Re: Unofficial lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb available (fwd)

1999-02-02 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
paul seelig wrote, > On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Any hope it did not use XForms? > No, not at all unfortunately. Until now there is no other front end > than for XForms and the Qt version is severely outdated. I'd love to > see a gtk+ based front end for LyX but i'm not awa

Re: Unofficial lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb available

1999-02-02 Thread Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
Hi Paul, there is a wish list of Gnome Applications on the Gnome site. Just fill a form with you propost to make a GLyx. :) Have a nice day,Paulo Henrique Quoting Paul Seelig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > An

Re: Unofficial lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb available

1999-02-02 Thread Paul Seelig
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any hope it did not use XForms? > No, not at all unfortunately. Until now there is no other front end than for XForms and the Qt version is severely outdated. I'd love to see a gtk+ based front end for LyX but i'm not aware of anyone having started

Re: Unofficial lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb available

1999-02-02 Thread shaleh
Any hope it did not use XForms?