Hallo,
I have a CnMbook netbook and from what I can find it has a Debian Linux
system (distribution, I think it is called).
How do I find out which version of operating system I have? Please.
Thanks,
Cliff Ayling
===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:18:31 +0100, Cliff Ayling wrote:
I have a CnMbook netbook and from what I can find it has a Debian Linux
system (distribution, I think it is called).
How do I find out which version of operating system I have? Please.
As it seems to run a modified version of Debian,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Cliff Ayling
cliffayl...@btinternet.com wrote:
How do I find out which version of operating system I have? Please.
cat /etc/issue /proc/version
Tao
--
http://huangtao.me/
http://www.google.com/profiles/UniIsland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:18:31PM +0100, Cliff Ayling wrote:
Hallo,
I have a CnMbook netbook and from what I can find it has a Debian
Linux system (distribution, I think it is called).
How do I find out which version of operating system I have? Please.
$ lsb_release -a
--
Regards,
On 06/21/2010 06:50 AM, Huang, Tao wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Cliff Ayling
cliffayl...@btinternet.com wrote:
How do I find out which version of operating system I have? Please.
cat /etc/issue /proc/version
And /etc/debian_version.
--
Seek truth from facts.
--
To
On 6/21/2010 5:18 AM, Cliff Ayling wrote:
I have a CnMbook netbook and from what I can find it has a Debian Linux
system (distribution, I think it is called).
How do I find out which version of operating system I have? Please.
dpkg -l base-files
--
. O . O . O . . O O . . . O .
. .
On a laptop that has 4GB of RAM, and an Intel Core 2 Duo processor(which
I assume to be a 64 bit CPU), I understand that a 64-bit OS is best for
accessing the full GB of RAM.
For 64-bit version, Ubuntu has only the AMD64 version.
On the Debian web page at
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Bret Busby b...@busby.net wrote:
On a laptop that has 4GB of RAM, and an Intel Core 2 Duo processor(which I
assume to be a 64 bit CPU), I understand that a 64-bit OS is best for
accessing the full GB of RAM.
For 64-bit version, Ubuntu has only the AMD64
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 01:19:15AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
So, is the AMD64 ISO image, the appropriate one for a laptop with an
Intel Core 2 Duo processor, or is the Intel IA-64 the appropriate image
(and, if so, does it work?) ?
Yes, and yes. amd64 is used because AMD processors were the
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Bret Busby b...@busby.net wrote:
For 64-bit version, Ubuntu has only the AMD64 version.
Which is all you need.
On the Debian web page at http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ , the
architectures supported, include AMD64 and Intel IA-64.
Debian supports
Bret Busby wrote:
On a laptop that has 4GB of RAM, and an Intel Core 2 Duo processor(which
I assume to be a 64 bit CPU), I understand that a 64-bit OS is best for
accessing the full GB of RAM.
For 64-bit version, Ubuntu has only the AMD64 version.
On the Debian web page at
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:54:21 + (UTC)
Gregg Jansen van Vuren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
basically what version of debian will suit my setup, foxconn
motherboard, and intel pentium 4 processor,
i386 would be suitable.
[i386 http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/i386/iso-cd/]
Mark
--
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:28:26AM -0800, John Floren wrote:
So, I should just use the new release? Remember, my computer is really
slow, I could only download with a 56K modem, and I can't download
directly to the intended computer. Also, exactly how large is the
I downloaded a net install
Hello
I am looking at installing Debian on my old 33Mhz 486 w/ 16MB of RAM,
and I am wondering which release to use. I want one that is featureful
but won't be too slow on my machine. I plan on downloading CD images on
another computer then installing them on the old computer. Any tips
would
hiya,
i'd recommend just starting with stable. one release will probably
not be horribly faster or slower than any other release, but in either
case you won't want to be running X. the really nice thing about debian
is that you can configure it to have only what you want right from the
install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i'd recommend just starting with stable. one release will probably
not be horribly faster or slower than any other release, but in
(...)
about debian is that you can configure it to have only what you want
I've got a small problem with that : my
hiya,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:53:38PM +0100, Christophe Courtois wrote:
I've got a small problem with that : my P75 takes time when using
dselect or apt-get ; it seems to have too many package dependencies to
deal with. It's painful but usable on my P75, I wonder what it would be
like
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:53:38PM +0100, Christophe Courtois wrote:
I've got a small problem with that : my P75 takes time when using
dselect or apt-get ; it seems to have too many package dependencies to
deal with. It's painful but usable on my P75, I wonder what it would be
like on a
So, I should just use the new release? Remember, my computer is really
slow, I could only download with a 56K modem, and I can't download
directly to the intended computer. Also, exactly how large is the
current release? I don't want to spend _too_ long downloading it :-)
Thanks,
From a
Le Dimanche 17 Novembre 2002 19:00, sean finney a déclamé :
I've got a small problem with that : my P75 takes time when using
dselect or apt-get ; it seems to have too many package dependencies
oh yeah, i'm not arguing that it's not dog-slow, but how much longer
would it take to download
hiya,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:28:26AM -0800, John Floren wrote:
So, I should just use the new release? Remember, my computer is really
slow, I could only download with a 56K modem, and I can't download
directly to the intended computer. Also, exactly how large is the
current release? I
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 10:46, sean finney wrote:
hiya,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:28:26AM -0800, John Floren wrote:
So, I should just use the new release? Remember, my computer is really
slow, I could only download with a 56K modem, and I can't download
directly to the intended computer.
You seem to miss the point, or so I understand it. I want to
download the distribution on a DIFFERENT computer, burn a
If you have only a 56k modem, you should better buy the CDs. I don't
know where you live, but for example Ikarios.com sells them for almost
nothing (10¤) from France.
--
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 09:34:32AM -0800, John Floren wrote:
I am looking at installing Debian on my old 33Mhz 486 w/ 16MB of RAM,
and I am wondering which release to use. I want one that is featureful
but won't be too slow on my machine. I plan on downloading CD images on
another computer
Hi John
On Sunday 17 November 2002 10:57 am, John Floren wrote:
[snip]
You seem to miss the point, or so I understand it. I want to download
the distribution on a DIFFERENT computer, burn a installation CD,
http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/
Explains how to build ISO images for the
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:28:26AM -0800, John Floren wrote:
So, I should just use the new release? Remember, my computer is really
slow, I could only download with a 56K modem, and I can't download
directly to the intended computer. Also, exactly how large is the
current release? I
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 12:59, Christophe Courtois wrote:
You seem to miss the point, or so I understand it. I want to
download the distribution on a DIFFERENT computer, burn a
If you have only a 56k modem, you should better buy the CDs. I don't
know where you live, but for example
27 matches
Mail list logo
