Urs Thuermann:
I see that some new versions of packages are installed without
the old versions being removed, although they are marked as
automatically installed, e.g. Linux kernel, clang, llvm, and
some others. For example
# aptitud
On 9/7/17, Ben Finney wrote:
> Urs Thuermann writes:
>
>> I see that some new versions of packages are installed without the old
>> versions being removed, although they are marked as automatically
>> installed, e.g. Linux kernel, clang, llvm, and some others. For
>> example
>>
>> # aptitude s
Urs Thuermann writes:
> I see that some new versions of packages are installed without the old
> versions being removed, although they are marked as automatically
> installed, e.g. Linux kernel, clang, llvm, and some others. For
> example
>
> # aptitude search "~i clang"
> i clang
On 2017-09-07 17:07 +0200, Urs Thuermann wrote:
> After fully updating my jessie system using
>
> aptitude update; aptitude full-upgrade
>
> I edited sources.list to dist-upgrade to strech. A folloing aptitude
> upgrade wants to install additional 1.5 GB on my system which is
> currently
Dejan Jocic writes:
> Can you check what happens if you use apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
> followed by apt-get dist-upgrade? Aptitude is not really best tool for
> upgrades between distribution releases.
I changed to aptitude quite some time ago, because it seems to better
remove unused aut
On 07-09-17, Urs Thuermann wrote:
> After fully updating my jessie system using
>
> aptitude update; aptitude full-upgrade
>
> I edited sources.list to dist-upgrade to strech. A folloing aptitude
> upgrade wants to install additional 1.5 GB on my system which is
> currently ~5 GB, i.e. a
After fully updating my jessie system using
aptitude update; aptitude full-upgrade
I edited sources.list to dist-upgrade to strech. A folloing aptitude
upgrade wants to install additional 1.5 GB on my system which is
currently ~5 GB, i.e. a 30% increase:
# df -h / /usr
Filesystem
7 matches
Mail list logo
