On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:05:27 +
Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:45:03PM +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Section 1.2 of the CVS manual is very enlighting:
1.2 What is CVS not?
CVS can do a lot of things for you, but it does not try to be
Tzafrir Cohen said...
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello,
I am preparing a versioning control. In my environment some of the
clients are Windows PC. I have implemented the next Subversion +
TortoiseSVN (for windows clients) + Eventum (for bug
Hi, Adrian:
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 10:22:00 Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello,
I am preparing a versioning control. In my environment some of the
clients are Windows PC. I have implemented the next Subversion +
TortoiseSVN (for windows clients) + Eventum (for bug control, etc.). All
work very
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:45:03PM +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Section 1.2 of the CVS manual is very enlighting:
1.2 What is CVS not?
CVS can do a lot of things for you, but it does not try to be everything for
everyone.
SVN is a better CVS. It works at the project level rather than
Hello,
I am preparing a versioning control. In my environment some of the
clients are Windows PC. I have implemented the next Subversion +
TortoiseSVN (for windows clients) + Eventum (for bug control, etc.). All
work very well but I have a problem that I think it won't be resolved
with any
Adrian Chapela:
Now the copy on the repo is bad, because the User1 is using a function
which isn't on the file3 commited by the User2. Is there any way to
advice User1 that some other files are changed by another user ?
Apart from commit messages by mail: no.
Probably the best approach
On Wednesday, 15.04.2009 at 10:22 +0200, Adrian Chapela wrote:
Do you have any idea to solve this ?
Make sure that User1 and User2 talk to each other. This is a serious
suggestion: version control of this type is not a replacement for
communication.
Having said that, you could look into the
operations (e.g. a clean compile, for example) before allowing the
commit to take place.
Pre-compile or post-compile is not a good option to versioning control
of a web writed in ASP or PHP. This is the real problem. A web will be
big enough to think in problems ;) Many files, many parts, many
Adrian Chapela said...
Hello,
I am preparing a versioning control. In my environment some of the
clients are Windows PC. I have implemented the next Subversion +
TortoiseSVN (for windows clients) + Eventum (for bug control, etc.). All
work very well but I have a problem that I think
In 49e5a888.6000...@gmail.com, Adrian Chapela wrote:
Dave Ewart escribió:
- Pre-commit tests which can be configured to perform arbitrary
operations (e.g. a clean compile, for example) before allowing the
commit to take place.
Pre-compile or post-compile is not a good option to versioning
In 49e59928.7000...@gmail.com, Adrian Chapela wrote:
I am preparing a versioning control. In my environment some of the
clients are Windows PC. I have implemented the next Subversion +
TortoiseSVN (for windows clients) + Eventum (for bug control, etc.). All
work very well but I have a problem
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:22:00 +0200
Adrian Chapela achapela.rexist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am preparing a versioning control. In my environment some of the
clients are Windows PC. I have implemented the next Subversion +
TortoiseSVN (for windows clients) + Eventum (for bug control
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello,
I am preparing a versioning control. In my environment some of the
clients are Windows PC. I have implemented the next Subversion +
TortoiseSVN (for windows clients) + Eventum (for bug control, etc.).
If you have
13 matches
Mail list logo
