Kelly Clowers írta:
On 8/20/07, Masatran, R. Deepak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it that Etch incremented the major version number (3.1 to 4.0), but
Lenny will increment only the minor version number (4.0 to 4.1)?
Etch had a lot of major changes. Sarge had kernel 2.4 or 2.6, Etch
had just
Masatran, R. Deepak wrote:
Why is it that Etch incremented the major version number (3.1 to 4.0), but
Lenny will increment only the minor version number (4.0 to 4.1)?
The major and minor version numbers are completely arbitrary. It is up
to the release manager to decide what those numbers are.
Masatran, R. Deepak wrote:
Why is it that Etch incremented the major version number (3.1 to 4.0), but
Lenny will increment only the minor version number (4.0 to 4.1)?
If you know that lenny will be 4.1, then you know more than I do. :-)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Why is it that Etch incremented the major version number (3.1 to 4.0), but
Lenny will increment only the minor version number (4.0 to 4.1)?
--
Masatran, R. Deepak http://research.iiit.ac.in/~masatran/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 8/20/07, Masatran, R. Deepak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it that Etch incremented the major version number (3.1 to 4.0), but
Lenny will increment only the minor version number (4.0 to 4.1)?
Etch had a lot of major changes. Sarge had kernel 2.4 or 2.6, Etch
had just 2.6. Sarge had Xfree86
5 matches
Mail list logo
