Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-18 Thread Sean Furey
Hi Robert! Excuse my ignorance on the maintainance of distribution lists, but why not just reject submissions with attachments that match the pattern *.EXE? Thats the first idea I've seen that I'd agree with. Much as I dislike Outlook, I used to like it, I suspect many people still do, and

ssh - methods (was Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list)

2000-11-15 Thread kmself
on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 08:30:18PM -0900, Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:20:54PM -0700, John Galt wrote: I've started to get lazy and use an RSA authenticated ssh connection--saves me typing my password... actually RSA is a better way to go, you

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-15 Thread David Teague
From: Vijay Prabakaran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list Yes. Good point. What are people using M$ apps on Windoze doing on this list anyway. Vijay, Occasionally my Linux box will be down when my Windoze box is up

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-15 Thread David Teague
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Ethan Benson wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:27:46PM -0800, Vijay Prabakaran wrote: Well I guess some people just have to use windoze. So but they DON'T have to use Outlook, if its a corporate mandate you probably shouldn't even be using corporate mail services for

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-15 Thread David A. Rogers
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote: I would be OK with blocking MS Outhouse, but not Windoze mail clients in general. Some of us have to use that 'OS' at work, and those of us with any sense use Netscape or Eudora (Eudora doesn't work on NT4.0, so it's Netscape in my case).

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-15 Thread Kent West
David Teague wrote: However, the suggestion that we use Eudora is probably the correct thing for any of us that are required use Lose 9x to do. Is that still free? I remember a freeware 16 bit version I used with MS Lose 3.1. Is it still available? The old free version was a lite version.

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-15 Thread Myles Green
On Wednesday 15 November 2000 09:19, David Teague wrote: However, the suggestion that we use Eudora is probably the correct thing for any of us that are required use Lose 9x to do. Is that still free? I remember a freeware 16 bit version I used with MS Lose 3.1. Is it still available? They

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-15 Thread Robert Guthrie
On Wednesday 15 November 2000 10:24, David Teague wrote: MIS managers have a LOT of power. They frequently prohibit installation of any software by users. AND they are NOT always prohibited from use of the company systems to mail this list. Let's not be quite so tough on them. There are

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Ethan Benson
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:59:35PM -0500, Mike wrote: In case no one has noticed yet, there are a bunch of virus infected messages coming through here on the debian-users list. For information on this virus, go to: http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.navidad.html Those of us

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Vijay Prabakaran
Yes. Good point. What are people using M$ apps on Windoze doing on this list anyway. Vijay. --- Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:59:35PM -0500, Mike wrote: In case no one has noticed yet, there are a bunch of virus infected messages coming through here on

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Joey Hess
Ethan Benson wrote: I hearby propose that the list automatically reject all postings that appear to have been sent using MS Outlook. this way this garbage won't happen each and every time ya new Outlook worm comes out. Please bear in mind that this list is for debian users, and that includes

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread John Griffiths
At work using the computer their employers provided? At 10:39 PM 11/13/2000 -0800, Vijay Prabakaran wrote: Yes. Good point. What are people using M$ apps on Windoze doing on this list anyway. Vijay. --- Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:59:35PM -0500, Mike

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Peter Hugosson-Miller
I would be OK with blocking MS Outhouse, but not Windoze mail clients in general. Some of us have to use that 'OS' at work, and those of us with any sense use Netscape or Eudora (Eudora doesn't work on NT4.0, so it's Netscape in my case). Vijay Prabakaran wrote: Yes. Good point. What are people

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Ethan Benson
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 10:57:10PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Ethan Benson wrote: I hearby propose that the list automatically reject all postings that appear to have been sent using MS Outlook. this way this garbage won't happen each and every time ya new Outlook worm comes out. Please

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 08:15:52AM +0100, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote: I would be OK with blocking MS Outhouse, but not Windoze mail clients in general. Some of us have to use that 'OS' at work, and those of us with any sense use Netscape or Eudora (Eudora doesn't work on NT4.0, so it's

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Vijay Prabakaran
Well I guess some people just have to use windoze. So isn't it possible to filter out all messages with .exe files, word documents, excel docs etc from the list. These would be the main problem causing stuff. Vijay. --- Peter Hugosson-Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would be OK with blocking

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Pollywog
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:59:35 -0500, Mike said: In case no one has noticed yet, there are a bunch of virus infected messages coming through here on the debian-users list. For information on this virus, go to: http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.navidad.html Those of us

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Ethan Benson
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:27:46PM -0800, Vijay Prabakaran wrote: Well I guess some people just have to use windoze. So but they DON'T have to use Outlook, if its a corporate mandate you probably shouldn't even be using corporate mail services for personal mail anyway, doing so will likely get

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Colin Watson
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hearby propose that the list automatically reject all postings that appear to have been sent using MS Outlook. this way this garbage won't happen each and every time ya new Outlook worm comes out. I hereby propose we don't. This stuff doesn't harm us, and

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Remco van de Meent
Colin Watson wrote: I hearby propose that the list automatically reject all postings that appear to have been sent using MS Outlook. this way this garbage won't happen each and every time ya new Outlook worm comes out. I hereby propose we don't. This stuff doesn't harm us, and Outlook

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread kmself
on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:08:02AM +, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I remember when I had to use Exchange at work[1] once ... yuck. We weren't allowed to install anything else. Fortunately I worked out how to get telnet sessions out through the firewall reasonably quickly, and

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Robert Guthrie
On Tuesday 14 November 2000 01:15, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote: I would be OK with blocking MS Outhouse, but not Windoze mail clients in general. Some of us have to use that 'OS' at work, and those of us with any sense use Netscape or Eudora (Eudora doesn't work on NT4.0, so it's Netscape in

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Colin Watson
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:08:02AM +, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I remember when I had to use Exchange at work[1] once ... yuck. We weren't allowed to install anything else. Fortunately I worked out how to get telnet sessions out through the firewall

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Cliff Rice
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 09:11:26PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: I hearby propose that the list automatically reject all postings that appear to have been sent using MS Outlook. this way this garbage won't happen each and every time ya new Outlook worm comes out. I agree, 400+ emails is

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread John Galt
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:08:02AM +, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I remember when I had to use Exchange at work[1] once ... yuck. We weren't allowed to install anything else. Fortunately I worked out how to get telnet

Re: WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-14 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:20:54PM -0700, John Galt wrote: I've started to get lazy and use an RSA authenticated ssh connection--saves me typing my password... actually RSA is a better way to go, you should encrypt the key and use ssh-agent, still saves you from typing the passwd (all but

WARNING - Virus infected messages on list

2000-11-13 Thread Mike
In case no one has noticed yet, there are a bunch of virus infected messages coming through here on the debian-users list. For information on this virus, go to: http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.navidad.html Those of us using Linux for email have nothing to worry about (of course).