On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 03:24:11PM +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Victor Munoz vmu...@macul.ciencias.uchile.cl wrote:
Both replicas are very large, and the few listed changes showed no
large files, or so I thought. But it turns out I was wrong, and a 20M
file was involved. I deleted the cache
On Tuesday 26 July 2011 09:28:49 am Victor Munoz wrote:
Fine, thanks for the speculation and the interest.
You're welcome, and good luck!
Randy Kramer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I've reordered some of your comments for my convenience in responding.
On Tuesday 26 July 2011 12:32:18 am Victor Munoz wrote:
Thought you guys who helped me with my original question would like
to know how this evolved.
Thank you!
So I tried rsyncinc another file, 23 M in size (with
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:16:49AM +0300, Johannes Fichtinger wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 06:07:58 Victor Munoz wrote:
Today, I lost the ability to synchronize between two machines, one had
I just wonder, are there any changes on this? If not, should we submit a bug
report in
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 09:10:35PM -0400, Brad Alexander wrote:
I think that I read somewhere that Unison is barely being developed any more
(I'll look for a citation), basically only major bug/security fixes, but no
new features, as I recall. I have been looking for a replacement for it.
Victor Munoz vmu...@macul.ciencias.uchile.cl wrote:
Both replicas are very large, and the few listed changes showed no
large files, or so I thought. But it turns out I was wrong, and a 20M
file was involved. I deleted the cache file, and reconstructed the
mirror, and I finally discovered that
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:25:41AM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
So I tried rsyncinc another file, 23 M in size (with --progress
option), and surprise, it stops when 11% transfer is reached. Tried
with scp, and same magic number: 11% and it stops.
I'm somewhat surprised, because when I was
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 03:24:11PM +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Victor Munoz vmu...@macul.ciencias.uchile.cl wrote:
So I tried rsyncinc another file, 23 M in size (with --progress
option), and surprise, it stops when 11% transfer is reached. Tried
with scp, and same magic number: 11% and it
Hi
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 06:07:58 Victor Munoz wrote:
Today, I lost the ability to synchronize between two machines, one had
I just wonder, are there any changes on this? If not, should we submit a bug
report in Debian?
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Sorry, didn't reply to all...
--b
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: Unison hangs on copy
To: Johannes Fichtinger newslet...@fichtinger.org
I think that I read somewhere that Unison is barely being
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:07:58PM -0400, Victor Munoz wrote:
Today, I lost the ability to synchronize between two machines, one had
lenny until today morning, and the other was sid. I was using
apt-pinning to keep both unison versions compatible.
I few days ago I posted a problem with unison,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:11:40PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
This makes me think that there is a NAT router or other device that is
sometimes losing the virtual circuit between the machines. Starting a
new connection works but the old connection is sometimes idled out?
Usually people run
Victor Munoz wrote:
Mm... not obviouss this is the case. I have a ping to the router
simultaneously with the unison attempt, and while unison is waiting to
copy files, ping keeps responding, no packet loss.
That seems good anyway.
It might be something with the router. Now, I guess ping and
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:21:11AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Ping is an ICMP (internet control message protocol) and rsync and
unison both use TCP. So not different ports but completely different
protocols. Both are part of IP (Internet Protocol).
Got it, not thinking clearly :-) I was
Hi Victor
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2011 schrieb Victor Munoz:
Today, I lost the ability to synchronize between two machines, one had
lenny until today morning, and the other was sid. I was using
apt-pinning to keep both unison versions compatible.
Yesterday night I was able to sync both
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:36:33PM +0200, Johannes Fichtinger wrote:
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2011 schrieb Victor Munoz:
Today, I lost the ability to synchronize between two machines, one had
lenny until today morning, and the other was sid. I was using
apt-pinning to keep both unison
On 07/23/2011 07:36 AM, Johannes Fichtinger wrote:
Hi Victor
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2011 schrieb Victor Munoz:
Today, I lost the ability to synchronize between two machines, one had
lenny until today morning, and the other was sid. I was using
apt-pinning to keep both unison versions
On Saturday 23 July 2011 08:25:10 am Roger Leigh wrote:
I use unison several times a day to sync over 100GiB of data.
I see it stall quite frequently. I think it's a bug in unison,
possibly timing related. I see it only when syncing over the
internet on a DSL connection, not over a LAN.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:36:33PM +0200, Johannes Fichtinger wrote:
Hi Victor
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2011 schrieb Victor Munoz:
Today, I lost the ability to synchronize between two machines, one had
lenny until today morning, and the other was sid. I was using
apt-pinning to keep both
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:25:10PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I use unison several times a day to sync over 100GiB of data.
I see it stall quite frequently. I think it's a bug in unison,
possibly timing related. I see it only when syncing over the
internet on a DSL connection, not over a
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 09:21:22AM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
On Saturday 23 July 2011 08:25:10 am Roger Leigh wrote:
I use unison several times a day to sync over 100GiB of data.
I see it stall quite frequently. I think it's a bug in unison,
possibly timing related. I see it only when
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 09:10:12AM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
In reviewing /var/log/aptitude I notice that the only dependency of
unison-gtk that was upgraded in the past couple of days was libc6
(2.13-7 - 2.13-10), and that was during yesterday's upgrade session
-- just before the
Just noticed that my replies today to this thread went with copy to
the individual posters and the list... Sorry for the duplicate emails.
Victor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Saturday 23 July 2011 11:51:26 am Victor Munoz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 09:21:22AM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
With very large files, it is not surprising to see the link quiet
for periods of time while calculations are being done at each end.
In this case, there are no big files or
Today, I lost the ability to synchronize between two machines, one had
lenny until today morning, and the other was sid. I was using
apt-pinning to keep both unison versions compatible.
Yesterday night I was able to sync both machines for the last time.
Then, today morning, I was not. It connects
Victor Munoz wrote:
I have unison version 2.32.52 in both. So, basically, I don't know
what to do know.
...
Any ideas?
I am using 2.27.57 and have not seen the problem.
Both Sid and Squeeze have unison 2.27.57 available. You might try
downgrading both to 'unison2.27.57' and that seems like
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:51:07PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
I am using 2.27.57 and have not seen the problem.
Both Sid and Squeeze have unison 2.27.57 available. You might try
downgrading both to 'unison2.27.57' and that seems like it should work
just fine, since it has been working. If
Victor Munoz wrote:
... I have noticed today that I suddenly lose the connection between
both machines. (In fact, I'm writing this at home, where the sid
machine is, and connecting via ssh to the squeeze machine, and I've
had to restart this email twice because the terminal hangs.) So
maybe
28 matches
Mail list logo
