On this revelational Saturday, of the seventh month of 2004 you wrote:
> And if this happens with something like glibc, you're hosed.
Okay, I just happen to be the poor sod you were referring to in this nugget I found in
the archives of just three months ago. What's worse is that my carelessnes
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 18:02 -0400, Silvan wrote:
> On Saturday 31 July 2004 10:52 am, Carl Fink wrote:
> > BTW, using information from
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html
> >
> > section 6.14, you can quite easily recompile a Sid package using the Woody
> > libraries to
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:59:52 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Chris Metzler wrote:
> > But that's the best way it can play out. The worst way -- which is
> > thankfully uncommon, but can and does happen -- is if Depends or
> > Conflicts don't catch the problem. An example: package A
Chris Metzler wrote:
> But that's the best way it can play out. The worst way -- which is
> thankfully uncommon, but can and does happen -- is if Depends or
> Conflicts don't catch the problem. An example: package A in stable
> requires libfoo version 2.4 or greater; user installs package B, whic
On Saturday 31 July 2004 10:52 am, Carl Fink wrote:
> BTW, using information from
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html
>
> section 6.14, you can quite easily recompile a Sid package using the Woody
> libraries to run under Woody (unless the program requires actual features
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:34:37 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
>
> Okay... I got told by someone on this list: (a) that it is system
> suicide,
> and (b) that the fact that it is system suicide is w
BTW, using information from
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html
section 6.14, you can quite easily recompile a Sid package using the Woody
libraries to run under Woody (unless the program requires actual features
not available in the older libs).
--
Carl Fink
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 01:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
>
[...]
> (Nonetheless, I'd still like to know where all the fabled and legendary
> DON'T DO THIS warnings are) (especially the one writ
> > What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
Okay... I got told by someone on this list: (a) that it is system
suicide,
and (b) that the fact that it is system suicide is well-documented in
many places with ample dire warnings in 384 languages including Martian
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 04:57:57PM +0200, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
> What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
You might want to look at http://backports.org, which contains many
of the Sid packages backported for use with Woody. If that doesn't
work, you m
What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo