On 2014-05-03, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> Yeah, OK, I retract the last two paragraphs.
>
Retraction is against list rules; you may, however, attempt to amend
what you have posted previously, or simply beg forgiveness.
--
The ultimate tendency of the technical discussion is a technicality
(or, t
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 12:06:21PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 03 mai 14, 18:25:59, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >
> > > It was an issue for the OP. It's disputable if somebody who can't solve
> > > such an issue on her/his
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Charlie wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2014 02:02:49 -0400 Tom H sent:
>>
>> For x86_32:
>> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
>> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>>
>> For x86_64:
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pi
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 22:56 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>>> On 05/01/2014 02:37 PM, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
At the time, I didn't check to see if the file
/usr/
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 02:02 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> For x86_32:
>> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
>> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>>
>> For x86_64:
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 12:06 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 03 mai 14, 18:25:59, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >
> > > It was an issue for the OP. It's disputable if somebody who can't solve
> > > such an issue on her/his own, sh
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 10:00 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 02 May 2014 21:45:01 Paul E Condon wrote:
> > But, so far, Jessie is functioning no worse than Wheezy
> > for me. Except that I have no sound where I did definitely have sound
> > with Wheezy. Oh well...
>
> I had that happen from Sq
On Sb, 03 mai 14, 18:25:59, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > It was an issue for the OP. It's disputable if somebody who can't solve
> > such an issue on her/his own, should use testing, instead of stable.
>
> The issue is not whether
On Friday 02 May 2014 21:45:01 Paul E Condon wrote:
> But, so far, Jessie is functioning no worse than Wheezy
> for me. Except that I have no sound where I did definitely have sound
> with Wheezy. Oh well...
I had that happen from Squeeze to Wheezy. The "problem" was in the mixer
settings.
Lisi
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 17:19 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> The loaders.cache file was 4573, is that bytes? Whereas the former on
> was 4572 bytes or whatever it is.
ls -l does show bytes ls -hl does convert to better readable values.
One byte more likely is a space-sign more. Perhaps the 4572 bytes were
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 17:25 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> I don't use gnome, my prejudice is that I have never liked it on my
> desktop, but do like some of its apps.
>
> I think gedit is a gnome app, so I maybe that set into the path of
> something like this problem?
Are you sure you still like the cu
On Sat, 3 May 2014 18:25:59 +1200 Chris Bannister sent:
> The issue is not whether one can solve it, but whether one should have
> to. I don't even use GNOME, so shouldn't even see the
> message.
I don't use gnome, my prejudice is that I have never liked it on my
desktop, but do like some of its
On Sat, 3 May 2014 02:02:49 -0400 Tom H sent:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Charlie
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 May 2014 01:12:23 -0400 Tom H sent:
> >
> >> And the message:
> >> Try running the command
> >> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> >> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.ca
On Sat, 3 May 2014 02:02:49 -0400 Tom H sent:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Charlie
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 May 2014 01:12:23 -0400 Tom H sent:
> >
> >> And the message:
> >> Try running the command
> >> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> >> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.ca
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 22:56 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > On 05/01/2014 02:37 PM, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
> >
> > > At the time, I didn't check to see if the file
> > > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 02:02 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Charlie wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 May 2014 01:12:23 -0400 Tom H sent:
> >
> >> And the message:
> >> Try running the command
> >> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> >> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cac
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Charlie wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2014 01:12:23 -0400 Tom H sent:
>
>> And the message:
>> Try running the command
>> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
>> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>> to make things work again for the time being.
>
> That's
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 15:33 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> What fuller path should I have used?
I already pointed out that there are
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=jessie&arch=any&mode=path&searchon=contents&keywords=gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
Among others libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 [i386] and [amd64] h
On Sat, 3 May 2014 01:12:23 -0400 Tom H sent:
> And the message:
> Try running the command
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
> to make things work again for the time being.
That's what I did:
gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders>
/usr/lib/x86_64-li
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Charlie wrote:
>
> I case it hasn't been fixed at the source and you missed it Paul. Ralf
> put it right for me, but my system was more damaged than yours for some
> reason? Probably my system was a little too lean and mean. So I had to
> install:
>
> libgdk-pixbuf2
On Fri, 2 May 2014 14:45:01 -0600 Paul E Condon sent:
> On 20140501_1337-0500, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
> > Chris Bannister, 1.05.2014:
> > >
> > > Did you read my bug report?
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742875
> > >
> > > Was it the same package that caused the messa
On 20140501_1337-0500, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
> Chris Bannister, 1.05.2014:
> >
> > Did you read my bug report?
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742875
> >
> > Was it the same package that caused the messages?
> >
> > Although, I didn't state it explicitly, I thought the m
On Thu, 01 May 2014 22:56:12 -0400 The Wanderer sent:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 05/01/2014 02:37 PM, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
>
> > At the time, I didn't check to see if the file
> > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
> > existed. I als
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 09:35 +0200, filip wrote:
> On Fri, 02 May 2014 09:11:03 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > Alternatively I run su or sudo -i and than continue using commands
> > without sudo.
>
> sudo -s is probably a better than sudo -i, if you want the current
> directory to remain the s
On Fri, 02 May 2014 09:11:03 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Alternatively I run su or sudo -i and than continue using commands
> without sudo.
sudo -s is probably a better than sudo -i, if you want the current
directory to remain the same.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:43 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 21:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > A nice joke, I found this
> >
> > "sudo /usr/bin/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders --update-cache" -
>
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 21:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > A nice joke, I found this
> >
> > "sudo /usr/bin/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders --update-cache" -
> > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1251717#p1251717
> >
> > Does anybody else ad
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 22:56 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 02:37 PM, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
>
> > At the time, I didn't check to see if the file
> > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
> > existed. I also didn't run the command
> > gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/01/2014 02:37 PM, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
> At the time, I didn't check to see if the file
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
> existed. I also didn't run the command
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> /usr/lib/i38
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 21:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> A nice joke, I found this
>
> "sudo /usr/bin/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders --update-cache" -
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1251717#p1251717
>
> Does anybody else add the path to a command located in /usr/bin/ or any
> other comma
A nice joke, I found this
"sudo /usr/bin/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders --update-cache" -
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1251717#p1251717
Does anybody else add the path to a command located in /usr/bin/ or any
other command that _usually_ is mentioned by $PATH?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 20:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 13:37 -0500, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
> > gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>
> The funny thing is, that "gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders" is mentioned without
> a path.
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 13:37 -0500, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
The funny thing is, that "gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders" is mentioned without
a path.
Regarding to
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=jessie&arch
Chris Bannister, 1.05.2014:
>
> Did you read my bug report?
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742875
>
> Was it the same package that caused the messages?
>
> Although, I didn't state it explicitly, I thought the message was a bit
> of a "cop out" like yourself¹. But to top it
On Thu, 1 May 2014 15:23:50 +0300 Andrei POPESCU sent:
> On Jo, 01 mai 14, 22:17:35, Charlie wrote:
> >
> > Chris, because I'm not certain that it was the same package, as the
> > command I was told to run by apt-get was:
> >
> > gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
> > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbu
On Jo, 01 mai 14, 22:17:35, Charlie wrote:
>
> Chris, because I'm not certain that it was the same package, as the
> command I was told to run by apt-get was:
>
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>
> and the one that you posted on the bug
On Thu, 1 May 2014 22:07:57 +1200 Chris Bannister sent:
> Did you read my bug report?
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742875
>
> Was it the same package that caused the messages?
Chris, because I'm not certain that it was the same package, as the
command I was told to run
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:12:08AM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> >
> > I reported Bug#742875 which I noticed on an upgrade. Can you add
> > anything to it?
>
> I thought that if a command should be issued to implement an upgrade,
> it would have been run during that upgrade. eg. Halting cups printing
>
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 10:37 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2014 23:58:04 Charlie wrote:
> > But at the
> > spur of the moment when I thought most were asleep
>
> This list is worldwide. The sun never sets on it. ;-)
>
"debian-user never sleeps :p" - Andrei P.
Btw. some of us
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 23:58:04 Charlie wrote:
> But at the
> spur of the moment when I thought most were asleep
This list is worldwide. The sun never sets on it. ;-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Thu, 1 May 2014 02:33:45 +0300 Andrei POPESCU sent:
> On Jo, 01 mai 14, 08:58:04, Charlie wrote:
> >
> > So you are quite correct, I should have supplied greater detail had
> > I wanted a possible solution in a reply or series of replies. But
> > at the spur of the moment when I thought most w
On Jo, 01 mai 14, 08:58:04, Charlie wrote:
>
> So you are quite correct, I should have supplied greater detail had I
> wanted a possible solution in a reply or series of replies. But at the
> spur of the moment when I thought most were asleep, just required a
> general idea before I hunted further
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:59:13 -0400 Steve Litt sent:
> I view a reinstall like spring cleaning: Get rid of that
> junk you don't need anymore, get rid of the dust bunnies, and end up
> with a bright, clean computer, without the kludges that make the new
> version compatible with the old config fil
On Thu, 1 May 2014 00:27:21 +1200 Chris Bannister sent:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:08:09PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> >
> > Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
> >
> > Updated and upgraded this morning was told to run this:
> >
> > gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
> > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbu
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:22:09 -0700 Robert Holtzman sent:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:24:02PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Ralf Mardorf
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:11:59 +1000 (EST)
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:53:38 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2014 06:53:17 Charlie wrote:
> > Even
> > if it didn't answer my query, whether I should reinstall
>
> How could he or anyone else answer that query without any information?
I'll answer it without any information...
A
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:53:38 +0100 Lisi Reisz sent:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2014 06:53:17 Charlie wrote:
> > Even
> > if it didn't answer my query, whether I should reinstall
>
> How could he or anyone else answer that query without any information?
>
> Lisi
True, that was my fault entirely. I
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 06:53:17 Charlie wrote:
> Even
> if it didn't answer my query, whether I should reinstall
How could he or anyone else answer that query without any information?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:24:02PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Ralf Mardorf
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:11:59 +1000 (EST)
> Subject: Re: Upgrade debacle
>
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 06:10 +
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:08:09PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
>
> Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
>
> Updated and upgraded this morning was told to run this:
>
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>
> It didn't do anything of course and when
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:27:20 +0200 Jochen Spieker sent:
> Charlie:
> >
> > Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
> >
> > Updated and upgraded this morning was told to run this:
> >
> > gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders
> > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
> >
> > It didn't do
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:26:24 +0200 Ralf Mardorf sent:
> Perhaps, just perhaps
>
> sudo apt-get install libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev
> sudo gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders --update-cache
>
> might help?
That did the trick Ralf. I did the first and then ran the second
command, rebooted and it's all good.
Thank
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:10:17 +0200 Ralf Mardorf sent:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:00 +1000, Charlie wrote not what issues he
> experience.
>
> What are the problems you get? Are you sure they're related to
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders? And if so, why do you think the issues are
> related to it?
>
>
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 06:55 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:40 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Ralf Mardorf
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:26:24 +1000 (EST)
>
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:40 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Ralf Mardorf
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:26:24 +1000 (EST)
> Subject: Re: Upgrade debacle
>
> Perhaps, just perhaps
>
> sudo apt-get i
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:19:39 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: Upgrade debacle
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:00 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> 3. After reboot, I'm on solar power so cannot leave the lappy running
&
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:26:24 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: Upgrade debacle
Perhaps, just perhaps
sudo apt-get install libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev
sudo gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders --update-cache
might help?
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:56:03 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: Upgrade debacle
Hi Charlie!
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:08 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
You're using this kernel,
Perhaps, just perhaps
sudo apt-get install libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev
sudo gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders --update-cache
might help?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debia
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:11:59 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: Upgrade debacle
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 06:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:00 +1000, Charlie wrote not what issues
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:00 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> 3. After reboot, I'm on solar power so cannot leave the lappy running
> even in hibernation, my icons vanish, many red crosses, and some of
> the applications like claws mail don't work and all manner of things
> are haywire.
E.g. "claws mail don
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 06:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:00 +1000, Charlie wrote not what issues he
> experience.
> > command not found
>
> https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents
> https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=gdk-pixbuf-qu
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:00 +1000, Charlie wrote not what issues he
experience.
What are the problems you get? Are you sure they're related to
gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders? And if so, why do you think the issues are
related to it?
> command not found
https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_co
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Spieker
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:27:20 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: Upgrade debacle
Charlie:
>
> Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
>
> Updated and upgraded this morning was told to run this:
>
>
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 05:56 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Charlie!
>
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:08 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> > Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
>
> You're using this kernel, but what version of Debian do you use?
Oops, testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@
Hi Charlie!
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:08 +1000, Charlie wrote:
> Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
You're using this kernel, but what version of Debian do you use?
> Updated and upgraded this morning was told to run this:
>
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0
Charlie:
>
> Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
>
> Updated and upgraded this morning was told to run this:
>
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>
> It didn't do anything of course and when I rebooted, found the system is
> severely bro
Using Debian testing 3.12-1-amd64
Updated and upgraded this morning was told to run this:
gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
It didn't do anything of course and when I rebooted, found the system is
severely broken.
I assume I have to rein
68 matches
Mail list logo
