't see how this is
could possibly be construed as vigilante behavior or have any legal
ramfications. I didn't follow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:36:17PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote:
Feeding spam into spamcop.org is a good way to contribute to a long-term
solution (generates complaint letters to the spammer's ISP, and
submits them to a block-list).
spamcop.net, not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:31:08PM -0600, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I wonder what the legal ramifications are, as well as wondering how
likely it would be that teergrubing would result in retaliation that
would saturate my bandwidth and make my ISP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:07:17PM -0600, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
Sounds good to me, but a lot of things that seem perfectly reasonable to
me have turned up in court recently.
Move outside the US and EU. Only the US and EU put up with that kind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:27:38PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..for spammers in the US, a law shark will do fine, outside, I
recommend turn them in to the Chinese for espionage. ;-)
I do that with the Chinese spammers. Seems to get them quiet
25 matches
Mail list logo
