On Feb 1, 2011 10:37 AM, "T o n g" wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone who replied.
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:43:46 -0500, shawn wilson wrote:
>
> > benchmarks cost too much time and money to do right and someone always
> > wants to argue with them. . .
>
> I know it's against vmware licensing policy to p
Dne, 30. 01. 2011 21:15:49 je T o n g napisal(a):
Hi,
Talking about VM, some prefer virtulbox, some VMWare. Don't know how
many
of you prefer kvm. I'm wondering if you could do the speed benchmark
of
your preferred VM, and compare the result to that of your host.
The reason that I'm asking
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:15 PM, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Talking about VM, some prefer virtulbox, some VMWare. Don't know how many
> of you prefer kvm. I'm wondering if you could do the speed benchmark of
> your preferred VM, and compare the result to that of your host.
>
> per vmware benches, a
On 30/01/11 20:15, T o n g wrote:
> I'm wondering if you could do the speed benchmark of
> your preferred VM, and compare the result to that of your host.
>
Inside a VirtualBox guest, running Debian Lenny, using a IDE based hard
disk file (in the VM profile):
Timing buffered disk reads: 62 MB
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:45, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Talking about VM, some prefer virtulbox, some VMWare. Don't know how many
> of you prefer kvm. I'm wondering if you could do the speed benchmark of
> your preferred VM, and compare the result to that of your host.
>
> The reason that I'm ask
Hi,
Talking about VM, some prefer virtulbox, some VMWare. Don't know how many
of you prefer kvm. I'm wondering if you could do the speed benchmark of
your preferred VM, and compare the result to that of your host.
The reason that I'm asking -- recently I noticed that my kvm is extremely
slow,
6 matches
Mail list logo
