On Wed, Jul 27, 2016, at 14:29, Brian wrote:
>
> ...
> for one machine, probably ancient but still doing a useful
> job, I have
>
> model name : Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS
>
> That's not enough, is it? What has to done to determine its processor
> class?
>
> I'm happy
On 2016-07-27 19:29 +0100, Brian wrote:
> A 686-class processor is required for stretch
>
> Within the meaning of the Act - what is meant by "686-class processor"?
> Is this something to do with processor instructions and can it be
> determined from 'cat /proc/cpuinfo'?
Yes, this is already
On Wed 27 Jul 2016 at 11:18:21 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 21:17:40 (-0400), Stephen Powell wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, at 19:05, David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > One issue though: I have a useful laptop that has a nifty 686 (AIUI)
> > > Pentium M processor, but I have
On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 21:17:40 (-0400), Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, at 19:05, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > One issue though: I have a useful laptop that has a nifty 686 (AIUI)
> > Pentium M processor, but I have to run linux-image-3.16.0-4-586 on it
> > because it lacks the PAE.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, at 19:05, David Wright wrote:
>
> One issue though: I have a useful laptop that has a nifty 686 (AIUI)
> Pentium M processor, but I have to run linux-image-3.16.0-4-586 on it
> because it lacks the PAE. (It has SSE/SSE2.) Do you know whether
> stretch will cater for
On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 22:28:24 (+0200), Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-07-26 15:04 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > Does this mean that the days of running Debian on an old box in the
> > corner are now numbered, or should a bug be filed against making
> > such apt-related packages depend on such
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 18:47:11 Johann Klammer wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
>
> I did. it's just those two things...
> ...
> kinda thought it was obvious, that the problem is my boxen being too
>
On 2016-07-26 15:04 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 19:47:11 (+0200), Johann Klammer wrote:
>> On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> >
>> > Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
>> >
>> I did. it's just those two things...
>> ...
On Tue 26 Jul 2016 at 19:47:11 (+0200), Johann Klammer wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
> >
> I did. it's just those two things...
> ...
> kinda thought it was obvious, that the problem is my
Le nonidi 9 thermidor, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> Why use Stretch if the software in it ios too new for your boxen??
Old software have unpatched security issues. And it is not the software that
is too new, it is the build options.
> Of course it is not obvious!!
It was to me, at least.
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 18:47:11 Johann Klammer wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
>
> I did. it's just those two things...
Why use Stretch if the software in it ios too new for your boxen??
> ...
>
On 07/26/2016 04:50 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Telling us your requirements, will make making a recommendation easier.
>
I did. it's just those two things...
...
kinda thought it was obvious, that the problem is my boxen being too
old to run that stuff.
To be more specific, something I
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 12:49:35 Felix Miata wrote:
> Johann Klammer composed on 2016-07-26 11:35 (UTC+0200):
> > Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
> >
> > I have special needs:
> > binary packages.
> > i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
> >
> > any advice?
>
> Take
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:35:54 +0200 Johann Klammer
wrote:
> Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
Be more specific,please.
> I have special needs:
What are they?
> binary packages.
Most all distros have that option
> i386 code without SSE stuff or other
On 07/26/2016 11:35 AM, Johann Klammer wrote:
Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
I have special needs:
binary packages.
i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
The only one I can think of off the top of my head that isn't
based on Debian that still fulfills your
Johann Klammer composed on 2016-07-26 11:35 (UTC+0200):
Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
I have special needs:
binary packages.
i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
any advice?
Take a look here:
http://www.mepiscommunity.org/wiki
Johann Klammer composed on 2016-07-26 11:35 (UTC+0200):
Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
I have special needs:
binary packages.
i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
any advice?
Take a look here:
http://www.mepiscommunity.org/wiki
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:35:54 Johann Klammer wrote:
> Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
>
> I have special needs:
> binary packages.
> i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
>
> any advice?
https://distrowatch.com/
On 07/26/2016 11:35 AM, Johann Klammer wrote:
> Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
>
> I have special needs:
> binary packages.
> i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
Well, if you don't tell us why Debian doesn't work for you
any more, then it will probably not be
Unfortunately, Debian does not work for me anymore.
I have special needs:
binary packages.
i386 code without SSE stuff or other surprises.
any advice?
20 matches
Mail list logo