Re: Vim 5.0 package and compile-time options in packages

1998-03-23 Thread David Sewell
On Mon, Mar 23, 1998 at 02:33:36PM -0500, Scott McDermott wrote: > David Sewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, Mar 23, 1998 at 11:43:49AM -0700: > > A Debian package of 5.0 has just been released, something a lot of > > users were eagerly waiting for. Earlier today I installed it, and > > was disappoi

Re: Vim 5.0 package and compile-time options in packages

1998-03-23 Thread Scott McDermott
David Sewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, Mar 23, 1998 at 11:43:49AM -0700: > A Debian package of 5.0 has just been released, something a lot of > users were eagerly waiting for. Earlier today I installed it, and > was disappointed to discover that GUI support was not enabled, as it > had been in th

Vim 5.0 package and compile-time options in packages

1998-03-23 Thread David Sewell
bug report, but then reflected: VIM 5.0 is a program with so many different compile options (including +/- support for emacs tags and Perl and Python syntax) that it is not easy to build a Debian package that meets the needs of all users. Some people want all the GUI and syntax support; others, especia

Re: VIM 5.0

1998-03-14 Thread David Sewell
On Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 06:53:53PM -0500, Scott McDermott wrote: > Martin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 12:30:35PM -0600: > > Are there plans to include VIM 5.0 in the release version of hamm? It has > > been released for a while, but I haven&#x

Re: VIM 5.0

1998-03-14 Thread Adam Klein
On Fri, Mar 13, 1998 at 11:09:08AM -0700, David Sewell wrote: > On Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 06:53:53PM -0500, Scott McDermott wrote: > > Martin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 12:30:35PM -0600: > > > Are there plans to include VIM 5.0 in the release

Re: VIM 5.0

1998-03-08 Thread Frank Barknecht
Scott McDermott hat gesagt: // Scott McDermott wrote: > Martin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 12:30:35PM -0600: > > Are there plans to include VIM 5.0 in the release version of hamm? It has > > been released for a while, but I haven't seen it in th

Re: VIM 5.0

1998-03-08 Thread Adam Klein
On Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 06:53:53PM -0500, Scott McDermott wrote: > Martin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 12:30:35PM -0600: > > Are there plans to include VIM 5.0 in the release version of hamm? It has > > been released for a while, but I haven&#x

Re: VIM 5.0

1998-03-08 Thread Scott McDermott
Martin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 12:30:35PM -0600: > Are there plans to include VIM 5.0 in the release version of hamm? It has > been released for a while, but I haven't seen it in the update > announcements. Does it currently have a maintainer? It

XFree86 3.2.2 (was: Re: VIM 5.0)

1998-03-07 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, Martin Jackson wrote: > Are there plans to include VIM 5.0 in the release version of hamm? It has > been released for a while, but I haven't seen it in the update > announcements. Does it currently have a maintainer? A question related to this: Will XF

VIM 5.0

1998-03-07 Thread Martin Jackson
Are there plans to include VIM 5.0 in the release version of hamm? It has been released for a while, but I haven't seen it in the update announcements. Does it currently have a maintainer? Martin Jackson: [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Information Science