On Sun 10 Mar 2013 at 15:00:29 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Would it be possible to also pipe outgoing mail through procmail or
similar, on its way to the MTA/SMTP server?
When I initially looked at this I thought maybe, but it did not seem
particularly friendly to do. More to the point, I
On Sun 10 Mar 2013 at 00:37:59 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Cool :)
Thanks for sharing. Appreciated.
+1. I also think that is pretty cool. Since Message-Id is one of the
few that would be passed through. However many clients do not do
this. I have many
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On Sun 10 Mar 2013 at 15:00:29 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Would it be possible to also pipe outgoing mail through procmail or
similar, on its way to the MTA/SMTP server?
When I initially looked at this I thought maybe, but it did not seem
David Guntner wrote:
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
Would it be possible to also pipe outgoing mail through procmail or
similar, on its way to the MTA/SMTP server?
...
There is a Debian package of proxsmtp. This program can proxy mail to a
local or remote MTA. More to the point,
Bob Proulx grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
Would it be possible to also pipe outgoing mail through procmail or
similar, on its way to the MTA/SMTP server?
...
There is a Debian package of proxsmtp. This program can proxy mail to a
local
On Fri 08 Mar 2013 at 23:19:06 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
But I am a pedantic sort and so must say that every message does have
To continue with the pedantry :) and to return to the issue raised in
this subthread, a CC is not a duplicate of a list mail. Put them side by
side and the difference is
On 3/10/13, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Fri 08 Mar 2013 at 23:19:06 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
But I am a pedantic sort and so must say that every message does have
To continue with the pedantry :) and to return to the issue raised in
this subthread, a CC is not a duplicate of a list
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Brian wrote:
Fortunately, Mutt users have the opportunity to take advantage of its
ability to construct a custom Message-ID: header for a mail sent to
debian-user. Like so:
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr Message-ID:'
send-hook 'debian-user@lists\.debian\.org' 'my_hdr
Somehow, I got on the debian help list. Pleas get me (mckitt1...@gmail.com)
off. I think my problems were due to bad sectors on my hard drive. I will
try again when I get a new one. I have the debian 1-8 i386 iso's burned to
dvds.
best of luck
bob
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Bob Proulx
On Friday 08 March 2013 16:40:50 Robert McKittrick wrote:
Somehow, I got on the debian help list. Pleas get me (mckitt1...@gmail.com)
off. I think my problems were due to bad sectors on my hard drive. I will
try again when I get a new one. I have the debian 1-8 i386 iso's burned to
dvds.
We
Lisi Reisz wrote:
In case anyone wishes to point out to Bob that this information is
on the end of every email, it was not at the end of Bob's email, so
give him the benefit of the doubt and spare him - please?
I know what you meant and I agree. Confusingly there are also two
Bobs in that
David Guntner wrote:
Bob Proulx grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
For one I use the mailing list headers List-Id and List-Post. Those
are the standard headers and those are the best ones to use for filing
mailing list messages. Smart MUAs use those to know how to do a
list-reply. Therefore
On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 00:35:35 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
...
# Duplicate Suppression.
:0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
# Take out the Trash.
:0 a:
/dev/null
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 00:35:35 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
...
# Duplicate Suppression.
:0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
# Take out the Trash.
On Sat 02 Mar 2013 at 09:20:14 -0800, David Guntner wrote:
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
Be strict in what you send and generous in what you receive is still a
good maxim to follow.
I agree. And when I'm setting up a mail *server* (which typically
services the needs of multiple
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On Sat 02 Mar 2013 at 09:20:14 -0800, David Guntner wrote:
Brian grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
And face it, the scenario you describe above is not one I (or a number
of other people) are likely to run into all that often. Possible, sure.
Probable, not
On 03/03/13 10:30, David Guntner wrote:
Actually, I am seeking no such thing. What I *am* saying, however, is
that if you (again, in the general sense, not necessarily specifically
you) are going to come at someone with a that solution is no good for
reason X, then it's only polite to
Richard Hector grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 03/03/13 10:30, David Guntner wrote:
I've worked at places where the attitude of management was along the
lines of, If you're going to come to me with a complaint about the way
something is being done, provide a possible solution. Otherwise I
Bob Proulx wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
...
# Duplicate Suppression.
:0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
# Take out the Trash.
:0 a:
/dev/null
For one I use the mailing list headers List-Id
Bob Proulx grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
...
# Duplicate Suppression.
:0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
# Take out the Trash.
:0 a:
/dev/null
That's all there is to
David Guntner wrote:
Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple.
...
# Duplicate Suppression.
:0Whc: $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 8192 $MAILDIR/.msgid.cache
# Take out the Trash.
:0 a:
/dev/null
That's all there is to it. The formail program is used to grab
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
AND PLEASE STOP HITTING REPLY ALL - I DON'T NEED TWO COPIES OF EVERY ONE
OF YOUR POSTINGS - REPLY TO THE LIST, ONLY
If you're using Procmail to filter your E-Mail, I can send you a recipe
that deletes the duplicate when things like that happen...
David Guntner wrote:
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
AND PLEASE STOP HITTING REPLY ALL - I DON'T NEED TWO COPIES OF EVERY ONE
OF YOUR POSTINGS - REPLY TO THE LIST, ONLY
If you're using Procmail to filter your E-Mail, I can send you a recipe
that deletes the duplicate when things
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
AND PLEASE STOP HITTING REPLY ALL - I DON'T NEED TWO COPIES OF EVERY ONE
OF YOUR POSTINGS - REPLY TO THE LIST, ONLY
If you're using Procmail to filter your E-Mail, I can send you a
Hi Miles, hi everybody!
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:56:40 -0500
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Sure... thanks! Still, it's a good thing to train folks to
reply appropriately :-)
Holy ravioli! Training a troll? Gimme a break!
BTW, I'd prefer good old Delete key. I use it a LOT,
David Guntner wrote:
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
David Guntner wrote:
If you're using Procmail to filter your E-Mail, I can send you a recipe
that deletes the duplicate when things like that happen... :-)
Anyway, the recipe is dirt simple. The bit of code below assumes that
Alois Mahdal wrote:
Hi Miles, hi everybody!
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:56:40 -0500
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Sure... thanks! Still, it's a good thing to train folks to
reply appropriately :-)
Holy ravioli! Training a troll? Gimme a break!
BTW, I'd prefer good old Delete
27 matches
Mail list logo
