Rob Owens wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
if xrandr --query | grep -q HDMI2; then
xrandr --auto --output HDMI2 --right-of HDMI1
fi
Bob, have you tried this with two separate video cards?
Nope. Mine are all on two output video cards. Oh well.
Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital
do that with separate video cards, though.
-Rob
..well, play with the GUI menus, e.g. KDE's System Settings -
Display and Monitor - Multiple Monitors or Gnome's (AFAIR)
System - Preferences - Display and Monitor etc as you
fool around with the plug-'n-play things 'n see what happens. ;o
not
sure if I can do that with separate video cards, though.
In Squeeze the support for dual monitors changed. It is no longer in
the configuration file, although it can be optionally placed there.
Now multiple monitor a userland operation using the xrandr interface.
This is nice actually
but I can't, for instance, drag an application from one screen to
the other. I'm not sure if I can do that with separate video
cards, though.
-Rob
..well, play with the GUI menus, e.g. KDE's System Settings -
Display and Monitor - Multiple Monitors or Gnome's (AFAIR)
System
Rob Owens wrote:
Actually, I now need to figure out how to make the two screens act as
one. Currently, I can open applications on either screen but I can't,
for instance, drag an application from one screen to the other. I'm not
sure if I can do that with separate video cards, though
:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards
on a Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or
is there a simple gui tool to do this nowadays?
Wow, I got it working already. All I did was:
/etc/init.d/gdm3 stop
I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or is there a
simple gui tool to do this nowadays?
Thanks
-Rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or is there a
simple gui tool to do this nowadays?
Wow, I got it working already. All I did was:
/etc/init.d
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:18 -0400, Rob wrote in message
20120424223418.ga5...@aurora.owens.net:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 02:40:08AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:18 -0400, Rob wrote in message
20120424223418.ga5...@aurora.owens.net:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:39:16 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:32:43 -0400 (EDT), Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-04-24 22:19 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote:
...
The same bug can be reproduced by using the following kernel boot parameter:
video=VGA-1:1024x768@87i
...
On 2011-04-24 15:19:05 Stephen Powell wrote:
Don't file bugs upstream
If you file a bug in Debian, don't send a copy to the upstream software
maintainers yourself, as it is possible that the bug exists only in
Debian. If necessary, the maintainer of the package will forward the bug
On Du, 24 apr 11, 16:19:05, Stephen Powell wrote:
But that brings up another issue, which is reporting bugs upstream.
The official Debian policy is Don't report bugs upstream. I quote from
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting:
Don't file bugs upstream
If you file a bug in Debian,
On 2011-04-24 22:19 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote:
Actually, now that I think about it, this bug report has probably been
sitting on the wrong queue all this time. I reported the bug against
package xserver-xorg-video-nouveau, which is a user-space X driver. But
the driver uses kernel mode
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:32:43 -0400 (EDT), Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-04-24 22:19 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote:
...
The same bug can be reproduced by using the following kernel boot parameter:
video=VGA-1:1024x768@87i
...
Please add these findings to the bug report.
I will. But I
On 2011-04-24 00:14 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
There may have been DSFG-freeness concerns about the code as well, but they
were not the primary motivator for removing the package from testing.
They were. Bug #383465¹ had been ignored for three releases already
which is really too
On Sb, 23 apr 11, 17:57:07, Stephen Powell wrote:
I can't use the nouveau driver because the nouveau driver doesn't work
with interlaced video modes. I filed a bug report a good while ago. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589452
No response.
You could try to
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 04:34:13 -0400 (EDT), Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:57:07 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
I can't use the nouveau driver because the nouveau driver doesn't work
with interlaced video modes. I filed a bug report a good while ago. See
I thought this would probably happen eventually. And it did.
I use an Nvidia video card with a RIVA TNT2 chipset. My CRT monitor,
an IBM G51, has a maximum pixel clock rate of 70 MHz. In order
to get 1024x768 resolution out of this monitor I must use an
interlaced video mode. (There is a
In 1636648964.128495.1303595827920.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com,
Stephen Powell wrote:
I really don't see why nv had to be dropped from the distribution.
It is no longer maintained. NVidia abandoned it a while ago. It was still
maintained by the X.org developers for a while. However,
On 04/23/2011 04:57 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
I thought this would probably happen eventually. And it did.
I use an Nvidia video card with a RIVA TNT2 chipset. My CRT monitor,
an IBM G51, has a maximum pixel clock rate of 70 MHz. In order
to get 1024x768 resolution out of this monitor I must
On 04/23/2011 05:14 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In1636648964.128495.1303595827920.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com,
Stephen Powell wrote:
I really don't see why nv had to be dropped from the distribution.
It is no longer maintained. NVidia abandoned it a while ago. It was still
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:14:39 -0400 (EDT), Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
I really don't see why nv had to be dropped from the distribution.
It is no longer maintained. NVidia abandoned it a while ago. It was still
maintained by the X.org developers for a while.
In 4db35418.50...@cox.net, Ron Johnson wrote:
But OP is correct that nv *works*. *Everywhere*.
I didn't claim otherwise. It also doesn't change the fact that it is not
currently maintained. If you'd like it maintained, I suggest you chip in
resources, possibly pooling them with other
On 03/22/2011 05:00 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
on 19:05 Mon 21 Mar, Ron Johnson (ron.l.john...@cox.net) wrote:
Sid (up-to-date)
xfce
nvidia driver 260.19.44-1
After switching an old 7300 card for a GeForce 210 (both are
fanless), I see that the WM has changed behavior in various odd but
on 19:05 Mon 21 Mar, Ron Johnson (ron.l.john...@cox.net) wrote:
Sid (up-to-date)
xfce
nvidia driver 260.19.44-1
After switching an old 7300 card for a GeForce 210 (both are
fanless), I see that the WM has changed behavior in various odd but
tolerable manners.
These WM items are now
Sid (up-to-date)
xfce
nvidia driver 260.19.44-1
After switching an old 7300 card for a GeForce 210 (both are
fanless), I see that the WM has changed behavior in various odd but
tolerable manners.
These WM items are now white instead of following the theme:
1. Drop-down menu bg color
2.
) is 132x50
268 (010Ch) is 132x60.
Actually, what I meant was the text-mode resolutions supported by
specific video cards. That is, information usable to choose which
card to get. My old card did 132x60. My new card did 132x44. In
case I buy a new card, I want to know which modes a given card
-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Here is a list of modes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions#Linux_video_mode_numbers
I think any card that supports VESA probably has to support
1280x1024 and 24 bits (see the table higher
Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, I'd like to be able to know what text mode a card supports
the next time I buy a video card in case I don't want to use
framebuffer mode.
Find a machine with that card, boot from a live CD, give it vga=ask
for a kernel boot parm, and test. I believe
Kevin,
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:46:53PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Relatedly, are they any good tutorials on switching from using
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Here is a list of modes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
Daniel B.:
Kevin,
And setting vga=771 or similar in your kernel options?
Yes. I've been using vga=10 in my kernel options (via LILO) to set
the virtual console text mode resolution at boot time.
I am not absolutely sure, but I don't think vga=10 gives you a real
framebuffer. It just
On Nov 12, 2007 7:24 AM, Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Here
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Daniel B.:
Kevin,
And setting vga=771 or similar in your kernel options?
Yes. I've been using vga=10 in my kernel options (via LILO) to set
the virtual console text mode resolution at boot time.
I am not absolutely sure, but I don't think vga=10 gives you a real
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 7:24 AM, Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Relatedly, are they any good tutorials on switching from using
hardware text-mode for non-X virtual consoles to using ... um ...
whatever the name
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:46:53PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Relatedly, are they any good tutorials on switching from using
hardware text-mode for non-X
On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Here is a list of modes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions
. I'd prefer to fix the problem since I'd have to wait sometime
before getting the new video card and I'd have 2 spare video
cards around.
*** 2) Downgrade to xorg 7.0 since this setup was working before
I would not like to to this, but it's an option. My dual setup worked
out
*** 2) Downgrade to xorg 7.0 since this setup was working before
I would not like to to this, but it's an option. My dual setup worked
out of the box in a previous xorg version. I wonder how I could use
an older xorg in Debian sid.
Ok. A few hours and I got it. Let's reply
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 17:01 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
When it crashes, the screen goes black and the CPU usage increases
(the CPU fan goes mad :)).
If you have time, try each card separately and see if you can pinpoint
the crash to a specific configuration.
Done! I didn't get the
That's a good start, you could also try older versions of
xserver-xorg-video-nv and xserver-xorg-core and see if it broke in a
specific upgrade. You can find older packages here,
http://snapshot.debian.net/
Otherwise, I suggest you use the reportbug tool to file a bug report for
On 4/7/07, Nelson Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a good start, you could also try older versions of
xserver-xorg-video-nv and xserver-xorg-core and see if it broke in a
specific upgrade. You can find older packages here,
http://snapshot.debian.net/
Otherwise, I suggest you use
Hi.
I had a successful setup a long time ago with Xorg and xinerama
in Debian sid. I use 2 monitors and 2 video cards.
It used to work well, but now I doesn't work anymore, even with the
same configuration file I had before. I didn't have the time to debug, until
today.
Has something similar
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 14:38 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
Hi.
I had a successful setup a long time ago with Xorg and xinerama
in Debian sid. I use 2 monitors and 2 video cards.
It used to work well, but now I doesn't work anymore, even with the
same configuration file I had before. I
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 15:48 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
What nVidia modules are you using? 9129 was the last version that
supported the NV18 chipset. I know, I have an exact duplicate of the
card.
Looks like he's using the free nv driver.
Anyway, getting a backtrace of the crash, preferably
.
Yes.
dpkg -l| grep nvidia
Post the output from there.
Nothing new... This installation has 2 years and I've had 5 about
different video
cards (and 3 PCs) since then. Same installation.
rc nvidia-glx-dev 1.0.8776-4
NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x
Dear Debian folks,
I have installed Debian on my PC here. It runs a 1200MHz Athlon CPU and has
one 20GB disk on it with Fedora Core 5 on it and now after deleted Windows a
second disk (primary) which is 40GB in size has now got the Desktop Debian
installation on it.
At least I think it
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 21:10, Michael Fothergill shared this with us all:
-- Dear Debian folks,
--
-- I have installed Debian on my PC here.
Which Debian? Sarge, Etch or Sid?
It runs a 1200MHz Athlon CPU and
has -- one 20GB disk on it with Fedora Core 5 on it and now after deleted
Thanks for responding,
mikef
From: M-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: video cards, the mouse, Xfree86 and Debian installation.
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:42:25 +1000
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 21:10, Michael Fothergill shared this with us
all:
-- Dear
Michael Fothergill wrote:
Dear Debian folks,
I have installed Debian on my PC here. It runs a 1200MHz Athlon CPU
and has one 20GB disk on it with Fedora Core 5 on it and now after
deleted Windows a second disk (primary) which is 40GB in size has now
got the Desktop Debian installation on
Kent West wrote:
gpm also is a quicker means of
experimenting with mouse types than trying to startx over and over
until you get it right.
Or, to find the correct location, you can type cat /dev/psaux and move
the mouse around; if you see a bunch of garbage appear on the screen,
you've
should probably reconfigure the Xwindows to make it more precisely set up.
I can also have a go at configuring the printer. I am well accustomed to
doing this in Fedora.
Regards,
Michael Fothergill
From: Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: video cards
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:55:05AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
Depending what you want as a window manager etc.. You have to scan 10
OK. I will now reinstall and scan the pants of the entire
distribution.
STOP! You don't have to reinstall. You've got a working CLI right?
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 08:06:01AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Manaen Schlabach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
don't want to give up their 3d stuff and that seems to be the primary
reason we can't get a good open source driver.
, the topic of video cards is where I get most
undecided...
Thanks for any experiences shared, Rogério.
Back when I had an NVIDIA TNT2/M64, I installed the nvidia binary
driver, and 3D games flew (relative to my needs, of course). I'm
sure that using the nvidia driver the now-equally-trailing
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 12:01 -0400, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
On 4/21/06, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 03:37 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
don't want to
Manaen Schlabach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
don't want to give up their 3d stuff and that seems to be the primary
reason we can't get a good open source driver.
S, sowhat exactly is in the video card drivers they're so paranoid
Miles Bader wrote:
Manaen Schlabach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
don't want to give up their 3d stuff and that seems to be the primary
reason we can't get a good open source driver.
S, sowhat exactly is in the video card
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 08:06:01AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Manaen Schlabach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
don't want to give up their 3d stuff and that seems to be the primary
reason we can't get a good open source driver.
Miles writes:
So... what's the interesting stuff in the driver that they're trying to
protect? Texture management?
Several different things. They often don't own the copyrights to
everything in the driver: they license some of it from other companies.
They also often license parts of the
Christopher Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So... what's the interesting stuff in the driver that they're trying
to protect? Texture management?
I think the 'interesting' stuff is the nuts and botls of sending data,
because I think they're afraid someone will reverse-engineer their board
On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
When Intel makes stand-alone video cards, they'll get more notice
from those of us who don't want on-board video.
Actually, between the choices of being able to use the driver even if
the card is on-board or not using it (or it having poor support under
Free
need 3D
and my trusty, old Matrox card is keeping up with my necessities.
But I'm frequently asked (by friends) to recommend hardware that would
run Linux well and, well, the topic of video cards is where I get most
undecided...
Thanks for any experiences shared, Rogério.
--
Rogério Brito
On Thursday 20 April 2006 23:37, Rogério Brito wrote:
On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
Still, if they come out with reasonably priced cards that can do
3D like an NVIDIA FX 5200 using the nvidia binary driver, I'd
How exactly is the performance of such a beast? I have never had the
the
opportunity of using a binary driver for video, since I don't need 3D
and my trusty, old Matrox card is keeping up with my necessities.
But I'm frequently asked (by friends) to recommend hardware that would
run Linux well and, well, the topic of video cards is where I get most
undecided
, but it was there.
When Intel makes stand-alone video cards, they'll get more notice
from those of us who don't want on-board video.
--
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
... going to war without France is like going deer
Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.
On Apr 18 2006, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
From a recent ZDNet article
http://news.com.com/2102-7344_3-6061491.html?tag=st.util.print
Yes, I read this very same article with great interest (and what a good
timing it had, considering our
Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.On Apr 18 2006, Manaen Schlabach wrote: From a recent ZDNet article http://news.com.com/2102-7344_3-6061491.html?tag=st.util.printYes, I read this very same article with great interest (and what a goodtiming
i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.On Apr 18
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 16:53 -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're
site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't
get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.
When Intel makes stand-alone video
to linux, but it was there.When Intel makes "stand-alone" video cards, they'll get more noticefrom those of us who don't want on-board video.-- -Ron Johnson, Jr.Jefferson, LA USA"... going to war without France is
to linux, but it was there.
When Intel makes stand-alone video cards, they'll get more notice
from those of us who don't want on-board video.
But they do. I distinctly remember installing about a hundred Intel
i880-based Intel video cards circa 1998.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP Google Talk
section, i couldn't
get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.
When Intel makes stand-alone video cards, they'll get more notice
from those of us who don't want on-board video.
But they do. I distinctly remember installing about a hundred Intel
i880-based Intel video
site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i
couldn't get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.
When Intel makes stand-alone video cards, they'll get more notice
from those of us who don't want on-board video.
But they do. I distinctly
Hi!!!
I am planning to use backstreet ruby to run a multi-headed PC.
I already have a system (i810) with inbuilt agp card. Its X is setup
correctly and its currently running Debian woody with FVWM window
manager. I am planning to buy another PCI VGA card. What type will you
recommend,which is
Hi all.
I have a strange problem with my machine. I have an old 4megs agp card and a
pci voodoo 3dfx. I can set X to boot on my pci with no problem at all,
by specifying in XFConfig-4
Section Device
Identifier Voodoo3
VendorName 3dfx
Driver tdfx
Anyone offer a tip?
I just re-installed my entire system. From a single-CD rescue disk.
Everything was done by hand, except for a few config files that I had
stashed away. Hopefully this means I have everything in my notes that
you'll need to get nvidia working. Note: I'm on a laptop and
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 08:45, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
Quoting Kevin McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So here's the question -- how many different ways do I need to tell the
system to keepen its little mittens offen those packages? Can you suggest
another/better way to accomplish this?
Quoting Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 08:45, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
Quoting Kevin McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So here's the question -- how many different ways do I need to tell the
system to keepen its little mittens offen those packages? Can you suggest
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:13:10 -0600
Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 4191 version caused problems for everybody. I don't know anyone
who was able to make it work in Debian, Mandrake or RedHat.
Worked fine here. Though it didn't support Dual Head on my chipset at
the time, it
Dan Hunt wrote:
I went apt-get install nvidia-kernel-src and
apt-get install nvidia-glx-src
and I found the instructions a bit confusing,
/usr/doc/nvidia-kernel-src/README.Debian
cd linux ( or your kernel source directory )
O.K. I have a stock kernel installed
2.4.18-bf2.4
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:07:29PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Hope this helps,
Bob
Thanks Bob, I appreciate the help, I will give it a whirl.
Kind Regards
Dan Hunt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin McKinley wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
wget http://205.158.109.140/XFree86_40/1.0-2880/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2880.tar.gz
wget http://205.158.109.140/XFree86_40/1.0-2880/NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-2880.tar.gz
wgetting the tarballs is no longer necessary; NVIDIA now allows them to be
distributed.
When
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:15:08 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
When you install the Debian nvidia packages, the tarballs are put in
/usr/src.
Only if you don't care which version you get. See in my message my
description of problems with the current version at the time of my
Setting up woody on my main box. Using geforce4 mx pci video card. After
installing x and running starx, I get error messages stating no screens
found. When installing x, I had chose the nv server. Was this correct? Had
good experiences on my test comp with Debian and would really love to get
On Sat, 31 May 2003 18:41:45 -0300
james leclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setting up woody on my main box. Using geforce4 mx pci video card.
After installing x and running starx, I get error messages stating no
screens found. When installing x, I had chose the nv server. Was this
correct?
james leclair wrote:
Setting up woody on my main box. Using geforce4 mx pci video card. After
installing x and running starx, I get error messages stating no screens
found. When installing x, I had chose the nv server. Was this correct? Had
good experiences on my test comp with Debian and
[Drifting from original topic and on to tuxracer problems...]
Ron Johnson wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
The framebuffer is needed for some programs, notably tuxracer, which
use it and you won't be able to run those programs without it. Darn!
Are you sure? I'm running XFree 4.2.1 with the
On Sat, 31 May 2003 18:41:45 -0300
james leclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setting up woody on my main box. Using geforce4 mx pci video card. After
installing x and running starx, I get error messages stating no screens
found. When installing x, I had chose the nv server. Was this correct?
On Sat, 31 May 2003 21:23:19 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
From the utah-glx FAQ:
GLX is basically the glue that ties OpenGL and X together. Most of the code
in Utah-GLX is actually dealing with graphics chipset specific drivers code.
Most of the OpenGL support is provided by Mesa
Go to the NVIDIA web site and download their drivers, or get the packages
nvidia-kernel-src and nvidia-glx-src from Debian.
Follow the instructions.
I went apt-get install nvidia-kernel-src and
apt-get install nvidia-glx-src
and I found the instructions a bit confusing,
Hello all,
I am seeking your input on video cards. The goal is to upgrade from the
current voodoo3500tv
What is the minium chipset in NVidia/ATI that has slightly more power
than the voodoo3500tv?
Which AllInWonder's are supported by Woody?
Which NVidia chips are supported by Woody?
Any
Hi All James,
who inquires after ATI drivers Debian Tux.
I have a Radeon 9000 Por I am running it via the dri-sourceforge
stuff. Tiz nice.
I used Synaptic to do the dirty work it is a honey of an app. Well
done to the geeks that put that beastie together.
There are official ATI drivers
Thanks to everyone who pitched in an opinion, that was indeed what I was
after; the sort of input you just don't get from an HCL. :)
Based on that, I think we'll go with ATI. My own experience with video
cards is pretty out of date these days; I still remember when a Voodoo
was the best you
Hi all.
We're in the process of drafting a proposal for upgrading the Debian
machines in our public computing lab, as well as replacing our last
remaining SGI machine with a Debian box. The SGI in particular is
mostly used for scientific visualization applications.
I know this question gets
quote who=Michael Jinks
Hi all.
We're in the process of drafting a proposal for upgrading the Debian
machines in our public computing lab, as well as replacing our last
remaining SGI machine with a Debian box. The SGI in particular is mostly
used for scientific visualization applications.
On Thursday 27 June 2002 04:37 pm, nate wrote:
quote who=Michael Jinks
Hi all.
We're in the process of drafting a proposal for upgrading the
Debian machines in our public computing lab, as well as replacing
our last remaining SGI machine with a Debian box. The SGI in
particular is
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 18:35, Michael Jinks wrote:
I know this question gets asked on a regular basis, but given a need for
quick and clear 3D imaging (OpenGL, usually), is there currently a clear
preference for which video card to use?
I've had good experience with nVidia cards except their
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
