Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Aug 07 18:35 -0500]:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22, and
QEMU + MSDOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones possbile.
This
* Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Aug 07 18:35 -0500]:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones possbile.
This is not an
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
[snip]
Did you run kqemu with qemu?
No, I couldn't get
Tom Grove wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22,
Hi Mike.
Mike McCarty, 07.08.2007 09:22:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
[snip]
Did
There's a Live CD based on Mandriva which has Virtualbox built-in. RAM
requirements are bound to be very hefty, but 1 GB should be enough.
http://mcnlive.org (Virtual City build).
On 07.08.2007 at 2:22 Mike McCarty wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hi Mike.
[about kqemu]
No, I couldn't get it to build for me.
How did you try? More than the following commands is not necessary:
I downloaded the source and used the recommended commands.
# apt-get install module-assistant
# m-a prepare
# m-a a-i kqemu
#
Aenn Seidhe Priest wrote:
There's a Live CD based on Mandriva which has Virtualbox built-in. RAM
requirements are bound to be very hefty, but 1 GB should be enough.
$ head /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 248088 kB
MemFree: 2916 kB
Buffers: 9240 kB
Cached: 51432 kB
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hi Mike.
Mike McCarty, 07.08.2007 09:22:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of
* Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones possbile.
- Nate
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur radio
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones possbile.
This is not an issue with the distro, it's a defect in the
original
On Aug 7, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Aug 07 17:29
-0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones possbile.
This is not an issue with
I would like to see how VirtualBox stands up against the others. It seems to
be the fastest emulator when it comes to Windows. Although this is only one
person's opinion and there is no scientific evidence it just feels faster.
-Tom
VB runs great here. I'm virtualizing Arch, Fedora
On Sunday 05 August 2007 16:23:12 B.Hoffmann wrote:
I would like to see how VirtualBox stands up against the others. It
seems to be the fastest emulator when it comes to Windows. Although this
is only one person's opinion and there is no scientific evidence it
just feels faster.
-Tom
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22, and
QEMU + MSDOS
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22, and
QEMU + MSDOS
Tom Grove wrote:
I would like to see how VirtualBox stands up against the others. It
seems to be the fastest emulator when it comes to Windows. Although
this is only one person's opinion and there is no scientific evidence
it just feels faster.
Post a URL. I have been running some
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22, and
QEMU + MSDOS 6.22. I found that each
21 matches
Mail list logo
