Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tuesday 14 July 2015 12:47:05 Gene Heskett wrote:
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene
on list 2 weeks ago
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:41:10AM -0500, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
On 1/19/15, Cindy-Sue Causey butterflyby...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tried a long shot with apt-cache search record terminal
Got back couple interesting looking things. That one on top is right
where it showed up, top of
On 1/22/15, Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:41:10AM -0500, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
Ok, sooo... I went ahead and tried asciinema. FAIR WARNING: When it
asks you if you want to upload your session, it *uploads* your session
*onto the Net*:
On 1/23/15, Cindy-Sue Causey butterflyby...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/22/15, Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:41:10AM -0500, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
Ok, sooo... I went ahead and tried asciinema. FAIR WARNING: When it
asks you if you want to upload your
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 01:40:23 Joel Roth did opine
And Gene did reply:
Alberto Luaces wrote:
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net writes:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get remove network-manager seems to work just
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 19 January 2015 10:13:20 Richard Owlett did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get remove network-manager seems to work just fine for me.
Mart
I have attempted that, several
On 2015-01-20, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
2 of my 4 1Tb disks are reporting 512/4096for sector sizes.
GParted, even with round to cylinders checked, seems helpless at fixing
this.
Really? This seems to imply the contrary:
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 09:12:49 Curt did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 2015-01-20, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
2 of my 4 1Tb disks are reporting 512/4096for sector sizes.
GParted, even with round to cylinders checked, seems helpless at
fixing this.
Really? This seems to
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 08:57:14 Richard Owlett did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 19 January 2015 10:13:20 Richard Owlett did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get
On Monday 19 January 2015 14:42:01 Joe did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:54:57 -0500
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
But that leads to the next logical question: What's the difference
between using apt-get to do that, and synaptic?
Synaptic would have
On 1/19/15, Alberto Luaces alua...@udc.es wrote:
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net writes:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
I have attempted that, several times in the past 5 or 6 years. The list
of stuff it will also remove is usually
On 1/19/15, Cindy-Sue Causey butterflyby...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tried a long shot with apt-cache search record terminal
Got back couple interesting looking things. That one on top is right
where it showed up, top of the search. Haven't downloaded and tested
but description sure fits. :)
Alberto Luaces wrote:
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net writes:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get remove network-manager seems to work just fine for me.
Mart
I have attempted that, several times in the past 5 or 6
Am editing an important *oops* where a command is misspelled. Not sure
the proper protocol for doing this so will addend it up here.
asciiname auth should read asciinema auth..:
On 1/20/15, Cindy-Sue Causey butterflyby...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/19/15, Cindy-Sue Causey butterflyby...@gmail.com
On 2015-01-19, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Thanks Mart. Now I know how to cure that headache. And will do exactly
that on my next install.
BTW, I don't know whether anyone has mentioned this yet, but you can force
static network configuration by providing boot parameter
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get remove network-manager seems to work just fine for me.
Mart
I have attempted that, several times in the past 5 or 6 years. The list
of stuff it will also remove is usually several printed
Hi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:13:20AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get remove network-manager seems to work just fine for me.
Mart
I have attempted that, several times in the past 5 or 6
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:13:20AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get remove network-manager seems to work just fine for me.
Mart
I have attempted that, several times in the past 5 or 6 years.
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net writes:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get remove network-manager seems to work just fine for me.
Mart
I have attempted that, several times in the past 5 or 6 years. The list
of stuff it
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:13:20AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[snip]
I had a similar problem some time back.
Someone pointed me to a utility that saved everything sent to a
console window.
It was not redirection nor a pipe as the console retained all
its
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:13:20AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
Someone pointed me to a utility that saved everything sent to a console
window.
Was it script?
script — make typescript of terminal session
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Stephan Seitz E-Mail:
On Monday 19 January 2015 01:24:35 Mart van de Wege did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com writes:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com writes:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 14:12:03 Joe did
On Monday 19 January 2015 09:54:57 Gene Heskett wrote:
But that leads to the next logical question: What's the difference
between using apt-get to do that, and synaptic?
Synaptic would have literally torn down the system, removing libc6, most
of build-essentials among many many others. I
On Monday 19 January 2015 05:37:47 Lisi Reisz did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Monday 19 January 2015 09:54:57 Gene Heskett wrote:
But that leads to the next logical question: What's the difference
between using apt-get to do that, and synaptic?
Synaptic would have literally torn down
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:54:57 -0500
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
But that leads to the next logical question: What's the difference
between using apt-get to do that, and synaptic?
Synaptic would have literally torn down the system, removing libc6,
most of build-essentials among
On Monday 19 January 2015 10:13:20 Richard Owlett did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
[SNIP]
apt-get remove network-manager seems to work just fine for me.
Mart
I have attempted that, several times in
On Sunday 18 January 2015 17:11:55 Andrew M.A. Cater did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 05:40:43 Andrew M.A. Cater did opine
[Gene]
Oh it usually does, until the initial reboot, at which time network
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com writes:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com writes:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 14:12:03 Joe did opine
I don't have Gnome on the workstation either, but
I do have various Gnome
On Sunday 18 January 2015 18:21:02 Mart van de Wege did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com writes:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 14:12:03 Joe did opine
I don't have Gnome on the workstation either, but
I do have various Gnome bits such as Nautilus. It really should be
On Sunday 18 January 2015 06:00:55 Lisi Reisz did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Saturday 17 January 2015 20:38:25 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 17 January 2015 13:04:09 Clive Standbridge did opine
It's a bit late now, but you might have had much lighter download
using the network
On Sunday 18 January 2015 05:40:43 Andrew M.A. Cater did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:38:25PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 17 January 2015 13:04:09 Clive Standbridge did opine
And Gene did reply:
I assume it has a name, is this 7.8=Jessie?
Its
On Saturday 17 January 2015 20:38:25 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 17 January 2015 13:04:09 Clive Standbridge did opine
It's a bit late now, but you might have had much lighter download
using the network installation CD. Three DVDs is about 13GB; I doubt
that most installations would be
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:38:25PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 17 January 2015 13:04:09 Clive Standbridge did opine
And Gene did reply:
I assume it has a name, is this 7.8=Jessie?
Its name is wheezy. It's an update, not a new release. See:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:38:25 -0500
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the last 9 debian/ubuntu flavored installs, on 4
machines here, have all ran up against Network-Mangler, which
promptly tore down any attempts I successfully made to get it online.
.
.
.
.
Sorry,
Joe j...@jretrading.com writes:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:52:29 -0500
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
So how did you kill NM on your workstation?
It was never there. It's a dependency of quite a lot of stuff, notably
evolution
Here on my laptop (running Sid) it's not. I can remove
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com writes:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 14:12:03 Joe did opine
I don't have Gnome on the workstation either, but
I do have various Gnome bits such as Nautilus. It really should be
possible to avoid NM, but probably not without some effort.
Using information that it
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2015 05:40:43 Andrew M.A. Cater did opine
[Gene]
Oh it usually does, until the initial reboot, at which time network
mangler steps in and destroys your work.
... stuff snipped by Andy ...
But no, thats too
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:52:29 -0500
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
So how did you kill NM on your workstation?
It was never there. It's a dependency of quite a lot of stuff, notably
evolution and ppp, but since I use neither I don't need it. But the
Gnome metapackage includes
On Sunday 18 January 2015 14:12:03 Joe did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:38:25 -0500
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the last 9 debian/ubuntu flavored installs, on 4
machines here, have all ran up against Network-Mangler, which
promptly tore down
On 01/16/2015 09:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
So now I am back on the old LUCID based install. Where hopefully I can
send an email. With kmail.
Lucid is more Jessie level than wheezy level. I use wheezy on the
servers, for damn sure. But I run Jessie on my desktop for the Lucid
level
I assume it has a name, is this 7.8=Jessie?
Its name is wheezy. It's an update, not a new release. See:
https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/
https://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2015/msg0.html
Anybody else? FWIW, 7.8, all 3 dvd's in amd64 format, is being
downloaded now. So I'll
On 01/17/2015 01:04 PM, Clive Standbridge wrote:
I assume it has a name, is this 7.8=Jessie?
Its name is wheezy. It's an update, not a new release. See:
https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/
https://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2015/msg0.html
Jessie is 8.X It's ready for primetime
On 1/17/15, Clive Standbridge list-u...@tgstandbridges.plus.com wrote:
Anybody else? FWIW, 7.8, all 3 dvd's in amd64 format, is being
downloaded now. So I'll give it one more try.
It's a bit late now, but you might have had much lighter download
using the network installation CD. Three DVDs
On Saturday 17 January 2015 13:04:09 Clive Standbridge did opine
And Gene did reply:
I assume it has a name, is this 7.8=Jessie?
Its name is wheezy. It's an update, not a new release. See:
https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/
https://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2015/msg0.html
On Friday 16 January 2015 21:46:18 Gene Heskett did opine
And Gene did reply:
Greetings, back on the old 10.04.4 LTS LUCID drive.
Ric, installing that mesa library for firefox made firefox work better,
no squawking about the missing file.
But, it pulled in 19 other packages either for
46 matches
Mail list logo
