On 9/23/2010 9:51 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:49:42 -0400 (EDT), Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 23/09/10 06:14, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:29:59 -0400 (EDT), Mark Allums wrote:
I am probably way late on this one, but that maneuver is a nonstarter.
Nested Virtu
On 24/09/10 00:51, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:49:42 -0400 (EDT), Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 23/09/10 06:14, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:29:59 -0400 (EDT), Mark Allums wrote:
I am probably way late on this one, but that maneuver is a nonstarter.
>
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:49:42 -0400 (EDT), Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 23/09/10 06:14, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:29:59 -0400 (EDT), Mark Allums wrote:
>>>
>>> I am probably way late on this one, but that maneuver is a nonstarter.
>>> Nested Virtualization is very difficult and
On 9/22/2010 9:56 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
This is the exception that proves the rule. I still think that doing it
under an AMD64 or Intel x86_64 is probably futile under the current
state-of -the-art.
Nested virtualization is *not* the point or objective of the exercise -
enabling installa
On 23/09/10 07:38, Mark Allums wrote:
> On 9/22/2010 3:14 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> That may be true for some virtualization software, but not for all.
>> My "day job" is as a system programmer for IBM mainframe systems,
>> and among my duties is responsibility for a z/VM system. In z/VM,
>> ne
On 23/09/10 06:14, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:29:59 -0400 (EDT), Mark Allums wrote:
>>
>> I am probably way late on this one, but that maneuver is a nonstarter.
>> Nested Virtualization is very difficult and kind of pointless. A few
>> security researchers[0] have done it, mo
On 23/09/10 05:34, Mark Allums wrote:
> On 9/21/2010 6:51 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> Someone with more knowledge of the history of Virtual PC may be able to
>> explain those similarities.
>
> Microsoft did not create VPC, they bought it from Connectix. It's
>
On 23/09/10 05:29, Mark Allums wrote:
> On 9/21/2010 6:51 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> To satisfy my curiosity I have been trying (without success) to get
>> Debian installed and running in Windoof 7 Virtual PC.
>>
>> What I have discovered is that:-
>> 1
On 9/22/2010 3:14 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
That may be true for some virtualization software, but not for all.
My "day job" is as a system programmer for IBM mainframe systems,
and among my duties is responsibility for a z/VM system. In z/VM,
nested virtualization is not difficult, pointless, o
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:29:59 -0400 (EDT), Mark Allums wrote:
>
> I am probably way late on this one, but that maneuver is a nonstarter.
> Nested Virtualization is very difficult and kind of pointless. A few
> security researchers[0] have done it, mostly as a stunt to prove a
> technical point,
On 9/21/2010 6:51 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Someone with more knowledge of the history of Virtual PC may be able to
explain those similarities.
Microsoft did not create VPC, they bought it from Connectix. It's
provenance probably includes a lot of old code from various places. I
us
On 9/21/2010 6:51 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
To satisfy my curiosity I have been trying (without success) to get
Debian installed and running in Windoof 7 Virtual PC.
What I have discovered is that:-
1. If you run Windoof 7 in VirtualBox (under Debian) it runs fine -
given an inordinate amount
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 15:34:41 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 21/09/10 22:59, John Hasler wrote:
> > Scott Ferguson writes:
> >> 3. It would require reverse-engineering - which is bad
> >
> > No it isn't. I noted that Microsoft claims that it is illegal, but that
> > is not the same thing at al
dge they'd just completed while a legion
marched over it. There's a responsibility that comes with the money (and
the rattle of a stick in the swill bucket).
That's the product.
Now if I can just find the time to make Virtual PC work - then anyone
with non-Admin access to Windoof 7
Scott Ferguson writes:
> 3. It would require reverse-engineering - which is bad
No it isn't. I noted that Microsoft claims that it is illegal, but that
is not the same thing at all.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Regarding post "ps - illegal instruction" by Jerry Stuckle
To satisfy my curiosity I have been trying (without success) to get
Debian installed and running in Windoof 7 Virtual PC.
What I have discovered is that:-
1. If you run Windoof 7 in VirtualBox (under Debian) it runs fine
Some people like OpenVZ, though I'm not sure how comparable it is to MS's
product.
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 02:20:40PM +0100, pch wrote:
> Hello,
> Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.
I like VirtualBox. I had been using VMWare, but kept running
into problems every time there was a kernel update, when I had
to search around for patches an
Doug Mitton wrote:
On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:40:19 +0100, you wrote:
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pch wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.
I don't know MS Virtual PC, but I use the VMware server with good
result. The only complaint
On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:40:19 +0100, you wrote:
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>pch wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.
>>
>
>I don't know MS Virtual PC, but I use the VMware server with good
>resu
pch wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.
I don't know MS Virtual PC, but I use the VMware server with good
result. The only complaint: VMware is slow to adapt their *closed*
source to new kernels, e.g. server 1.0.7 to linux 2.6.27.
pch wrote:
> Hello,
> Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.
>
> Pawel
>
>
Heh, heh, heh... :)
Uh, go with virtualbox.
There are two versions, the open source and the closed source. The
closed source is free to use for personal use, bu
Try kvm,you will like it.
as fast as i can see
2008/11/9 pch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello,
> Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.
>
> Pawel
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a
> subject of "unsubscri
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 5:20 AM, pch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.
>
> Pawel
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".
>
Hello,
Can anyone recommend a good virtual machine, equivalent MS Virtual PC.
Pawel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAIL PROTECTED]
>> I was told to install Debian on MS Virtual PC for a class. I
>> think I'm getting kernel hang
>> The last line is "Freeing unused kernel memory 256k freed"
>> This is the download I used "debian-40r3-i386-netinst"
I've tested th
ble at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ )
I have CC'ed that mailing list. Please remove the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] recipients when you
reply.
Make sure you say which version of Virtual PC you use in your mail (VPC
2007 ; English ; 32 bits ??).
I don't have VPC, but I h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 6, 2005, at 6:20 PM, Barry Hawkins wrote:
Has anyone managed to get a Virtual PC instance on Mac OS X to
boot one of the stock 2.6 kernels? My instance boots up without
issue on a 2.4 kernel, but there's an immediate oops when t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone managed to get a Virtual PC instance on Mac OS X to
boot one of the stock 2.6 kernels? My instance boots up without
issue on a 2.4 kernel, but there's an immediate oops when trying to
use either the current 2.6.8 or 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 9, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Michael Martinell wrote:
I just downloaded 3.01 r5 and wanted to try it out. I set up an
virtual pc
2004 session in and installed it. I can only get X to start in 256
color
640x480 mode. Not a very useful mode. I
I just downloaded 3.01 r5 and wanted to try it out. I set up an virtual pc
2004 session in and installed it. I can only get X to start in 256 color
640x480 mode. Not a very useful mode. I have tried just about every
combination of xf86config and dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 however I
On Monday 30 August 2004 23:49, Benny Wong wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently installed the testing Debian (Sarge) on Microsoft Virtual
> PC 2004. I am new to linux and am still poking around.
>
> I installed a base system and I installed x-window-system and gnome by
> using
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:49:46PM -0400, Benny Wong wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently installed the testing Debian (Sarge) on Microsoft Virtual
> PC 2004. I am new to linux and am still poking around.
>
> I installed a base system and I installed x-window-system and gnome by
&g
(PDT), Sysmin Sys73m47ic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I recently installed the testing Debian (Sarge) on
> > Microsoft Virtual
> > PC 2004. I am new to linux and am still poking
> > around.
>
> I think that Microsoft is the key word here. Lol. Ok,
> all
> I recently installed the testing Debian (Sarge) on
> Microsoft Virtual
> PC 2004. I am new to linux and am still poking
> around.
I think that Microsoft is the key word here. Lol. Ok,
all joking aside. This is a new product for Microsoft
and they are probably still ironing out the b
Hello,
I recently installed the testing Debian (Sarge) on Microsoft Virtual
PC 2004. I am new to linux and am still poking around.
I installed a base system and I installed x-window-system and gnome by
using the 'apt-get install ...'. When I startx, they display is VERY
wide and unv
On 1/8/04 3:03 PM, "David Z Maze" wrote:
> If I understand what Virtual PC does properly, the actual hardware
> inside the Mac is somewhat irrelevant; you'd need to figure out what
> network hardware Virtual PC is emulating and use a driver for that.
Okay that makes s
"Dave's List Addy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to install the latest Debian with the ISO
> bf2.4-3.023-netinst. I am doing this with Virtual PC 6.1 on an Apple
> iMac 17 " Flat Panel with a G4 1.25 MHz. I can get the install to
> boot and
I am trying to install the latest Debian with the ISO bf2.4-3.023-netinst. I
am doing this with Virtual PC 6.1 on an Apple iMac 17 " Flat Panel with a G4
1.25 MHz. I can get the install to boot and start, my problem is on
selecting the correct Network driver for the iMac. I tried Tulip and
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:25, Adelle L. Hartley wrote:
> > For S3Trio chipsets
> > apt-get install xserver-s3
>
> I have done the above, and modified the "Device" section
> of my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file to read
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Generic Video Card"
> Driver "s3"
>
Woohoo! It works.
I edited the the configuration file to use the "vesa" driver.
Don't really care right now if there is a better driver
available for the s3 card.
Haven't got the sound working yet, but that's a subject for
another day.
Thankyou!
>
> For S3Trio chipsets
> apt-get install xserve
> For S3Trio chipsets
> apt-get install xserver-s3
I have done the above, and modified the "Device" section
of my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file to read
Section "Device"
Identifier "Generic Video Card"
Driver "s3"
BusID "PCI:00:08:0"
VideoRam8192
EndSection
The ou
Adelle L. Hartley wrote:
I am too much of a newbie
at this to have even figured out how to go back to the bash prompt.
(I'll have to figure that out before I attempt to change anything
else).
Ctrl-Alt-F2 should get you to the second virtual terminal (VT) console.
At that point, you can kill your X
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:25, Michael Martinell wrote:
> It appears that xfree86 does not support the base S3 card after 3.3.6. It
> only supports the savage series.
>
> Is there a recommended downgrade path that works?
>
> Or in other words, what would the apt-get command for this be?
For S3Trio ch
OK, I now seem to be making some progress, although not quite
enough.
Following advice received on this list, I have used "lspci" to
get the bus id of the video card, and then by running
"dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86" a few times, I have managed
to get x-windows to start in 300x200 mode, using
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:05:01PM -0600, Michael Martinell wrote:
| I have tried the vga driver with no success.
|
| How do you get the busID? I have tried searching google but have came up
| empty.
lspci.
For example, a machine here at work needed me to specify t
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:05:01PM -0600, Michael Martinell wrote:
| I have tried the vga driver with no success.
|
| How do you get the busID? I have tried searching google but have came up
| empty.
lspci.
For example, a machine here at work needed me to specify the busID.
lspci on that machin
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Virtual PC 5.2
I have tried the vga driver with no success.
How do you get the busID? I have tried searching google but have came up
empty.
-Original Message-
From: Derrick 'dman' Hudson [mai
I have tried the vga driver with no success.
How do you get the busID? I have tried searching google but have came up
empty.
-Original Message-
From: Derrick 'dman' Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:53:29AM -0600, Michael Martinell wrote:
| It lists it as a VGA Compatible controller S3 Inc 86c764/765 [Trio32/64/64+]
Try the 'vga' driver. It might not be as good as the s3 driver on
real hardware, but it should at least be operational and give you
something to start
: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual PC 5.2
Michael Martinell wrote:
>
>
> I have tried every card (I think) listed and I have not had any luck
> with virtual pc.
>
>
>
> If anybody out there knows what it takes to configure the s
Michael Martinell wrote:
I have tried every card (I think) listed and I have not had any luck
with virtual pc.
If anybody out there knows what it takes to configure the startx for the
virtual pc environment I would be interested. I know that it works, as
I had it running with Knoppix at
I have tried every card (I think) listed and I have not had
any luck with virtual pc.
If anybody out there knows what it takes to configure the startx
for the virtual pc environment I would be interested. I know that it works, as
I had it running with Knoppix at one time
Adelle L. Hartley wrote:
I am trying to install Debian on Virtual PC 5.2 (on a wintel box)
The first part of the install works fine, but I am having trouble
getting X-Windows to work. I have edited the XF86Config file
to use the s3 driver, but I think I have made a mistake somewhere.
The output
Hi,
I hope this is the place for newbie questions...
I am trying to install Debian on Virtual PC 5.2 (on a wintel box)
The first part of the install works fine, but I am having trouble
getting X-Windows to work. I have edited the XF86Config file
to use the s3 driver, but I think I have made a
to be able to
> help you, we need some info. To begin with, what video card do you have
> installed?
Virtual PC may be different, but under vmware at least, you tell X you
have a vmware "video card" and vmware handles how to talk to your real
card. VMware could hypothetically r
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:39, Jaime Ash wrote:
> Does anybody in this group have any clues?
Yes. According to your logs, you have selected the nvidia driver, but
that driver thinks there is no nvidia card in your pc. So, to be able to
help you, we need some info. To begin with, what video card do
I have successfully installed Debian 3.0 running under Connectix Virtual
PC software on an HP Pavilion 8760C PC, with Windows 2000 as the host OS for
the Connectix software – but, while it seems to work OK for most functions, including
networking, at the command prompt, I am unable to get
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 04:10:26PM -0500, David Batey wrote:
> Hello
> I am trying to run Potato on my Win98se machine using Connectix Virtual PC
> and everything is working even X with one major exception. My network
> connection is not.
>
> Virtual PC uses emulated hardwar
Hello
I am trying to run Potato on my Win98se machine
using Connectix Virtual PC and everything is working even X with one major
exception. My network connection is not.
Virtual PC uses emulated hardware.
s3 trio 32/64 4m video
sb16 sound
DEC 21041 network card (supposedly at IRQ 1
but
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 02:14:54PM -0800, nate wrote:
>
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have installed Debian on my imac using Virtual PC, but I am
> > having problems with X window.
> >
> > Do you know if Debian can run on VPC or will I have to change to
>
> Hi
>
> I have installed Debian on my imac using Virtual PC, but I am
> having problems with X window.
>
> Do you know if Debian can run on VPC or will I have to change to
> redhat?
what video chip does virtualPC emulate? i haven't used
it myself. when using VMWare i
d Debian on my imac using Virtual PC, but I am having
> problems with X window.
>
> Do you know if Debian can run on VPC or will I have to change to redhat?
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Hi
I have installed Debian on my imac using Virtual PC, but I am having
problems with X window.
Do you know if Debian can run on VPC or will I have to change to redhat?
Thanks
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 12, 1998 at 09:19:02PM +0100, Magnus Lewan wrote:
> I try to install Linux in Virtual PC for Macintosh, but I get in an infinte
> loop after booting from the resc1440 diskett.
I've actually heard of some one succeeding with this. One, make sure you
are using Virtual PC 2.
I try to install Linux in Virtual PC for Macintosh, but I get in an infinte
loop after booting from the resc1440 diskett.
>From a screen saying:
"I had trouble checking the choice of root device. I'll assume that the
root fs is still "". Press enter to continue."
66 matches
Mail list logo
